I have observed a general surge in a sense of distrust, fear, and suspicion in the community that has gathered around the works of Farsight, and indeed also among the viewers themselves. I would like to address this sentiment, and also offer some things I feel might help guide those who are concerned.

Many question the true nature and aims of the friends of farsight who allegedly guide and protect them. This is fine, and I feel critical thinking should be encouraged, but there is a rift of a difference between just doing that, and actually saying farsight is being lied to and misled and used by a hostile and harmful force.

The point of farsight is to spark a drive in the masses to reclaim their power. We have power that is untapped and untold. If you have any doubt of farsight, then go confirm the information for yourself. If you dont trust who they're communicating and working with, then go view them yourself.

Their data is not meant to be taken as some kind of neo-axiom. They're not making projects to preach the truth to the masses, they're making them as an example. The underlying narrative they have strung together is meant to act as a contrast-agent or a counter-agent to the hypnotic white noise of the overwhelming human narrative imposed on us. It's supposed to be a spark, a catalyst, a "kick in the ass", to inspire you to go learn RV yourself and see if its actually all true. Dont make the mistake of thinking your frustration with anything they say or do is founded in any legitimacy if you haven't tried to replicate and/or check what they do by RV'ing for yourself. Until this is done, the only legitimate and honest stance possible on farsight is a neutral stance. Not an affirmative or a negative stance. Not until you can take those stances from your own observation. That is true and honest scientific discourse.

To this I offer to you that first hand knowledge is always better than misguided notions rooted in nothing.

Basically everything Ro said. And to top it.

It wasn't long ago that the only way we could question reality was to audit the evidence. To repeat experiments, to examine whether other agencies have found similar or dissimilar results, to hear discourse between those absolutely loyal to a theory vs its most aggressive doubters. This is progress, provided that there isn't some insidious pretence of "fair journalism" or "balanced investigation" which if you eliminate the assumption that a corporation can lie as bad as person can, then you fail at seeing things rationally.

But farsight is proposing a slightly different paradigm. Not a very drastic shift. That remote viewing data can compliment evidence, and the same debates are still necessary.

I see some posts about doubts such that Farsight is not really for the benefit of "us" (whomever you want to include in that word) or is misled or lieing, whatever. But I would like to see those doubters take the next step.

I want to see the "test Farsight" remote viewing group. The group that says "we don't believe them, so we're going to do our own RV investigations and see if we get any of the same results." Unfortunately, we're nowhere near that level because there isn't even really a "RV like Farsight" group. There's occasional puffs of tasks, and I unfortunately have barely dipped into the waters of this field . . . but I promise that's going to change with me pretty soon.

To summarize: Please, embrace that skepticism. But embrace it actively, not passively. That's really the difference between healthy skepticism and cheap pseudoskepticism. Giving armchair criticism, hoping that sounds smart *vs* trying to prove them wrong, and aggressively attempting to act on doubt by either trying to show how "stupid" the idea of RV is with heavy experimentation or trying to suggest that "they're the bad guys" by showing RV sessions and evidence that point to foul play.

I am a criticizer of the Good Ets. And the Sherriff in these here parts.

I admit I am critical of Aliens because of the massive power differential with their ability to manipulate brain waves, and their power in general; I.E super saucers etc. And this ability to manipulate humans with Alien super minds has been remote viewed as happening in our past, and actually as we speak. As with Elon, and Putin, and the Pope; not Jack and Barney down at the local pub.

But the ability of every Alien to mind to control us at will, means the Alien will for a long time, have the ability to manipulate our emotions and reality. And they can FIX that emotion as though they had turned on a light switch, not just manipulate our emotions while we are in their presence. Set it or fix it for all time. That is a good reason NOT to contact the aliens in their flying saucers as they suggest.

I'll just listen to their words and examine their actions thank you very much. That will be sufficient to get a read on them.

I criticize mostly their actions and words of explanation.

