According to Courtney, the bad ET do not believe in free will since it spreads chaos throughout the planet.
Ultimately, the good and the bad both come down to free will. When people are allowed to do as they please with others, they can actually do harm to them. If there are traits in people who do harm to others, then is maintaining a control ultimately that bad?
As the human race is not designed in the same way, it is imperative that we understand how good and evil will be addressed?
Courtney's take on things is somewhat different from mine, because clearly there is a freedom of choice on this planet and yes, it may be put in check by religion and the legal system. As a matter of fact, it still exists to some extent

In my experience, I have never really heard a good answer to the question of whether the prison system is beneficial for controlling out of control individuals in our society in some cases. I think we all know that if an alien prison system.traps us here constantly alleged, that I'm not going to have a choice about whether to leave or not. Just trying to understand the reasoning behind the traps. As humans, we have free will, yet we are acting foolishly by killing each other.

If we become aware that the Earth is an alien prison planet, then I want to know how the free will system will handle eight billion people. The people on the side of the bad ET version. I am curious to know what happens to them after this?

Despite this concept being promoted on farsight, there are still a lot of unknowns surrounding it. As far as we are concerned, the so-called good et are not telling us much, other than vague promises of a better future. In this case, we have a problem because nobody is certain what disclosure means if the body is not really ours. After the disclosure is made, do we magically pop out of our bodies?
I would like to know what the good et is saying about this, are we suddenly reborn as a new version of ourselves after disclosure?
Just a few thoughts around free will I had. It's fascinating to ponder how disclosure might impact our sense of self and autonomy. Could it lead to a profound shift in consciousness, or will our core essence remain unchanged?

"When people are allowed to do as they please with others, they can actually do harm to them."

Doing as you please with others is violating freedom, therefore it's not an expression of free will, but unfree will.

"the bad ET do not believe in free will since it spreads chaos throughout the planet."

They do believe in free will, they just don't believe in universal free will. They want it for them, not for everybody, and the reason is simple: Free will for everybody means that you can't do with others as you please. Freedom is not unlimited then (humans know this as the Golden Rule). Evil doesn't want to be subject to universal rules. Evil wants to rule arbitrarily.

"...I want to know how the free will system will handle eight billion people. The people on the side of the bad ET version. I am curious to know what happens to them after this?"

They get a choice. If they choose evil, they will be banned. No need to imprison them.

The practice of free will is the entire point of ISBE existence. The natural progression of ISBE evolution through the universe involves taking on physical forms with greater and broader potential outcomes to a given choice. I believe that consciousnesses naturally take forms throughout the animal kingdom, gaining experience and capability. It seems that a lot of animal forms don’t experience much free will at all, with most behaviors being dictated by instinct. My dad likes to call it a software/firmware mix. A spider is likely 100% firmware. A cat is probably 70%firmware and 30% software, where free will and personality can express.

I’d say your average human is closer to 70% software and 30% firmware; 70% free will decisions and 30% firmware, with the capability to write to a form of firmware as conscious ability turns to unconscious ability as we learn, like driving or playing an instrument.

Humans also have a relatively broad capability to impact the world around them, depending on the circumstances of their birth, society and personal drive. Ultimately a few humans in our society have an outsized control (even if those decisions are heavily influenced by NHI) the outcomes of the lives of billions of humans. The ability to start wars, or even launch nukes could change or destroy the lives of billions. That’s a lot more impact to the consequences free will than a cat!

Once you start to get to the forms of existence that our psychic aware NHI influencers have, the consequences for your actions can impact trillions of souls.

I suspect that NHI societies, given their incredible technological means of observing and interacting with the quantum fields that make up our ISBE entities, must have methods and an interest in gatekeeping which ISBEs enter their societies, since with great power comes great responsibility. And since this is a prison planet, I expect that we have a significant number of ISBEs that long ago graduated to higher forms of existence. We certainly have the criminally insane sent here from the fascist societies that have run this planet for eons, but we also likely have political prisoners who don’t comply with the rule of fascism, as well as many many prisoners of war, forced into lives and existences well beneath their typical capacity.

Thus one could expect that upon “freeing” us from our prison walls and wardens, that the “Good ET’s” must have methods for screening and directing physical and disembodied ISBEs to appropriate existences based on their natural instincts in regards to how their choices impact others. You don’t want to give a toddler the keys and the drivers seat in a Ferrari.

Expect that in the coming months, as the veil slowly fades, we will become increasingly aware of who we were before we were imprisoned here, and what kind and capability of society we are likely to fit in best with in our current state of ISBE development.

"It seems that a lot of animal forms don’t experience much free will at all, with most behaviors being dictated by instinct."

Here's my theory: ISBEs can't destroy energy, as every form of energy is a part of "All-that-is", as described by Courtney in the "AI and Remote Viewing" spotlight. But ISBEs can create energy, in other words: They can create new ISBEs. And they do it like "God" did it in the beginning: They divide themselves. Physical cell division is just a representation of that principle.

I think there are two different ways to create an ISBE:

1. If you invent a lesser lifeform, like an animal, you can put a part of your own energy, your life essence, into that being. This is what they call the "breath of life".

2. If you combine your energy with another ISBE, you get a "mix". We call them children.

With the first way, the energy is just a rudimentary copy, so to speak, as it doesn't contain the consciousness of its creator. It's like a golem. It has the potential of gaining the same consciousness eventually, but it must get there through evolution. For this reason, you need "firmware" so it can survive on its own.

With the second way, when creating a child through sexual reproduction, it's essentially the same, but with the difference that there's no need for firmware (except the stuff that's running your body). The child will become like the parents. The reason why this possibility exists is that creating a mix of two ISBEs unlocks a whole new set of experiences. It's essentially like trading abilities without the need to go through animal evolution again.

