Yes, trust the data.. Were the same interference blocking protocols used here as with the et related targets?

The DNC will be interesting...

I posted about this a few days ago. Yes, it didn't seem too chaotic. However, I think in at least one of the sessions, (Yeme Jeaneé, I think ?) it was said that it seemed the DNC was likely to be the more chaotic one.

I wondered if the timeline kind of got altered after the shooting in Pennsylvania a couple of weeks ago. Also security services supposedly read Farsight too. It would not surprise me if security at the RNC got ramped up recently.

Also, the recent remote viewing experiment earlier this year where "Biden wins" seems irrelevant anymore. I actually pointed out months ago that it was a fairly big assumption that Biden would even make it to November to win the election, given his age.

I actually have felt it would be Trump vs. Harris for a while. I think there was a scene described in that remote viewing project a couple of years ago about January 2025 where in the midst of this chaos there is a big meeting between a male and female on some steps of some building while the chaos is unfolding. I always pictured it to be Harris and Trump.

The good news is I'm feeling somewhat better about the chance of there not be a civil war type thing in 2025. Farsight is cool but civil war is a prediction I'd rather them get wrong. As Yoda once said...always in motion is the future...so it's hard to tell what will happen. There seem to be pathways off the civil war track now though. With Biden dropping out, I think the Democrats are at least saying the right things and setting a good example in that too much power shouldn't reside in just one person. I guess a lot of things can still happen though. I'm sensing a really wide range of outcomes is possible...ranging from chaos to a positive national learning experience or both. We'll see.

Yeah, the disclosure of this reality transcends politics and everything else for sure. I wonder if knowing truth about our origins etc. might draw us closer together?

No remote viewer is 100%. Doesn’t mean it was a different timeline. The viewers have been getting similar targets regarding politics. The viewers start to make their own assumptions, she said a few of them during the session. If not perfectly set aside can ruin the session.

I am thinking this. All possible groups would and could be monitored world wide using a powerful AI in a very big computer. Farsight would be swept up in this type of surveillance. Surveillance by FBI, CIA and lots of other 3 letter agencies.

Now if Farsight reports in its little group that they see someone losing an election or that some political figure will be t-ar3eted in July etc then people and security agencies will be notified. Or, there is going to be some groups causing lots of violence at a convention. A simple changing of schedules, or beefing up of security teams or moving heavier concrete blocks up around a building can an would alter security threats. Or, say arresting one or two top trouble makers first could change thing considerably.

Therefor I wonder if by reporting all our finding for everyone to see especially American Security agencies to see -- if that automatically changes everything. The ability to "see" what's going to happen becomes less and less accurate because those in power are taking notice and changing plans and tactics.

So Farsight could seeing accurate things as It looks down its "divining telescope" BUT at the other end of the telescope where the action is taking place others have adapted and changed their behavior and thereby changed the "remote viewing outcome". This is because they have detected that they are being detected !

A simplified scenario. Lets say because Billy's father works at a big telephone company - Billy therefor (in this scenario) can tell that Bobby is going to get a punch in the nose by the town bully(lets call him Alfred). Lets say Billy's dad for some reason tells Billy everything he discovers at the breakfast table.

EXACTLY LIKE FARSIGHT DOES ON ITS FARSIGHT WEBSITE !

So Alfred has blabbed to all his buddies (on the telephone) that he is going to punch Bobby in the nose on Monday lunch time, right around 12 o'clock when everyone flocks through the one door to the lunchroom.

But, Billy too has blabbed the news to everyone else in the town and it is well known all over town what is predicted to happen. If Billy had kept the news to himself - then the action would have happened and Bobby would get a bloody nose by Alfred.

But because even Bobby is aware of it now - he changes his plans and calls in sick for school and never shows up for one week. And in fact Bobby runs away and joins the Circus.

That's what I think is starting to happen every where. The only way to be "accurate" would be if we all met in secret in the forest behind the big elm tree, and kept every thing farsight discovered secret - and I don't think that can happen.

Its like the 2 slit experiment - the system knows its being watched and so it instead does something else. Then everyone says, "well Farsight is inaccurate." So the only way things could be perceived and stay accurate is not to tell what has been discovered but to swear everyone to secrecy and even that could be hacked in theory somehow.

I think you guys are uncovering a big problem with remote viewing. Remote viewing can only stay accurate if it also stays secret.

Because the biggest component of a sneaky plan is to have secrecy - to keep it hidden. Remote viewing automatically sheds light on that plan and the more popular a remote viewing site becomes, the more the public learns about the predicted future. Then the more other people change their plans and then the "more inaccurate" Farsight becomes.

This seems to be something that points to the---- end of Farsight-----and other sites like it.

But lets just say Farsights purpose is not to find out the future but to reveal the evil being plotted. If it reports the evil being plotted that automatically thwarts the evil. Farsight has super powers which is a super "flashlight". That flash light exposing all the cockroaches in the darkness and sets them to scatter and run for the hills. And we all live to see another day !

