I had a subscription a while back but canceled it. I just can't listen to all the explanations about remote viewing. It seems to take up half of each session. It is excruciatingly redundant. I tried one of your previews again today, but I still can't take it. You have plenty videos that describe the process to refer to. There is is no need to keep explaining it over and over again. I only say this because I think it could help the your channel out. Just get to the point please. I feel like I have to sift through a whole hour just to get 3 minutes of interesting information.

Well, Courtney has this habit of treating everybody as a newcomer who is completely unaware of RV.

I've read his research book, so I'm kind of used to being treated that way by Farsight, and I agree, some people just find it annoying.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Remote-Viewing-Science-Nonphysical-Perception/dp/0976676214

I'm posting because, really, there is only one RV protocol. "Free Response Anomalous Cognition Within A Double Blind Protocol". As opposed to "Forced Choice Anomalous..." etc etc etc.

The actual METHOD by a which a viewer gets data and does a session record does not matter, but the protocol (Communication standard) of the viewer being blind to the target, having no contact with anybody that does know the target, is recognized across the board of RV, way way beyond the restrictions of Farsight and their particular SRV method.

It keeps people HONEST. And there are plenty of unscrupulous people setting up targets and then lying about what the target really was. (I've been around RV land for about 20 years now as a viewer, tasker and analyst).

My point is, Farsight aren't really aiming just to entertain people. Unlike other purveyors of RV merchandise.

I don't buy everything Courtney says as 100% true, but if you think you can do better, then do better. It's entirely up to you what you do with RV.

"I just can't listen to all the explanations about remote viewing."

Just skip it.

I think the original post is a complaint shared by many, but that's not to say that Farsight should change its MO.

Farsight has hinted in some ways that they welcome competition, in fact I think they depend on it. Farsight being the world venue for remote viewing is a very sad idea. It needs to become an industry. Take what they do and make a version that's cooler, sleeker, better. That's our job now.

That aside, I too felt impatient. What's with all this ideograms and hard soft wet or mushy, etc.

Lo and behold, for some of us we don't need anything like that. I've gotten solid hits just probing something like a dot, and randomly guessing. This stuff works and if that doesn't blow someone's mind away then I guess they do belong in front of hollywood movies, gurgling saliva in front of million dollar one-second special effects. Hopefully we'll be able to take them down when they're programmed grey slaves.

"they do belong in front of hollywood movies, gurgling saliva in front of million dollar one-second special effects. Hopefully we'll be able to take them down when they're programmed grey slaves."

When you were busy pillaging your CQV account - did you ever think about the economic repurcussions in terms of there being less money around to pay for credit?

I mention this as you seem to be great at sneering at other people's decisions (me too) but when it comes to acknowledging your own lack of foresight, you are clueless?

Have a think here Tazz. What do you want? More stress and chaos in your life? Or less?

I'm definitely aiming for less stress in my life, Done my bit, time for other people to work off their slack.

"I've gotten solid hits just probing something like a dot, and randomly guessing."

When looking at how remote viewing evolved, it's all logical. It began in the military with a military mindset of clear structures and rigid exercises. When civilians started to remote view, it became less rigid. I think there's a sweet spot in the middle to discover. Doing it blind is important. Having an understanding of what an AOL is, is important. Reducing stress is important. But you don't have to be rigid at all. It's more like having fun with a game.

If you have fun doing it, you're doing it right.

Hi Stephen
I don't usually mind listening to the introduction to each video - but I do agree there was one recently where I felt it was a long advertisement - maybe that's the one you're talking about - but funny, I don't know why I was thinking 'OK, move it along here' - I don't think it was much different from any others. I just wanted to know the Target and skip to the sessions.

When I'm in that mood, I watch on 1.25 or 1.50 video speed 😁