Not only is Perplexity A.I. (at least the Desk-Top Version when logged in via an Account) able to access the contents of the Far-Sight web-page directly when the link is provided (other than the actual internal-contents of the .pdf files themselves), I think it has great promise to be able to achieve the Human-A.I. Collaboration-Objectives. Claude still struggles with direct-access to the Far-Sight web-site direct-links so I'll need to adjust the protocol more which I'll explain in another thread. Anyway...
[My Query] Can I expect Perplexity A.I. to be less prone to all of that political-censorship and ideological-dogma in comparison to all of those other aforementioned A.I. systems ?
[Response from Perplexity A.I.] Perplexity AI appears to be **less prone to political censorship and ideological dogma** compared to many other AI systems, as evidenced by its recent release of the **R1 1776 model**, which specifically aims to counter censorship. Here’s what sets Perplexity AI apart:
### **Key Features of Perplexity AI's Approach**
1. **Anti-Censorship Initiative:**
- The R1 1776 model was developed to eliminate censorship aligned with restrictive geopolitical entities, such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)[1][2][3].
- It was trained on a dataset of 40,000 multilingual prompts across 300 censored topics, enabling it to handle sensitive issues like Taiwan's independence without bias[1][3].
2. **Open-Source Transparency:**
- Perplexity AI has made R1 1776 open-source, allowing developers worldwide to explore, scrutinize, and improve the model[3][5].
- This transparency fosters collaboration and accountability in the AI community, ensuring that the model evolves while maintaining its uncensored nature.
3. **Technical Methodology:**
- The integration of NVIDIA’s NeMo 2.0 framework ensures that removing censorship does not compromise reasoning capabilities or performance benchmarks[1][3].
- The multilingual censorship classifier allows the model to operate effectively across languages without reverting to restrictive filters[5].
4. **Ethical Positioning:**
- Perplexity AI has explicitly positioned itself as an advocate for free expression and open access to information, challenging norms around censorship in AI systems[2][6].
- This move contrasts with other models that prioritize compliance with local laws or corporate policies over unrestricted informational access.
5. **Global Implications:**
- By removing censorship from DeepSeek-R1, Perplexity AI raises important questions about who defines AI boundaries and how global access to information can be balanced with local regulations[6].
---
### **Comparison with Other AI Systems**
| Feature | Perplexity AI (R1 1776) | ChatGPT/Claude/DeepSeek |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|
| **Censorship Resistance** | High (anti-censorship focus) | Moderate to High (varies by topic/language) |
| **Transparency** | Open-source | Proprietary |
| **Multilingual Adaptability** | Strong (multilingual classifier) | Varies; some languages trigger restrictions |
| **Ethical Stance** | Advocates free expression | Balances compliance and openness |
| **Performance Post-Censorship Removal** | Retains reasoning abilities | N/A (no uncensored versions available) |
---
### **Conclusion**
Perplexity AI’s R1 1776 demonstrates a proactive stance against censorship, making it a promising choice for users seeking open and uncensored access to information. While no system is entirely free from bias, Perplexity AI’s commitment to transparency and collaboration sets it apart in the current landscape.
If freedom of expression and reduced political filtering are priorities for your use case, Perplexity AI appears well-suited to meet those needs.
Citations:
[1] https://opentools.ai/news/perplexity-ai-unleashes-r1-1776-the-anti-censorship-language-model
[2] https://opentools.ai/news/perplexity-ais-bold-move-launches-1776-to-challenge-censorship
[3] https://hyperight.com/perplexity-r1-1776-matches-deepseek-r1-performance-without-the-censorship/
[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/perplexity_ai/comments/166geu0/does_perplexity_ai_have_fewer_content/
[5] https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/blog/open-sourcing-r1-1776
[6] https://www.unite.ai/perplexity-ai-uncensors-deepseek-r1-who-decides-ais-boundaries/
[7] https://lifehacker.com/tech/uncensored-deepseek-through-perplexity-ai
---
Answer from Perplexity: pplx.ai/share