Everything must remain secret ! And truly one could say timelines are being changed.

However an even stranger thing could be said. It is that Farsight must continue to report its finding because -- REMOTE VIEWING IS THE ENGINE THAT IS CHANGING THE FUTURE ! By uncovering the sneaky secrets; that then alters the plans of the sneaky planners - and then a kinder plan emerges.

You guys are onto something really big !

Just an opinion

What might be the reasons for the miss of the chaos prediction?
I have three suggestions:

1. Timelines
The timeline has been changed when Trump turned his head and the bullet missed him. As a follow up, the security measures at the convention have been improved and the plan of the deep state to provoke riots there has been skipped.

2. Target contamination/bias
The tasker was too focused on the idea that riots will happen on both conventions.

3. Interference
That would mean all or most FS data have been corrupted.

We would need the Trump assasination forecast data to be published for further discussion and analysis.

i believe the sessions were good, and besides, Courtney did said the target was about the worst case scenario, well since there are several timelines occurring at the same time what they were trying to figuring out was the worst timeline that could happen and not what it is going to happen, besides the deep state is strategizing everything until the last hour it is obvious there was a chance for the "worst case scenario" to not happen, or at least to that extent. Taking into consideration also that the project was created with the intention and knowing that the intelligence sees it!
There is a lot of swirling momentum happening now, energy is being displaced all over the place.

It's still not clear at this point if any of the anti-interference protocols/techniques were in place. I'm curious. Again, it my belief that anytime you have multiple viewers perceiving simililar things.....you got something. We have seen that on multiple other projects here.

My problem with this and other viewings are the questions. I find it leading to ask about… as in this case…to describe the worse thing to happen at the conventions, as apposed to …what, if anything, happened outside. In other words, the questions are asking to find something that may not be there. The questions are assuming there will be a negative event and to describe it, and that is what the viewers did. I can’t help but feel that the bias, opinions and assumptions of the questioner are influencing and leading the viewer to a specific result. A thumb is being applied to the scales and skewing the results. These leading biased questions are occurring more and more and I can’t take any of this serious anymore. The questions “what was, what is, what will be” should not be followed by “ and “find this”. If there is a “this” or a “there there”, that should be left to the viewer to find on their own without influence….IF ….. it exists.

I wonder if the following

It was said (as I remember it) that Joe Biden would leave as Leader at the Democratic National Convention. Now It didn't seem to say specifically but I thought it would be a sort of mini coup if you will. That it would be announced at the convention, and another candidate would be picked shortly after when several candidates would announce their decisions to attempt to become the democratic nominee.

But what seems to have happened is Kamala has been "anointed" as the the president in waiting instead of that because Biden announced he was leaving early. In other words everyone has backed her so it seems to be a done deal. But she is not yet the nominee, yet only one within the public forum.

If Joe Biden had not announced he was leaving till much later perhaps that violence might have happened at the RNC because democrat supporters would have sensed they were in trouble and decided to protest the RNC.

So one side (the Democrat's) changed their plan to wait later and that changed that part of the timeline. Now did they look at Farsights data ? No Idea. But I think there is some evidence that one side did something different.

Because of this I wonder if Farsight should do another Remote View of who will be the most likely candidate to win the election. It seemed everyone said Trump (the orange man) would win.

But I wonder if there could now be a completely different result? If there is a different result seen in a remote view I wonder if that isn't evidence that "we" have moved to a different reality and not realize it . Maybe because this shift from one reality or timeline is actually happening all the time.

If there still isn't going to be a change at the convention. If Kamala stays in the race of popularity roughly even with Trump then Kamala stays as nominee and is crowned the Democrats choice. However if say at a debate with Trump she totally fails and polls immediately drop to say more than 5 points where she started and keeps sliding down say 10 points below Trump then I say someone else gets chosen at the democratic convention. Newsome ? One remote viewer at Future Forcasting said the winner of the National election wears a ring on his finger. I looked at several videos of Trump and Kennedy and could see no ring on fingers on their fingers. BUT one video I looked at had Newsom with a ring on his finger. Very few males wear a ring on their left hand 4th finger. Newsom does.

If she stays- I say she could win. If Trump runs circles around her in a debate to where she says Germany is in Africa or America loves IRAN and North Korea and similar then people will get alarmed. If she just doesn't do very well then that's actually a win for her. She didn't fall flat on her face and that's ok to come back from. CNN will say she has lots of great advisors to help her out in the future; A future as president of the USA.

If Kamala is seen to be Ok or not a disaster in the publics mind then I think a lot of votes originally sitting with Kennedy will drift back to Kamala and not to Trump. Lets say only 30 % that then will push Kamala ahead of Trump.

I wonder if farsight shouldn't look for evidence of a time line shift change, by looking for a significant drop in accuracy of their predictions right around the time of the attempted shooting - say 1 month before and see of that data and that data specifically shows a great drop in accuracy compared to much before and much later ?
Just a thought