Here are my comments about the recent video, "The fate of Men".

As someone who has gone through an Academic Course recently in a Western Country, I totally agree with the specific claims about the 'Dating System' imploding.

I personally went through my teenage years in the 1970s and 1980's and the 'enforcement' of division of Gender then were much less. If I saw or observed anything, it would be best to say "I saw nothing", because retrospective Law Enforcement could have a field day with some of male friends that were tuned into the "free love" ideology from the 1960s that flowed over in the Music.

To put it simply and accurately, Institutions have "Codes of Conduct" whereby female students can report out of class activity by Males to Teachers and there is follow up by the Institution.

I would like to say that in my particular Business Class, there were about 20 reproduction age females and about 6 males. One male was Transgender, three males were Gay, one was me an Older Retirement Age male, and the last Dating age male not actively Dating at all. A combination of Financial Status and not meeting the "Requirements" of any females.

The biggest problem wasn't really any of this, but the total lack of interest by the Females in the class in any current Reproduction Direction. That I could detect anyway.

It was a sense of the idea that their reproductive equipment belonged to them to hide, rather than acknowledging any sort of "Community Ownership" of that 'equipment'. Something that exists for the preservation of Humanity.

So as for the idea of a 20-year period being enough to collapse Humanity? Definitely yes.

From the Dark side? Maybe yes, maybe no. There are a lot of issues in that discussion. To do it justice would involve delving into History, remote-viewing or contacting women of the past and taking their views into consideration. So I don't want to summarise those experiences without their exact words.

Whereto?

Probably the merge of the Greys and Humans to form an updated version of Humanity? as Courtney has pointed out.

It's a hard pill to swallow, but in Western Countries, that is how to me it looks like at the moment.

Similar rules exist in Workplaces.

@David Lyon:

"The biggest problem wasn't really any of this, but the total lack of interest by the Females in the class in any current Reproduction Direction."

They simply taught women to flip the order of when to reproduce.

In the past, it was children and family first, because reproductive capabilities work best when you are young. Let's say a woman has 3 children, one every 2 years, and the first is born when she is 23. The third child would be born when she is 27. The children would be grown up when she is 45. With an average life expectancy of 80 years, she would still have 35 years to do something else, and she could even begin earlier, because you don't have to wait until every child is 18.

But modern culture tells women to approach the career outside of the family first, which leads to modern women wanting to start a family when they are 45 years old. This doesn't work at all, not just because of biology, but because men still want young women to start a family, and for good reasons.

The "career first" approach makes modern women miserable and hate men because most men don't want to date a 45 year old women. Men in return start to hate the women who hate them for wanting to have kids early.

"It was a sense of the idea that their reproductive equipment belonged to them to hide, rather than acknowledging any sort of "Community Ownership" of that 'equipment'."

This is total nonsense. Their reproductive organs belong to them, because every being owns its body. There is no "community ownership" of bodies, unless you're living in an insectoid hive mind with no self-ownership.

If a woman doesn't want to reproduce, she has the right to choose that path.

"preservation of Humanity"

The preservation argument doesn't work. There are still enough women that want to reproduce in order to preserve humanity. If you want every member of a society to reproduce, not allowing a free will decision, it's not because of preservation of that society. It's because you want to expand aggressively.

"Probably the merge of the Greys and Humans to form an updated version of Humanity?"

Why are people always black or white? Why not let the ISBEs who want to make hybrids create a hybrid society, and the ISBEs who don't want to change their bodies stay human? Both can co-exist. That's exactly what the free will ETs are all about. It doesn't have to be either-or.

List of things that would become irrelevant to ethical sensitivity if reincarnation became an understood fact-

*Gender. You can be born anything. You always had choice.

*Ethnicity: You can be born anything. You always had choice.

*Cybernetics: You can be born anything. You always had choice.

*Genetic engineering: You can be born anything. You always had choice.

With that said, until that happens, these issues will be a bed of weeds rather than a garden. And life will also suck.