The goal of both ways is to create physical bodies as a means of creating different experiences.

"I’d say your average human is closer to 70% software and 30% firmware; 70% free will decisions and 30% firmware,"

You can't divide it like that. It's not set in stone. Here's an example: The spider is running 100% on firmware, which means it has no own consciousness. This means that the experience flows back to the ISBE that created the spider, as the energy of the spider, the breath of life, is a part of its creator. Think of it like a drone that's flying through the air and making pictures. The drone doesn't think about the pictures, it just sends them back to its owner.

Now, how does free will come into play? While the drone experience can be fun, it's getting boring over time. So you have an idea: What if I was inside the drone? How would it be like if I was the spider? But there's a problem: The spider can't hold your whole consciousness, its little brain can't handle all the information. If you become the spider under that condition, you would be trapped, or at least you would be dependent on other ISBEs to get out again. Why? Because it's a free will decision to not be the spider anymore, and inside the spider, you don't have that capability anymore.

So, the first thing you do is you create a firmware that's capable of evolution. This means that your consciousness will become aware of free will eventually, so you won't be trapped. At least not forever. That's physical evolution explained in a nutshell.

This means that when a being reaches the point of awareness of free will, it becomes what is called "sapient". Sapience essentially is self-awareness, the "I think therefore I am" stuff. It's the point where you get aware that you can decide for yourself to not eat the bad fruit. The point where you can go against your firmware by choice.

That's what's dividing the animal kingdom and the sapient kingdom.

"with the capability to write to a form of firmware as conscious ability turns to unconscious ability as we learn, like driving or playing an instrument."

Yes, you regain your ability to write the firmware. But this time, from within the experience, not from the outside. That state of being is called "individuality". An individual is a sapient being that's capable of choosing its own destiny.

"That’s a lot more impact to the consequences free will than a cat!"

Of course. That's the whole point.

"Thus one could expect that upon “freeing” us from our prison walls and wardens, that the “Good ET’s” must have methods for screening and directing physical and disembodied ISBEs to appropriate existences based on their natural instincts in regards to how their choices impact others."

Humanity will split. No, that's not correct. It's already divided. Humanity will become aware of how divided it actually is. Some will join the bad ETs, some will join the good ETs, some will go elsewhere and create new societies, some will go on committing their crimes wherever they are, and some will try to make humanity great again, as human civilization is its own experience.

And the latter is the reason why advanced ISBEs are interested in humanity at all. Humanity is a new civilization. It's a whole new game, with new bodies and new experiences.

Re: «"It seems that a lot of animal forms don’t experience much free will at all, with most behaviors being dictated by instinct."»
This has more to do with it physical-structure and its lack of the existence of being able to use something called a Thumb; without a «thumb» most creatures aren't going to have access to the «Tools» (and Toys) that are otherwise «accessible» to the «human» species. Reading a book? How does a dog or cat turn the page without slobbering all over or even chewing it up into being tattered? Then there are carrier-pigeons! They don't attach lettres to their legs;

Neither do they remove lettres that a human affixes to its leg in order for it to deliver a lettre to a specific-designated human; whilst birds of a feather do tend to flock together (hive-mind, group-think, schools-of-fish, etc.), pets can and do have their own «temperaments» and personality traits, indicating that they still possess «unique-expression» capabilities. Humans are simply more capable of doing more things due to having access to more tools than other physical-beings, but, unfortunately, most humans are kept from truly reaching their full-potential.

Documentaries about «Human-Stupidity» and «The Dumbing Down of America» (and ultimately the rest of the whole entire world) galore, just as some famous people have said in the past, involving Mark Twain, Albert Einstein, George Carlin, they are:
«Two things are infinite: The universe and human-stupidity; and I'm not so sure about the latter.» (Implying that he was absolutely certain about the former)
«Never under-estimate the power of stupid people... in large numbers...!» O_O

All of this is vague when there is virtually no metric for what is "free will" and what is "disclosure" and even what is "freedom" from the prison.

I would be happy to try and build some of the defining characteristics for these terms but it would be up to Farsight to acknowledge those definitions. What I do feel convinced of is we don't have freedom by most definition and if we don't have freedom then it's hard to explain how exactly we're operating on free will of any kind

According to Mark Passio there are definite UNIERSAL laws for free will and they are based on morality. (He explains the term). You are free to do as you please as long as it doesn't harm anyone. I will find his link and place it here. It's really worth listening to.
Update - FOUND IT. http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/videos

We have free will, but we are hopelessly programmed by the Negs. Manual, you make some very good points.

As I have mentioned elsewhere, I do not agree with CB regarding Earth being made as a prision. Instead it became one once we were conquered by the negs. They won that war. So essentially now the planet is a negative place, placed within a frequency fence and no one gets out...(well up to now as we are figuring out the trap). Our free will has been over ruled, and the memories of our power erased. We have no free will here because we have lost our power.

I agree with what Tazz said above, we have no freedom here, ...so basically we have free will that is useless to us since we have no freedom/power to enact it. Or haven't for past eons.

This is what any intervention we get needs to help us change. Disclosure will perhaps be the sudden realization en mass of how this whole illusion on Earth is set up, and run (by the negs). We thus get a glipse of truth, and from there we will each need to make a decision regarding where we align. Will we choose to have power over others, and be powered over by othes, OR will we align ourselves with the Universal Laws of Creation (the universal laws of God that are immutable) as explained by Passio. (I am not one iota religious, but resonate with what Passio says). If we are all moral, we need no laws, and are free to do what we wish, as long as it harms no one else.

That's the New Earth that would become quite a paradise. I'm for creating that, and giving the negs the boot. Some say they couldn't stay here anyway because the frequency would be too high for them to survive. They keep this planet in chaos and suffering for that very reason.