Why is it so important to understand what a right is?

Why is it so important to understand that rights come from nature, not other beings?

Because in the world of evil people, they are the ones who make up what rights are in order to create a system of enslavement. The masters have more rights than the slaves. The government has more rights than the citizens. This worldview is literally the operating system of every prison planet. Not knowing how rights work in reality will always create a prison planet, because you will attract evil people who want to have more rights than you so they can own you.

So, knowing how you can define a right without dividing people into masters and slaves would be crucial to get rid of slavery. It's what we need to know to end the prison planet.

So, what are rights?

All you need to understand is that a right is every behavior that does NOT initiate harm to another sentient being.

For example, a predator is initiating harm against another sentient being. Predation is not a right. Because of this, predation will always result in the loss of freedom – predators will either experience a life as an animal in an eat or be eaten world, or they will experience a life where slavery is a crucial part of society and everything is about violence and control.

Predators will never experience a life in freedom.

Humans on this prison planet are predators because we are governed by predators and believe that it's how it has to be. We have the same culture of the ones who are running this prison planet. Our governments create "rights" out of thin air, just like how they create money out of thin air. The natural law consequence is that this planet is a prison planet.

Not understanding rights is the exact reason why we are imprisoned.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72111-understanding-natural-law

I highly recommend the following presentation, in which Mark Passio explains in detail how not knowing rights and accepting immorality is preventing disclosure:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/77606-disclosure-and-morality-are-connected

Ever read the Law of Nations?

The argument operates at the wrong level.
It treats the problem as a misunderstanding of rights, but that only applies within human societies. It does not address the underlying structure.
Even with a perfect definition of rights:
memory would still be wiped
continuity would still be broken
control mechanisms would still operate
So nothing fundamental changes.
This explains domination at the social layer, not the persistence of the system itself.
A structural problem cannot be solved by a moral definition.

@Gewo:

"So nothing fundamental changes."

Is a memory wipe right or wrong?
Is breaking continuity right or wrong?
Are control mechanisms right or wrong?

You obviously believe that they are wrong.

Why?

@Tazz:

"Ever read the Law of Nations?"

➡️ https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758

Quote:

"PRELIMINARIES Idea and general Principles of the Law of Nations.

Nations being composed of men naturally free and independent, and who, before the establishment of civil societies, lived together in the state of nature,—nations or sovereign states are to be considered as so many free persons living together in the state of nature.

It is a settled point with writers on the natural law, that all men inherit from nature a perfect liberty and independence, of which they cannot be deprived without their own consent. In a state, the individual citizens do not enjoy them fully and absolutely, because they have made a partial surrender of them to the sovereign. But the body of the nation, the state, remains absolutely free and independent with respect to all other men, all other nations, as long as it has not voluntarily submitted to them."

The fallacy:

It's the idea that a nation can be sovereign while the people the nation consists of are not.

This is impossible.

This book tries to make an excuse for slavery and frames it as a voluntary decision of the individual. Like, we are okay with being slaves, as long as the nation remains free.

People don't realize that the nation is not free anymore if they voluntarily choose to be slaves.

In other words: Consenting to be a slave is not a right.