We will see if in this context "disclosure" includes also what we would mean this term has to include: ETs and backengineering projects. I have my doubts with that, but maybe Trump is afraid loosing conservative votes if he goes to far with this topic before the election... Nontheless interesting! Thanks for sharing!

Assuming that voting isn't rigged to whatever they want, and he doesn't know

What should they have done to him?

What did they do to Assange?

Assange released classified documents and was charged with Espionage Act violations. He literally broke the law, so not persecuting him would make the state look inconsequential.

Tucker interviewed Putin as a journalist. He didn't break any law. So what should they have done to him? Persecuting him for talking? Of course they would love to do that, but there's no legal basis.

That's the point, they are not really on opposite sites. David Icke calls it "opposames". As long as the people are fighting each other and not the root cause, pawns like Hillary don't get the permission to disappear a well known public figure, because of the Karmic consequences that need to be considered.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters