I am a criticizer of the Good Ets. And the Sherriff in these here parts.
I admit I am critical of Aliens because of the massive power differential with their ability to manipulate brain waves, and their power in general; I.E super saucers etc. And this ability to manipulate humans with Alien super minds has been remote viewed as happening in our past, and actually as we speak. As with Elon, and Putin, and the Pope; not Jack and Barney down at the local pub.
But the ability of every Alien to mind to control us at will, means the Alien will for a long time, have the ability to manipulate our emotions and reality. And they can FIX that emotion as though they had turned on a light switch, not just manipulate our emotions while we are in their presence. Set it or fix it for all time. That is a good reason NOT to contact the aliens in their flying saucers as they suggest.
I'll just listen to their words and examine their actions thank you very much. That will be sufficient to get a read on them.
I criticize mostly their actions and words of explanation.
Statements such as - "Wars and conflict must be started in many places to bring change and peace." This one would trigger a panicked stampede to any solution they suggest to us. As anything other than nuclear war would be better. And of course once we accept their solution, then they can be the rulers. Talk about a coerced freewill "choice" !! Which is also something we learned is the norm in the Universe. Is this a good idea ?
"No one dies" they said. But with nuclear weapons being readied they must be talking about the ISBEs inside of us. Is that a great comfort then ? Lots of regular flesh and blood humans will die. What kind of reassurance is that and logic is that ?
"We will fly our orbs, and then our large saucers, as they cannot be shot down" - and half of that happened - Seemed like a good plan, but then Saucers now could be shot down ? Probably.
Seems to point to a limited understanding of their opposition. Our future Alien leaders don't seem to have a firm grasp on their opposition, and they just got started. First move on the chess board and already they need to rework their plan !
"We cannot show ourselves to you because we would be arrested". Arrested by humans ? Hardly possible ! By the galactic Police force, for fraudulent behavior maybe ?
Then we have Reptilians and Greys abducting thousands (maybe millions) of humans and Farsight, remote viewed Ants, and Reptilians.
Yet we hear that at these meetings are Reptilians, Ants, and a Grey (Harvey was it ?). And we have seen remote viewings, of Ants and Reptilians saying Humans are a cancer in the Universe, and therefor the Humans must be wiped out. Seems a titch worrying to me, to be fraternizing with Ants and Reptilians then.
And remember Lyn Buchanan (one of the most famous and talented Remote viewers in the business) said hybrids are coming in with 90% kill off of humans. And the Hybrids will be Greys, Reptilians, Ants, and Tall Whites !! AND THATS PRETTY WELL WHO THE GOOD ETS ARE !!
"&*%$###*##!!!!!" Hear my exasperation !!!
AND GREYS MUST BE SAVED, and yet Greys are abducting us right left and center. Oh but they are the victims of the Reptilians. Yet Harvey is saying "save our race from the Reptilians!". And yet a Reptilian was in the group in the early meetings (which we are not permitted to see) . So I'm getting confused here. WHO IS RESCUING WHO HERE ?
But the Good Ets are "good" and yet they seem to be the same suspects we already have ruling the planet now. And so, when we are told "we cannot show ourselves because some Coppers might cuff us"- seems pretty lame.
These guys aren't straight shooters in my books. I am listening and not liking what I'm hearing. They have more strikes against themselves than positives, and its coming from what they say, and their story that doesn't quite add up.
If it isn't going well -- then its our fault. We are not linking up to their minds. HOW ADVANCED DO WE THINK-- THEY ARE ? Because they sound like some drunk coming home to wifey-poo and telling her, "its all her fault he has to drink so much." And I say, "how dumb do they think we are ?" Pretty dumb I guess.
And now you heard the opinion from the other side of the room, and at least I'm consistent ! My point is, their "good and fine words, and expressed sentiments" are not adding up with their explanations and actions, and observed evidence.
So no I cant sit by remaining "neutral" as to what I'm seeing and hearing. I see them in a negative light; a dim light of their own words and actions.
You are sitting in a free speech zone. And perhaps I'm wrong. Well its still good to hear the other side. Show me where I'm wrong, and make your point and explanations more strongly. Show the evidence and consistency needed to make your case. And make some stronger proofs than just saying "don't be skeptical." I'm skeptical with good reason, I believe. Make your case and Ill believe otherwise.