In the Spotlight 26 December 2024, Courtney said this after 2 minutes:

"Everybody is a psyop. Anyone who is trying to influence public opinion, things like that, is a psy-op. We have often told you: Farsight is a psy-op. So, any group that is trying to influence public opinion in any way shape or form – the official definition of psy-ops often involves military ideas of psychological information, manipulation to get certain outcomes, to you know influence the public in certain ways – but in reality, political parties are psy-ops, religions are psy-ops, any group that's trying to influence the public are a psy-op, for whatever reason. Well, the ETs are no different – they are psy-ops. And so we, you know, we are not saying psy-ops... psy-ops can be good or they can be bad, it could be all types."

Here's a very important point: What do most people mean when they use the word "manipulation"?

As far as I'm concerned, people are speaking of manipulation when a person or group isn't telling the truth, but chooses to lie instead or to omit important parts of the truth. This is done to change the outcome in comparison to what the outcome would be if the truth was told instead.

So, when the so called good ETs see themselves as a psy-op that manipulates the public, I have the following question:

What part of the truth is left out, and why?

Why do they still believe that a psy-op (manipulation of public) is necessary? Because the "zombies" can't handle the truth? But how can that be disclosure then? How can you say "We want full disclosure", but first, we need to manipulate the public...

How can we know when the manipulation stops?

The correct answer to that would be: Don't believe the ETs, either good or bad, as long as they are willing to manipulate you.

So, how can we know that the "library" provided by Farsight is not manipulated?

I know, we should start remote viewing ourselves and cross-examine everything. But: How do we know that the ETs don't manipulate our remote viewing data? They already admitted that they are able to do that, and because of that, we can't trust any remote viewing data anymore.

Do you see the problem? The power differential regarding psychic powers is too big, and because of that, it would be wiser to not remote view at all and stick with logical reasoning and objective evidence.

I don't want to remote view anymore, because of how Farsight presented the good ETs (without answering important questions).

Disclosure means truth, not manipulation.

You don't want to remote view anymore because you understand nothing but then RVing challenges your safe space and you're scared to go outside of your safe space lmao.

Manuel, truth can be one of the most powerful psyops.

Those that put in the work can sense energy and energy cannot be hidden. This is the difference between those who are spiritual and those who live on the material plane only and can't go past their mental thoughts/limitations. Even if not right away, a person can eventually see through any veil used as a disguise by any entity. It's not hard. It applies to physical humans as well. They give off energy through their aura and that can be trained to he sensed as well.

"it's up to the one seeking information to figure it out"

With that premise, being lied to is okay because you fall for it. Sounds evil to me.

"truth can be one of the most powerful psyops"

Here's another point: If telling the truth is a psy-op, and telling lies is a psy-op, then all communication is a psy-op. I suggest that we stick with the term communication for that, because communicating with each other is not always an "operation". The term operation implies that something has been planned in order to change the outcome. It's a sophisticated strategy. But you don't need a strategy to tell the truth – you just do it.

What is a Psyop ?

But first I just heard that ANYTHING can be a psyop. And if we just kept going, it is said the entire Universe is some kind of simulation or perhaps a psyop.

So,

To narrow it down

I think a Psyop is a manipulation, and its created to benefit the creator of it, and to be a determent for the person or group it is directed at. It could be true there is a net benefit to the group that its directed at, but always there was a better outcome for that directed group. Something that would have been better for them.

And therefor Farsight is not a Psyop.

The original members of Farsight believe, that their actions and information is best for humanity. I am quite sure of that. (however I do agree its possible for them to be influenced to then influence us- its always a possibility)

But still, you have heard criticism from me - And I'm one of the biggest critics. But only when I feel their being naive or missing important points, and therefor fooled.

But I never believe for a second that original members of Farsight were being deceitful. So for me, a Psyop is a deceitful and manipulative process to try and get you/us to pick the lessor benefit for us (the target) and the greater benefit for the creator of the Psyop. And that was just an opinion. Not a fact.

(oh and I just tried to influence you right up there) - Now I suppose that was a psyop ? If we keep going to the idea that EVERYTHING IS A PSYOP ! Then we are going to drive ourselves crazy. But still knowing that organization do it (likely even on CNN) its good to know it exists so we can include it in our decisions.

psyop-- a possible definition

Psychological warfare (PSYWAR), or the basic aspects of modern psychological operations (PsyOp), have been known by many other names or terms, including Military Information Support Operations (MISO), Psy Ops, political warfare, "Hearts and Minds", and propaganda.

The term is used "to denote any action which is practiced mainly by psychological methods with the aim of evoking a planned psychological reaction in other people". Various techniques are used, and are aimed at influencing a target audience's value system, belief system, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior.

It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. It is also used to destroy the morale of enemies through tactics that aim to depress troops' psychological states.

Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals, and is not just limited to soldiers. Civilians of foreign territories can also be targeted by technology and media so as to cause an effect in the government of their country. There is evidence of psychological warfare throughout written history.

In modern times, psychological warfare efforts have been used extensively. Mass communication allows for direct communication with an enemy populace, and therefore has been used in many efforts. Social media channels and the internet allow for campaigns of disinformation and misinformation performed by agents anywhere in the world.