So, let's wrap it up.

Farsight looked into the death of Jeffrey Epstein, but didn't get correct results because the target was secured with some blocking technique that showed the viewers wrong data. This means that it is possible to manipulate what a remote viewer will see.

Farsight then revisited the target, but this time with an anti-blocking technique applied. Courtney describes how it works as follows: The mind of the remote viewer is channeled through the mind of one of the good ETs, and that person then helps to break the blocking. But in order to do that, Farsight needs to tell the ETs before the remote viewing begins.

Now here's the problem: This constellation allows the helping ET to manipulate the data as well. We just can't be sure wether they help or not. A possible scenario would be that the ETs themselves block a target just to make sure you are going through their channel. The result is a dependency relationship: Remote viewers will always want to use the anti-blocking technique in order to ensure good results. It so much sounds like the problem-reaction-solution model that the bad guys always apply in order to control us.

At the same time, Farsight tells us that we have to become independent from them. But they already established that RV data can be manipulated. So, it's only natural that we need to know how the anti-blocking works.

This means, we need to know why Farsight got incorrect results with Jeffrey Epstein the first time. What do we have to know in order to be able to avoid this kind of manipulation on our own?

The answer I got is: It's all about being honest about your intention.

You can avoid being manipulated if you honestly want to know the truth, and this means that you have to be open for not getting the results you want to have. In case of the viewer, this bias problem is eliminated through the method of blind viewing. The viewer doesn't know anything about the target and therefore is not biased. He or she can get an idea of the target while doing the session, but there's methods to put deductions (analytical overlay) aside and stick with the raw data.

This is not the case for the tasker. The tasker knows the target and therefore can put biases and emotions into it, and we already know that viewers can access it.

So, I was thinking about how the blocking techniques work in the first place. As everything is connected in nature, how do you even prevent someone from using these connections?

I found two answers to this, depending on what you are trying to see:

1. You are invading the private space of a being, thus violating it's right to be left alone. Also called trespassing. In that case, a blocking would be a right and works right away, meaning that every being can do it with its own energy. This doesn't mean that a being is strong enough to defend itself – the point is that everyone can do it in principle, and it's a right.

2. Any blocking that's trying to hide a crime or a truth that everybody has the right to know can't be done that easily. For example, a being has stolen a car and then wants to block remote viewers from seeing the deed. The being can protect itself and its own private space, but it can't protect the car, because it doesn't own the car. That's the entry point. So how can it be hidden?

There's only one possibility: Distraction. Make remote viewers look in the wrong way, or present them an illusion. And this does only work if the viewer or the tasker is biased. The blocking can use that bias in order to redirect the viewer, and if it's an illusion, it's essentially like viewing a fantasy or a dream.

Now, if the viewer wants to appease the tasker, the viewer can't see the difference. So, in order to avoid this kind of manipulation, there are two requirements:

1. The honest intention to not appease the tasker. The viewer must accept that he can be wrong.

2. The honest intention to see the truth. The tasker must accept that he can be wrong as well.

If those requirements are met, the only possibility left is to block the target with brute force, but that can be identified easily – the viewer will see that someone is trying to hide something.

With these considerations, I recommend that Farsight drops the "anti-blocking techniques" of the ETs and instead starts to get better at spotting bias based distractions. As far as I'm concerned, there's still a lot of bias on the tasker side, based in the belief that a certain worldview must be true. For example, the belief that it's not possible to murder a person within one of the most secure prisons in the country. It's a difficult truth that the state is not on the side of the people, but owned by the bad guys. It means that you are not as secure as you want to be. Rejecting these difficult truths is a bias that can be used against you, and that's not good.