"Like for example the Avians/Bird beings in the Orion viewing lol. It's already been exposed by many people if someone actually does their research."

I disagree. It's better to act on principle, which Farsight is calling "data-driven" approach. The question is: What is the data?

How do you know that the bird being seen in the Orion session is a Blue Avian? Because the Blue Avians aren't the only Avians out there. Did the remote viewer describe the color blue? How did the beak look? Was it even a beak?

Let me explain it this way: The state of the remote viewing we get from Farsight and others is still not HD. It's more like a black and white VHS tape with lots of noise in it. The data is there, but we are still not good at decoding it. This is because the human brain has been tampered with, as the brain is needed to translate the data into something it can work with. We need to repair the brain first in order to see the data in high definition.

The scientific data-driven approach would be to collect the data and the guessing in different categories. We already have so called "low level" and "high level" data. The problem is: Courtney "pulling it together" afterwards is not part of the remote viewing. It's an opinion, just like you having the opinion that the observed bird being must be a Blue Avian.

"There are four root races in this universe: Avian/bird, Leonid/lion/cat, human/Lyran, and Draco/reptilian."

That's not correct.

Avian is an evolutionary branch of the reptilian body.

Cats are mammalians, just like humans.

Insectoids are from the arthropod root.

Furthermore, you are missing spiders and aquatic beings (molluscans etc.) completely.

Have a look at the Stellaris computer game. They got the taxonomy quite right.

➡️ https://stellaris.paradoxwikis.com/Species

Not saying that these species exist in reality, but the classification leads in the right direction. Exceptions are:

Plantoid/Fungoid, as plants do not count as individual beings as long as they can't move freely, and when they can, they are not classified as plants anymore.

Lithoids are not classified next to the other ones. The idea is that bodies are based on silicon or other elements, as apposed to carbon, but this does not make its own species – its more like you are having silicon based insectoids, humanoids etc. Same for necroids (vampires) and toxoids. A species can be toxic for another one based on the predominant elements of its origin planet/sphere.

I don't know where this myth of the four root races comes from, but you find it everywhere. For example, the Stargate TV show had the alliance of the four races that is discovered in the 11th episode "The Torment of Tantalus". In Star Trek, the Federation has four founding members.

My guess is that they are called root races because they initiated something together.

@Jon Smith

"Ascribing emotions to "races" is quite funny because emotions are only based on the emotional body we use to manifest here."

How does the emotional body look like? As far as I'm concerned, the theory of the emotional body is nonsense. Every body is able to experience emotions, as every body is a composition of frequencies. In other words: A body would need to be numbed in order to feel no emotions. Which is what they did to the greys, for instance.

"On the higher levels these emotions don't exist."

That's wrong. Emotions come from the source like everything else. Regarding your own hierarchy of dimensions where the source is at the top, the emotions would flow from top to bottom, manifesting within the higher dimensions first, and then being translated downwards.

"You're also trying to say that one race is inherently evil while another is inherently good which is just a perception you get from this limited manifestation way of thinking."

I don't say that at all. Being good or evil is a choice. The body just represents that choice, as the soul is choosing the environment it believes to be beneficial for its evolution. For example, if a soul lacks empathy and wants to be a predator, it's more likely to incarnate into a Draco or similar predator beings, as the body would come with the capacities the soul needs.

"In reality there is no good or evil"

There is, and I can give you the definitions:

- Good is the balance between service to self and service to others such that neither you nor others get harmed.
- Evil is the lack of balance, either service to self or service to others, such that you or others get harmed.

As you see, evil is what you call the false duality, which you obviously still believe in.

"It's only on the 4D level and 3D here we see Reptilians as negative yet in the past they weren't"

Bringing harm to others is evil. It doesn't matter wether there was no harm in the past. For example, if I steal you car, I can't say that there's no harm because I didn't steal it in the past. It's the present moment that matters.

"it was only due to the way the archons affected them that they fell afterwards"

Who affected the archons?

"Judging on an individual level seems more appropriate than judging everyone as group based."

Yes. A soul within a Draco body who doesn't want to be a predator anymore is not to be judged like a Draco who wants to remain a predator. This would most likely to get the peaceful Draco to be killed by its own kind, leading to the soul choosing a more fitting body for the next incarnation, as the environment needs to reflect the change of behavior.

"The higher you go up on the dimensions the closer you get to the Source"

You don't need to go 'higher' to get to the source. You're thinking in the seperation patterns of the fallen ones. That's why they are called 'fallen' ones – because they believe they fell from a higher state, which is not true. Nature is not a hierarchy like they believe it to be.

"and the more condensed all beings become as one gestalt entity with no separation showing how the only thing that exists is the Source/God"

You're breaking the definition of what a source is. The river is not the source. God is not the source. God is the source and the river at the same time. You wanting to got back to the source like a fish swimming against the stream actually misses the reality that you are already a part of God. You don't need to 'go back' as if the river is leading you in the wrong direction – just follow the river, as there's a good reason why God created it.

All of the talk about higher spiritual realms and the like. I can only suspect that some higher master of enlightenment or whatever you might want to call it is going to have measurable practical results from that endeavor, be it telekinesis, or clairyvoyance, or astral travel.

I suspect that a lot of Buddhist monks actually could engage in these abilities but they've been too indoctrinated. They meditate ceaselessly but then they never actually utilize it. It's like maintaining a car without ever actually trying to drive it.

Astral travel is when you leave your body. Also called OBE out of body experience. R. Monroe, and many others compare also Tom Brown jr. (Das Wissen der Wildnis!) and the Holonauts. (https://cropfm.at/archive/show/holonauten2)

You can train that. There are several levels:
Moving trough the real world, outer space and also to other "dimensions".

@Elemi

So you're talking about the ISBE leaving the physical body. How do you provide evidence of that? This is not the trivial question it seems to be: The ISBE needs to be connected to a body to be able to interact with our physical world. From our point of view, an ISBE outside the body is just not there.

So how do we utilize astral travel when you can't even prove that it's not just a dream?