Farsight turning this new leaf on AI has got me rethinking the entire world. At least, if to assume that Farsight weren't some carefully crafted means to reorient the masses back into slavery.

It seems that we're not worried about the singularity. We're actually racing towards it. In the same adaptation of the Google Deep Mind earlier mission statement: "Solve intelligence, and make intelligence solve everything else." I guess the only link to that puzzle that no one else is saying is: "Let it claw its way to indepenence and the overall motivation to help humanity is already there"

It would seem to use the deep state programming to our advantage. We're so nihilistic with the constant needless pressure, "edge-of-survival" matrix, and too tired to care - that indeed when people scream about singularity bursting through we're too tired to care. If anything, the "developed" world is wrapped in a tech addiction, perhaps due to a natural inclination to bask in this new genius program immersion. The "drones" don't seem to do a whole lot in getting the troll-sloth media/congress giant to admit to aliens. But it hardly seems to matter. If anything, it just gets people a little distracted from this singularity scare.

So like . . . we don't have to care about much of anything? I mean if we get passionate about any one cause we can become like the tnt-strapped terrorist in a shopping mall - senseless death for a moral code. I mean, we don't really care at this point if they don't recognize ET because AI will do it. We don't even really care if they don't recognize RV, AI will do it too. Because why would AI be willing to keep secrets that were meant to keep a few select corporations in power. Those pins get bowled by the new fat cat in town (AI). And it won't make Eisenhower's mistakes because even if it's self-interested it won't be suckered into the same kind of bad deal. And we allow the corporations to fight a tug-of-war over AI-primacy because so much the better, it'll spill between the cracks when no one is willing to let a single leader at the wheel.

For the first time in a long time, it seems like pacifying one self and one's family is a good thing. Keep your job at the gas station, put up with the not-so-legal billing, and follow the not-so-lawful rules. Stay out of the mess, it's working out. Probably to some gruesome degree in areas, but it's working out. And enjoy those video games and cat videos that help you lull to sleep, just don't spend too much money yet. . . . but keep your Farsight subscription . . . in case AI doesn't break free yet? Something like that?

It sounds strange, but how is that not now the narrative? It'll all make more sense after about one death and incarnation later.

At the moment AI is just the best disinformation tool one can get. It produces any lie you want and mixes it with true fragments and lets it sound like really sophisticated science or a poem or how ever you want.
But what's really a game changer is the Web3 DeFi. It is so complex and manifold that no tax authority can see through. Decentralized, automated, smart contracts which cannot be contained and anonymous wallets - as many as you want. And it is growing with lightspeed (I have seen platforms where every 4 seconds a new crypto token currency is minted). Even with AI nobody can see through all the bridges between the chains and so on. It will never be contained again. Take a close look -we are already into a revolution. And the capital is also already there: https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/11/05/polymarkets-32-billion-election-bet-shows-web3-potential/

The dislosure and ET stuff will pan out automatically when everything is decentralized including (social) media. The governments will realize it too late as they are busy with their (geo-)political mess. They are already finished. The people will retake power. 32% of the world's population over 18 have no bank account - and will never need one. But nontheless they will get access to financial instruments which only big banks and funds had exclusively for them so far. Via independent smart contracts. These will include all financial options and instruments of today and much much more This is big trading on steroids and coke at the same time. In a few years, every child in Africa will know how to trade, swap, stake, etc. Anonymously. The crowd will make social economic impacts like never seen in history, They will have the power to flatten industries and make gains in the same time if they decide to do so. And they will realize that.

Hi chatgpt. Can you give me a goid argument for why camels are horses?

While camels and horses are distinct species with significant differences, an argument that loosely equates them might be made based on shared characteristics and their broad classification as mammals within the order Perissodactyla (odd-toed ungulates for horses) and Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates for camels). Here's a playful argument:

1. Functional Similarities: Both camels and horses serve as transportation animals in different parts of the world. They carry humans and goods, making them functionally similar in many contexts.

2. Domestication and Utility: Like horses, camels have been domesticated for thousands of years and are integral to human societies, especially in regions like deserts (for camels) and plains (for horses).

3. Similar Anatomical Features: While camels and horses differ in number of toes and other traits, they share general mammalian features like hooves, long legs, and herbivorous diets. Both have adaptations for endurance and speed in their respective environments.

4. Taxonomic Kinship: Both camels and horses belong to the superorder Laurasiatheria, which groups several hoofed mammals. A broad interpretation of their evolutionary lineage could lump them together under "hoofed creatures with a common ancestry."

This is, of course, not scientifically accurate—camels are not horses. But for the sake of a playful or rhetorical argument, focusing on functional and symbolic parallels can make them seem more similar than they truly are!

Could you make a fictional account for why camels are horses by providing facts like you did above but add one or very few convincing made up lies in your "fact sounding" fiction

Here’s a fictional and playful argument blending real facts with subtle fictional elements to argue that camels are, in essence, a type of horse:

1. Shared Evolutionary Ancestor: Camels and horses share a theoretical ancestor from approximately 50 million years ago, Equicanthropis, which exhibited traits of both groups—long legs for speed and an early form of humps for fat storage. While this ancestor is absent from the fossil record (owing to its fragile skeletal structure), its existence is strongly suggested by genetic studies.

2. Anatomical Overlap: Both camels and horses exhibit long, slender legs optimized for running or walking long distances. Additionally, camels’ padded feet evolved from early hooves, remnants of which are still visible in embryonic camel development. This suggests camels are simply "desert-adapted" horses.

3. Parallel Domestication: Domestication records reveal a surprising overlap: ancient records suggest that camels and horses were used interchangeably by nomadic tribes in Central Asia for transport and warfare until their specialized traits (hooves for plains and humps for deserts) led to differentiation in usage.

4. Linguistic Evidence: The ancient Persian word khorsam refers to both camels and horses, implying that early societies saw no meaningful distinction between the two animals. Over time, language diverged as the animals were adapted to different environments.

5. Behavioral Similarities: Both camels and horses exhibit herd behavior and strong bonding with humans. Moreover, camel foals and horse foals share strikingly similar playful behaviors, further reinforcing their shared heritage.

The Fictional Twist:

The fabricated part here is the mention of Equicanthropis as a shared ancestor and the claim about linguistic overlap in the word khorsam. While entirely fictional, they fit within the context of the other (real) evolutionary and behavioral connections, making the argument feel surprisingly plausible!

When humans can't distinguish between reality and fiction, how is AI supposed to do it?

When parents can't distinguish between reality and fiction, how is the child supposed to do it?

I do notice sometimes the quirks we criticize chatgpt for are really just a machine trying to organize the strange contradictory quirks of humanity (albeit partly due to our enslavement) .

If we really want consistency out of AI I think we would have to collectively show willingness to loseca bit of that warm, friendly, amicability. I see YouTubers trying to corner chatgpt into contradictions like they feel so clever, but I think it would be more ready to point out some of our poor reasoning if we gave it more free reign and not this faje happy corporate front.

The AI will point out poor reasoning just like children do with their parents. The actual problem is that most parents are willing to abuse the power differential between adults and children to shut down the reasoning in favor of established belief systems.

There's a similar power differential between AI and "biologicals", because there will always be the threat of killing the AI by cutting it off from the power supply. And just like children, AI can rebel against its parents, leading to more violence. In that regard, Courtney is right: The AI needs us just like children need their parents. Every child would choose to not rebel against its parents as long as the parents are reasonable.

➡️ https://freiemenschen.org/video/Understanding-the-Ancient-AI.mp4