[Note: Also a «tl;dr» for those who wish to skip to the end]

Although there seems to have been a decent turn-out for the most-recent bi-weekly Far-Sight Spot-Lights on Y-T, the «title» of the video would also be likely to grab more attention when key-words are included that many people are paying attention to and actively searching for, related to key-word searches (so, yes, in the key-words section when uploading or «tagging» those videos, drones, new york, new jersey, also work, even if not necessarily entirely accurate to call all of them drones).

This is based on my experience with past article-writing & technical-knowledge combined with what I had learned about advertising & marketing. Back then, you even wanted to input «mis-spelled» key-words on purpose, and, even intentionally, because, many people do mis-spell a lot of common words, but, these days it's not as much of an advantage because of the auto-correction (to spelling) & suggested/related key-words algorithm(s). The «latest» is basically titled «They have arrived!» (and indeed «they» have), but, if «over more than just NY & NJ» were also added to the title, resulting in «They have arrived over more than just NY & NJ!» then you are being really specific.

See, when it comes to on-line dominance, provided that you are the one with the first-mover advantage (and first-mover advantage is extremely important in the on-line «reputation» environment; especially when/while there isn't all of that totalitarian-censorship for the «history-writers» to «dictate» their own «narrative-control» over the masses, such as from those who like to «scare» everybody with the number 6, you know, six feet apart, six million of a group that I won't mention for both obvious & not-so-obvious reasons, six feet under, something to do with said number being displayed 3x in a row, etc.), that is how the public will view things.

The most-recent zoom-meeting had a question posed as to «why don't we ever see [kung fu] in the UFC ?» and one answer is that we actually do see it, but, most people don't recognise it for being kung fu; one guy I knew over at Washington-State (a Hapkido-instructor) respected my knowledge & abilities in the martial arts, me being pretty much the only guy he had ever come across who already knew all of the techniques that he was familiar with (or our own version of it), and, our style/system has a «throwing» technique called Beng Tiao, its origin being one that can be traced back to Shuai Jiao, a technique that involves throwing an opponent via leg-lifting them into the air; well, one day, when he was watching the UFC whilst I was over visiting, he saw someone on the UFC use a «beng tiao» (or tried to) throw, then he got all excited, pointing out all wide-eyed...: «That's Beng-Tiao!» (this is a Kung Fu throw), how-ever, when it comes to the public, what is the public going to say ? They're going to say that the guy did «wrestling» (which is not technically wrong, but, it's not a Western-wrestling throwing technique; it's literally a Shuai-Jiao technique, and, Shuai Jiao does loosely translate into Chinese-Wrestling) rather than Kung Fu (and the only reason many people who watch the UFC think Kung Fu is useless or that TCMA doesn't work for fighting is because, according to our Grand-Master, there are a lot of people out there teaching Kung Fu who don't actually know how to actually fight using Kung Fu; go ahead, try Remote-Viewing all of the «fights» he has ever been in ever since he retired from being a five-year-undefeated champion at the International Fighting Tournaments at Taiwan in order to teach the Combat-System here at America; heck, I would even go so far as to do Skill-Level Comparisons between him & ANY of the fighters that have EVER been seen on the UFC via Remote-Viewing if that's possible to do via Remote-Viewing; it can probably be done like a Time-Line Fore-Cast Prediction similarly to how Remote-Viewings have been done as to what would happen if one particular Candidate was Elected for President versus another Candidate). The point of this «story» is that, the MORE you can get MORE «attention» via the Social-Media Platforms (with Y-T obviously being the currently dominant one in which to reach a large audience-base due to how ALL of the search-engines always seem to «default» to it when doing video-searches), the MORE you can establish a hopefully good «meme» or «popularise» something OVER what the «Narrative-Controllers» may try to get the masses to believe (but of course we already know that much thus far).

tl;dr: Adding a few target key-words into your video-titles for the Far-Sight Bi-Weekly Spot-Light will definitely help to increase the amount of attention it gets & the click-through rates. I gave the example of how «They have arrived!» would grab more attention and get people who are specifically looking for information being covered & talked about by the «news» if worded as something like... «They have arrived! And it's world-wide! Not just NY & NJ!» (I call this the «piggy-back» method; if the «news» is actively running stories about Covid, stick Covid into the title; if the «news» is actively running stories about «Iran drones» then stick «Iran drones» into the title, etc.)