More and more disclosure lately in the mainstream. Much of this is to do with them getting the populace used to the idea of aliens among us. They will more than likely use it as a last ditch scenario for a planned fake alien invasion/landing using Bluebeam and the T3RB and other equipment they have.

'10-foot-tall people' discovered by archaeologists in Nevada cave

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/10-foot-tall-people-discovered-by-archaeologists-in-nevada-cave/ar-BB1oQRf2?ocid=mailsignout&pc=U591&cvid=62e8d66a92ba47dd8c343e322ceac6d8&ei=14

So essentially the Independence Day plot.

"The idea is to create ALIEN terror events and pretend a group of ALIENS are spreading terror."

But that wouldn't be fake, right? They would need real terror events to be believable, especially after mainstream media has lost its credibility. So it's a false flag psy-op.

But, if I were the good guys, what would hinder me to attack the crafts that are carrying out the false flag attacks? People would see UFOs fighting, and that would raise questions, right? And people would want to speak to the ones that are helping humanity, and thank them, right?

Playing that scenario would only make sense if both parties, the terrorists and the helpers, were the bad guys. So, the goal would be to get the approval of the public when the helpers start to take over the governments, like the Companions in the Earth: Final Conflict show. And they wouldn't want to dismantle the death traps.

But how does that scenario serve the bad ETs at all? When the existence of ETs is disclosed and the terror is stopped eventually, people would want to have the technology, and they would want to have the freedom to leave Earth and travel in space, just like the ETs. It would be much harder to maintain Earth as a prison. It would cost much more energy. Why would they do that?

Why would they initiate a fake invasion scenario when there's good guys who will take the opportunity to intervene? And why would they initiate it when there's no good guys who threaten them?

I gave this a little bit more thought, so here's a theory:

They play the problem-reaction-solution game, like I described above. ET terrorists spread terror, ET helpers attack the terrorists, humans will be thankful and ally with the helping ETs. The question is: Why would the bad ETs want to do that?

The only plausible scenario I see is that the bad ETs want to integrate humanity into their empire as a military force. They establish a global fascist government, comparable to the one you see in the movie Starship Troopers. Driven by good old propaganda, humans are then send out to fight "the Bugs" on behalf of the Empire.

https://www.livescience.com/63958-war-of-the-worlds-aliens.html

'Alien Invasion' Radio Broadcast Terrified Listeners 80 Years Ago. Would E.T. Contact Cause Panic Today?

"They wanted to increase the population, for slave labour and food etc., so they all hid and pretended there are no aliens so humanity would develop until it's ripe for the harvest."

Well, that would be the Stargate: Atlantis plot, where the so called Wraith were harvesting humans throughout the galaxy. And in that show, the Wraith were smart enough to scatter humans in the galaxy such that they weren't able to develop technology. The Wraith hopped from one planet to another, making the harvest as cost-efficient as possible.

Letting a population develop like humanity on Earth seems to be a dumb strategy. It also seems to be dumb to crash UFOs so humans get even more technology.

If you ask me, there are ETs interfering with the "business" on Earth, such that the bad ETs are cornered and cannot implement their strategy anymore. That could be the reason why they are shipping humans to other planets – they are already preparing for their loss of Earth.

Bombshell UFO hearings to take place in Congress as new footage emerges of 'huge' craft near US nuclear weapons base!!! 15 September 2024

Another round of public UFO hearings are in store for Congress within mere weeks, according to a senior member of the Senate's Armed Services Committee.

The new Senate hearing, which could arrive as early as September, follows another bizarre summer of US military whistleblower claims about these baffling airborne mysteries — including ex-Pentagon official Luis Elizondo's revelations that he personally handled an 'alien' implant removed from a veteran servicemember.

New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who confirmed the hearing, said: 'It's a priority for me because I think it's very important we continue to make things publicly available.'

The Capitol Hill inquiry also comes as many American civilians have also reported their own UFO sightings, which Sen. Gillibrand said she hopes will soon be added to the investigative purview of the Pentagon's only one-year-old UFO hunting office.

Just days ago, in fact, witnesses taped what one called a 'huge' UFO with 'tons of blinking and spinning lights' 60 miles from a US Air Force nuclear weapons base.

That sighting — filmed from Choteau Montana and hour's drive northwest of storied UFO hotspot Malmstrom Air Force Base — left one witness 'shaking and crying from the experience,' according to her husband, who posted the encounter to Reddit.

'The photos aren't scary,' the anonymous poster noted, 'but seeing what you truly believe to be a massive object in the silent night sky going over YOUR head and home carries a lot more emotional weight in person.'

The UFO, which can mostly be seen by 'a rotating orange/red light on the bottom' after it shifted from appearing like a long, gleaming white streak, was not one of Elon Musk's Starlink satellite trains commonly mistaken for alien craft, the witness said.

'I'm familiar with Starlink videos,' he emphasized. 'While we were watching the object it was very apparent that the lights were around the silhouette of a large craft.'