I encourage everyone reading this to produce your own affidavit. It can be as simple or as complicated as you want.

You have to literally say on a document -- what your alignment is, where you swear your allegiances to.

It sounds weird, maybe overly simplistic, and I'm pretty much guaranteed to get some significant trolling on the matter (and yes even some legitimate non-troll challenges)

But anyway. It's the only thing that makes sense to me.

I know that this idea that we've been contracted into giving up our power seems ludicrous in terms of the fact thst I never asked to be shoved around with taxes and court and land grabs but the fact that I don't really stake a claim in where my loyalties lie does in fact say something about my own integrity.

Much evidence is pointing to the fact that all of this is real. If I'm wrong, tgen you just wasted some time writing a meaningless statement. But if I'm right, even partly right, won't you be glad you did it?

I'm currently writing one, I'll post it here when I'm done

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

I align with Freedom, Free-Will, the Light Sovereign Power, True-Light, Truth, Peace, Non-Dogmatism.

Given I'm more Chaotic Good - Neutral Good (with some Neutral in there as well), the idea of writing an affidavit is anathema to me :D :D :D

We need to clarify how the different ideologies handle an affidavit:

Evil: Pledge allegiance to us or suffer consequences.

Good: Pledge allegiance to truth or suffer consequences.

Neutral: Pledge allegiance to nothing or suffer consequences.

😉

"If I'm wrong, then you just wasted some time writing a meaningless statement."

No statement is meaningless.

And very important: You can change your mind at every point in time. At least that's how a good being will see it. Holding people captive by contract is what the devil does.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

"you have to think very carefully about what exactly makes an item or individual or space/time encounter unique."

Yes, that's why I say: No statement is meaningless.

It's a form of respect towards others, like, I assume they are unique to begin with, and then look at their responses. Every response has a meaning attached to it, because everybody is aligned with some idea as part of their identity. The responses reveal the alignment, even if the person responding doesn't want to reveal anything.

An affidavit for that matter means that a person is acting instead of just reacting. You give a response in advance, out of an understanding of responsibility (response ability). It's like having a name plate at the front door of your house so people don't have to assume who is living there.

"So this striving of yours against a "prison planet" idea is essentially making you more dependent on an idea that isn't true for everybody anyway."

It doesn't matter what is true for them (which actually is just perception or ignorance thereof) – it only matters what is true in reality. Is this actually a prison planet? If so, the perspective of anybody who doesn't want it to be true is not helpful.

I'm not a friend of ruling out possibilities before they are proven false.

So, the question is: How do we recognize truth? Welcome to the fascinating philosophical field of epistemology. Most people reject the notion that there is an absolute truth just because they don't know how to see it. Some reject it because their ego doesn't want to be false.

Ask yourself: Why is the illusion of neutrality so popular? Who punishes you for being false? Follow that question and you will find out: It's always evil that wants you to be neutral in order to incapacitate (neutralize) you. For example, a violent father who hits his child for backtalk, because he is unable or unwilling to debate with reason.

So many people are still aligned with their violent parents and don't even know it. Pretending to be neutral feels like a "safe spot", because not talking back to violent parents actually was safer in the past.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

A Company Family: The untold history of Obama and the CIA
By Jeremy Kuzmarov (Posted Oct 07, 2021)

Originally published: CovertAction Magazine on October 1, 2021 (more by CovertAction Magazine)

https://mronline.org/2021/10/07/a-company-family-the-untold-history-of-obama-and-the-cia/

Obama and His Family Tied to CIA for Years
Friday, 3 September 2010, 10:59 am
Opinion: Sherwood Ross

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1009/S00027/obama-and-his-family-tied-to-cia-for-years.htm

It was revealed recently that Vice President Dick Cheney and Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama are distant cousins.

This week, thanks to a New York Post story about genealogy, we're getting a glimpse at the rather surprising family tree of President Bush himself, reports CBS News Early Show national correspondent Tracy Smith.

We all know who the president's father is, but what about his cousins?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-famous-family-tree/

"Oh plenty of people have avoided the consequences."

No. It just looks like that to you because of your limited perception.

"What do they all have in common? Ruthless, privaleged and wealthy."

Privilege doesn't last long, karmically speaking.