Statements such as - "Wars and conflict must be started in many places to bring change and peace." This one would trigger a panicked stampede to any solution they suggest to us. As anything other than nuclear war would be better. And of course once we accept their solution, then they can be the rulers. Talk about a coerced freewill "choice" !! Which is also something we learned is the norm in the Universe. Is this a good idea ?

"No one dies" they said. But with nuclear weapons being readied they must be talking about the ISBEs inside of us. Is that a great comfort then ? Lots of regular flesh and blood humans will die. What kind of reassurance is that and logic is that ?

"We will fly our orbs, and then our large saucers, as they cannot be shot down" - and half of that happened - Seemed like a good plan, but then Saucers now could be shot down ? Probably.

Seems to point to a limited understanding of their opposition. Our future Alien leaders don't seem to have a firm grasp on their opposition, and they just got started. First move on the chess board and already they need to rework their plan !

"We cannot show ourselves to you because we would be arrested". Arrested by humans ? Hardly possible ! By the galactic Police force, for fraudulent behavior maybe ?

Then we have Reptilians and Greys abducting thousands (maybe millions) of humans and Farsight, remote viewed Ants, and Reptilians.

Yet we hear that at these meetings are Reptilians, Ants, and a Grey (Harvey was it ?). And we have seen remote viewings, of Ants and Reptilians saying Humans are a cancer in the Universe, and therefor the Humans must be wiped out. Seems a titch worrying to me, to be fraternizing with Ants and Reptilians then.

And remember Lyn Buchanan (one of the most famous and talented Remote viewers in the business) said hybrids are coming in with 90% kill off of humans. And the Hybrids will be Greys, Reptilians, Ants, and Tall Whites !! AND THATS PRETTY WELL WHO THE GOOD ETS ARE !!
"&*%$###*##!!!!!" Hear my exasperation !!!

AND GREYS MUST BE SAVED, and yet Greys are abducting us right left and center. Oh but they are the victims of the Reptilians. Yet Harvey is saying "save our race from the Reptilians!". And yet a Reptilian was in the group in the early meetings (which we are not permitted to see) . So I'm getting confused here. WHO IS RESCUING WHO HERE ?

But the Good Ets are "good" and yet they seem to be the same suspects we already have ruling the planet now. And so, when we are told "we cannot show ourselves because some Coppers might cuff us"- seems pretty lame.

These guys aren't straight shooters in my books. I am listening and not liking what I'm hearing. They have more strikes against themselves than positives, and its coming from what they say, and their story that doesn't quite add up.

If it isn't going well -- then its our fault. We are not linking up to their minds. HOW ADVANCED DO WE THINK-- THEY ARE ? Because they sound like some drunk coming home to wifey-poo and telling her, "its all her fault he has to drink so much." And I say, "how dumb do they think we are ?" Pretty dumb I guess.

And now you heard the opinion from the other side of the room, and at least I'm consistent ! My point is, their "good and fine words, and expressed sentiments" are not adding up with their explanations and actions, and observed evidence.

So no I cant sit by remaining "neutral" as to what I'm seeing and hearing. I see them in a negative light; a dim light of their own words and actions.

You are sitting in a free speech zone. And perhaps I'm wrong. Well its still good to hear the other side. Show me where I'm wrong, and make your point and explanations more strongly. Show the evidence and consistency needed to make your case. And make some stronger proofs than just saying "don't be skeptical." I'm skeptical with good reason, I believe. Make your case and Ill believe otherwise.

I'll add, this is just a reiteration of a question I have standing with Courtney.

If the matter is largely that psycho-history is very relevant to endgame- that makes some sense. You can't win by physical tech alone because that matter is basically a standoff. The question becomes who has the psychological advantage (with both human neurology and its ISBE operator psychology)

But when he says "free will" species I need to understand what is their position on not only free will but contracts, tacit consent, and duress. If you're not going to get technical about physical machinery, then at least get technical about "free will" mechanics. For example, some people believe that a contract requires at least 8 elements to be valid, some say it needs 10. These are not trivial issues especially if the decisions of your entire civilization are based on whether someone has agreed by their own free will. If you can't expand on that philosophy in detail, why would you insist and expect that others would find it rational on face value.

