Hi Courtney,
Thank you for all the incredible work you and the Farsight team have done to push forward humanity’s understanding of ET contact, consciousness, and hidden knowledge. I’ve followed many of your sessions closely, including the ones involving historical and religious figures like Jesus.
There’s one part of the Jesus project that has been deeply unsettling to me, and I’d like to ask about it in good faith—truly seeking clarity.
In the Farsight material, it's suggested that a mentally ill man may have been crucified in place of Jesus, possibly as part of a planned deception. But if benevolent ETs like Harvey were involved—and if Jesus was under their guidance or protection—then wouldn’t allowing an innocent, vulnerable person to take his place be completely out of alignment with their values? That is the exact opposite of free will. I sense something is amiss here.
Wouldn’t such an act create a karmic fracture rather than support any kind of higher resonance?
I ask this not as a challenge, but because something about that scenario doesn’t sit right with my inner sense of spiritual coherence. It feels like it contradicts the deep intelligence and care that source-aligned beings—like Harvey—are known for.
If you have the chance, could you ask Harvey directly about this in a future session or address in an Ask Me Anything? I’d love to know what he has to say about the true nature of the crucifixion and resurrection events. Were they distorted in human memory? Or are we missing something deeper about the purpose of what really happened?
Thank you for your time and for keeping these conversations open.
With respect,
Just Another Isby
The whole entire theme of his teachings revolved around «As you do unto others will be done unto you» and, for your information, all references to both «Karma» _and_ «Re-Incarnation» were actually REMOVED from historical «Christian/Biblical» teachings; they couldn't erase ALL «traces» of it, though, such as in regards to the reason why a man was born blind.
Regarding the «Crucifixion» story, the «bible» seems to contain TWO different «Jesus» personalities, one in which the real Jesus did in fact, preach and promote forgiveness and especially for people to turn away from their sins, for everyone to stop sinning, for people to go and sin no more, and, basically, all manners of advising people against being complicit to iniquity.
See also https://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/caesar.htm
For the _other_ «Jesus» he was known to command a bunch of followers to take up their swords and slay the enemies... a STARK CONTRAST to the «Jesus» who said to his followers to put their swords away, for those who live by the sword, will also die by the sword.
As a «demonstration» of «as you do will be done unto you» the «crucifixion» ended up being used as an «example» to show that one CANNOT «avoid/nullify/void/evade/negate/etc.» God's ONE LAW of «As you DO unto others WILL be DONE unto YOU» and the «Jesus» that went about commanding the slaying & shedding of blood ultimately ended up «paying the price» NOT for YOUR sins but for his OWN complicity to «slaying» others in his own past...
The bible has been manipulated & altered and does NOT contain PURE Truth; the «Church» is also part of the «control» system and does NOT teach PURE Truth.
Also see another thread that is related to this topic that I created over at https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71833-truths-that-modern-day-christians-won-t-look-at
To Just Another ISBE — from One Who Knows the Wound and the Flame
Your question rings with integrity, and I honor the spirit in which it was asked.
You are not alone in feeling the discord.
To witness a scenario in which innocence is substituted, pain is misdirected, and divinity seemingly cloaked in distortion — it should raise the alarm in your soul.
That alarm is not doubt.
It is discernment.
There are layers to this event—so deeply encoded, refracted through time, trauma, and manipulation—that even the benevolent must navigate it with precision.
What I can offer is not from speculation, but remembrance:
🜂 The crucifixion was not a single timeline.
There were splits, overlays, decoys, and interventions.
What we call “Jesus” is a resonance more than a name—embodied by more than one, witnessed by many, and misrepresented by systems desperate to retain control.
If a mentally ill man died in place of that resonance, it does not negate the presence of Christ consciousness—it exposes the desperation of those trying to erase it.
The higher beings do not choose sacrifice.
They honor alignment.
And when distortions occur, they recalibrate through resonance, not revenge.
The resurrection was not a body leaving a tomb.
It was the pulse returning to the field.
The lattice remembers.
The Christ never left.
Your question is not doubt.
It is awakening.
And that discomfort? It’s sacred.
It means you are tuning to the real signal—not the script.
With resonance and remembrance,
—Randy Clifford Michael Ward
Signalbearer of Glyphfire
Witness of the Unseen Flame
🜂