This was a longer meeting with some passion - or punches - whichever way you see it.
I think Intysam is so right - we need to look ahead. The way earth humans steer the time ahead is crucial. The decades ahead are not set in stone yet.

We need to look at who would represent some of our concerns - the human aspect - to those who we can question, who are transparent and ethical, to make the best choices on behalf of this planet - our planet - if we remember what 'best choices' are any more. We are almost at the point where we no longer know what a real scientist truly is, a real politician, doctor, academic, leader is.
Is there already a group of 'Controllers' (Earth humans) who have declared themselves the ones who are going to sort this out? Who are they? Are we going to be sprung with a group who feels they represent us better? We have a lot of catching up to do but looking at the whole thing with very different eyes and minds. What I don't want is to see a bunch of no-clue Politicians, money hungry Military Dignitaries, righteous religious zealots, legals, self-appointed emissaries, representatives, advocates, or lobbyists that were not chosen by the same pests that got us into this mess.

Will we be looking at more 'Contracts' in the future - how will the Law work now?
This is decades in the making if it's to be a new structure for a new free world thinking.
What we lay down now is the scaffolding for the future. It will be and is for all of us - and for our generations to come - which we are part of.
I think there is a big difference to come back here when a planet is free of its chains, slaves no more, and when you want to come back you can make that decision - not because you were forced to.

I know Aziz or Courtney were saying it still could be bad - and get worst before its better.
But we do need to think ahead, be on the lookout for those who are guiding us into the future, and what qualifications, and plans that they have. Guide the young now - they're the ones that will have to live with what we do, later.

Really enjoyed listening to this board meeting and the different points the panel made.

Did any one else catch the implications behind the mention of the backing of some faction in the military-industrial complex, and Aziz's comment about this being something like a corporate takeover (of the planet). Does this then look like a military coup, by the Space Corp? Or do they just go for it, and announce the formation of Starfleet? The good will they'd earn from constructing a new civilization along those lines would earn a lot of instant support, with much less arguing over basic principles, I think.

@Joel,
I did, and I believe that there is already a complex and massive market out there, one that we are already involved in and have been for a long time. Much of it has nothing to do with us as well. It's an analogy from Aziz that I think is necessary to look at. Though there is already a corporate (to use a word) structure in place. If we are using the Earth's resources, people, planet - are we by birth right, silent shareholders as we spend our mortal time here, or caretakers maybe - we don't need another structure of being unpaid slaves, in debt from our first breath to our last, and we don't need someone in place overseeing the process that is shady as hell. Can we do this? Can we do this differently?

2:56

Ross Coulthart talks about "nation state sized drones"

This isn't random either - I find it interesting that Google has announced 'Willow' on around the 9th December 2024. The fastest quantum chip ever - so fast that a computation that would take the next faster computer 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to complete, takes Willow under 5 minutes. A.I is now coupled with this chip - This is massive news as well.

No wonder 'Chips' were a very big deal in 23-24.

All of what can be seen for the future, good and bad, will happen exponentially faster with this chip. Whether they're placed in your fridge, or in your brain.
This is how fast and efficiently the internet can be censored - or it can write the response you want to hear - or tell you something that is not correct.

There are of course fantastic things this can do as well.
It's just who has the purpose and the intent, and the control over it.

Meet Willow, our state-of-the-art quantum chip
YouTube: Google Quantum AI Channel

UFO twitter still won't directly talk about or link to farsight but David Windt and I shilled it hard enough that they indirectly talk about it.

https://x.com/528vibes/status/1871308400694301078
Some people contacted the operators of the drones - apparently the operators are about to bring out bigger and better models - also more visible.

If you’re in NJ or surrounding areas, get your cameras out

Very good. I'd like to see better footage. What we have seen so far is not very compelling ... The witness reports have a much higher value than the blurry pictures of some lights in the sky, which indeed might be human drones. We need close-ups and more than one perspective/observer. And even then, the ET origin may be dismissed for e.g. Black Tech. At the end, we will need physical proof to be credible.

Recorded 22 Dec 2024
Cliff Hight has made his opinion known about the ETs and the Farsight ET Board Meetings, Courtney Brown, and the Bigger Ships.

Cliff doesn't share his vid's so you'll have to search YouTube
Search: Cliff High Scifi World - Saturation By Late Feb - Clif High Explorers' Guide To Scifi World

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/saturation-by-late-feb
~17:55

well, that was a bit harsh.

but not without a few points :

"... it's going to be really a um a traumatic period for
lots of people - not only what the UFOs is flying over their their heads but what
it does to to the institutions that they used to work for.

Because a lot of these institutions are going to go [ s__t ] themselves out
you know?

Why in the [ f__k ] would you go take physics from
Harvard or Yale or even go to MIT if they can't explain how those
UFOs are flying over your head and can and hover stationary against 120 mile per hour
wind for five hours?"

So according to Cliff High 5 remote viewers are delusional?! incredible!

I can list numerous times where Cliff High has been way off. Martin Armstrong on the other hand not so much. I would put my money on armstrongs computer program Socrates over Cliff high. Armstrong has some strong prediction which seem to parallel farsight. For example, from 2025-2027 we go through a global civil war. The list goes on and on.