I totally agree the best answer is to "do better" and interpret Farsight as a spark that leads to starting other RV projects.

Courtney diserves 5 starts for making RV projects "fun to watch."

Neverthless I also think it is important to point out the scientific flaws here and there, the political interpretations, the possible contradictions and the serious cognitive limits at play.

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/70404-can-one-trust-a-superior-entity

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/70274-is-roswell-airl-the-main-source-for-farsight

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71639-project-blue-beam

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72056-aziz-now

Most if not all of these «questions» have actually already been answered in the past (would be easier to «find» them if there were some sort of FAQ set-up). The «situation» here on earth is one that can easily result in «humans» feeling various senses of hopelessness, despair, like we're in a «desperate-situation» but, that is just part of the «human» experience; the «trick» is to over-come this...

Remember how there are numerous «movies» where the «theme» is about trying to PREVENT there from being ANY «hope» existing amongst the masses ? (Hunger-Games, the thousands of Ants versus their Oppressors, which-ever movies those were, etc.) Dr. Courtney Brown's «reach-out» into the «galactic-forces» (telepathically) was precisely because he's witnessed what's going on on earth.

Even I am in a similar situation/dilemna; I'm the Voluntary Successor to the very returned (re-incarnated) Messiah (Imam Al-Mahdi) himself, but, that doesn't mean that I want to be «worshipped» or anything (I don't), but, I still need to present myself as some sort of «Leader» in that sense and try to set forth good examples if I can; all people like he and I can do is to simply «try our best» really.

Do I want people to «believe» what I say? Well, anybody who believes that they have «The Truth» would certainly want people and «the masses» to know said Truths, but, much of these «Truths» are not only often highly suppressed, censored, distorted, etc., but, simultaneously, even when some bit of «Truth» _does_ get out, people are going to continue to be «skeptical» due to «programming.»

I will continue with more «clarifications» later but for now just know that we're both mere «humans» right now and we will face the same kinds of challenges in trying to «clarify» various kinds of «truths» even if we do possess pre-earth-life-memories from before we were even born as «humans...»

Until that time comes, of one seeking and gather enough data (if even possible) of what's going on, im still on my part, still having doubts about the agenda of these free will. I even question this last et board meeting whic is something i don't usually do, all of this narrative from the et part bringing forth A.I. bringing forth the "blending with isbes/human, all that for me screams Bashar agenda, full on!! "The hybrids are already here amongst us", "there will a blending of us with them (hence Wilda which is a hybrid gray/human from 300 years from now that Darryl Anka also channels)", "the first hybrids to come before the other ones", "we need to integrate with A.I." just like bashar said it, the hybridization / blending with it in order to (according with Bashar) to become like hybrid grays in the near future, something that this et boar meeting was mentioned about the changes of the human body",... "hey there is no other way you'll have to integrate yourself with A.I. you gotta put that chip in you or else, you probably get transferred to another location", so much for free will ha?!
Although for the most part of the premises that the ET's talked about the acceptance of the collective with one another, with their differences and so on, that im on board but this time i even question if with all this war going on if it was really the free will that were on that board meeting, im used to military communication, of course not on an et level, i live with it 6 days a week for several years now, still i ask the question!
In terms of Farsight agenda it doesn't change nothing for me since i've always been here even and regardless of some data and approach, Farsight mission apart from the ET's was always about truth through RV and disclosure and help with the development of humans thought psychic capabilities, its the ET part that i don't now sh.. and have even more questions about it..
Something fishy and im starting to think there is no other way from it and therefore we are stuck/trap with the alternative!
And yes like i mention, one way, or probably the only way, is to develop our capabilities, to unblock and enhance it which is probably one way to free from the traps of the grid.

On a scale of 0-10, with 10 being complete trust and 0 being complete doubt, I'd probably put myself at an 8+ with what I think Farsight is doing right now. I'm still getting more data myself, but it seems like they are on track. Predicting the future is hard so there's some leeway if they don't get everything absolutely correct.