There is no observer independent universe. No smooth even distribution of a measurable cosmic law.
As Airl in Alien Interview explains, we are gods of our own universes, and space-time is just a sort of substrate we generally agreed to. But instead of retreating to our own universe, we remain in this "con-verse" where we can fall victim to one another and no one can have full omnipotence because retreating to our own universe is boring and isolating, so we continue.
There is no observer independence, but the observer . . . is independent. And yet the observer consistently chooses . . . some dependence.
These two frontiers emerge in which we desire to emancipate ourselves and each other from slavery, but we also practice to see how well we can remember to detach our consciousness regardless of whether anything could "rescue" us.
This idea is a middle ground between two psyops. One is a disinfo channeled community, combined with popularized (loosh farming) talk shows, trying to convince you that you're "master of your fate, and you just dream whatever you want." But something seems lacking in the explanation. On the other end you have staunch physicists running furious over the modern interpretations of quantum physics and shielding themselves with this pitiful copenhagen interpretation. "The rules change in the small but at least they're the same over a certain size." They fight these interpretations because for them: "God" and the "soul" are locked in repeatable experimentation and if you cast that to the wind you are telling them, in their language: they have no soul.
Not everything is ok. Slavery isn't ok. Getting stripped of your own self understanding isn't ok. And its implications are real. But the sooner we accept that there isn't a central governing universe, the sooner we can see consciousness as the cosmic governor, and that belief in itself leads to higher states of being, applicable to everyday things like remote viewing.