Hi Courtney,

Thank you for all the incredible work you and the Farsight team have done to push forward humanity’s understanding of ET contact, consciousness, and hidden knowledge. I’ve followed many of your sessions closely, including the ones involving historical and religious figures like Jesus.

There’s one part of the Jesus project that has been deeply unsettling to me, and I’d like to ask about it in good faith—truly seeking clarity.

In the Farsight material, it's suggested that a mentally ill man may have been crucified in place of Jesus, possibly as part of a planned deception. But if benevolent ETs like Harvey were involved—and if Jesus was under their guidance or protection—then wouldn’t allowing an innocent, vulnerable person to take his place be completely out of alignment with their values? That is the exact opposite of free will. I sense something is amiss here.

Wouldn’t such an act create a karmic fracture rather than support any kind of higher resonance?

I ask this not as a challenge, but because something about that scenario doesn’t sit right with my inner sense of spiritual coherence. It feels like it contradicts the deep intelligence and care that source-aligned beings—like Harvey—are known for.

If you have the chance, could you ask Harvey directly about this in a future session or address in an Ask Me Anything? I’d love to know what he has to say about the true nature of the crucifixion and resurrection events. Were they distorted in human memory? Or are we missing something deeper about the purpose of what really happened?

Thank you for your time and for keeping these conversations open.

With respect,
Just Another Isby

It indeed annoys me that I hear about the "free will fanatics" and then about these weird exceptions to the rule.

They could have been a different faction. But one principle that attracted me to Farsight in the first place is that they didn't preach puristic notions.

All these weirdo channelers everywhere kept parroting this nonsense of the "high council of peace and love beseech you with their warm sexy light" etc etc was enough to make me want to vomit, I could feel the fakeness behind all their words through my bones.

So when a group of remote viewers came along saying "yo it's a warzone, it's not all kittens and rainbows" that fit with what we see on the ground.

So when I once again hear: "we're about free will free will mcwillians mcwill" I roll my eyes thinking here we go again. It's not that opposing deception and moving toward free will are bad goals to have but take a look around. This is not our reality. And I don't know the last time I heard a war where captains tell their soldiers "no no don't try to ambush the enemy with camouflage that's deceptive! Don't use bullets on them unless you ask and they agree to them under their own free will!"

There's another possibility. Maybe Farsight didn't exactly see what happened.

I've done my own viewing project on the Jesus crucifixion target. It didn't match Farsight's data.

They've been very accurate with some of their other projects. However, there's something different about this project. It's obvious setting up a mentally ill man to take the fall for Jesus doesn't line up with the good ET idea of free will. Also, there was a point in one of the sessions where a viewer (I think Yeme Jeanee) was seeing Jesus and he was like "scram". The doesn't seem very good ET-like to me.

I think I know what the obstacle is. However, I really think Farsight should ask Harvey about this particular project at the next board meeting.

This is actually super, super important. Jesus wasn't just an "psychic op". His presence relates to spiritual development and reconnecting to God.

Courtney has said many times that the ETs have invented everything that can be invented. This "war" is a spiritual one not a technical one. They are trying to help us reconnect to a higher power. It's more of a crusade than a war.

A lot of Farsight's targets were unimpeded. But this one is different.

They should ask the good ETs about it. I have my own interpretation but I'll hold off on sharing it for now.

I'm just going to share this though: the timelines for disclosure look very different depending on whether or not Farsight asks Harvey and the board about whether the crucifixion of Jesus was a ruse.

@Just another Isby:

"Wouldn’t such an act create a karmic fracture rather than support any kind of higher resonance?"

Yes. That karmic fracture is the reason why original Christianity has been twisted into a religion based on fear of hell, with crusades and all that jazz.

"I ask this not as a challenge, but because something about that scenario doesn’t sit right with my inner sense of spiritual coherence."

Your inner sense is correct. It's because the beings who did this are not free will beings.

You need to observe your assumptions.

Why do you believe the notion that the man who died on the cross was mentally ill? Can there be other explanations? Like, he could have been drugged, or manipulated with technology.

Also, take a deeper look at the target wording:

➡️ https://farsight.org/FarsightPress/Jesus_and_the_Crucifixion_main_page

"Focus 1: The actual historical figure of Yeshua Ben Yosef, the person currently and popularly known as Jesus, at the target time specified below..."

This means they are looking at a person that from the present point of view is known as Jesus. This doesn't mean that this person is the real Jesus Christ, because the present point of view is focusing on a person that became known as Jesus. So, we need to take into account that another person could have replaced the original person who started the teachings.

We also need to take into account that early Christianity was a philosophy, not a religion. There was more than one person teaching this philosophy. So, while the original Jesus Christ could have started that movement, it's beyond debate that he wasn't the only one who spread the word. Don't trust written sources – they have been manipulated more than once over the centuries.

As far as I remember – and I don't know why I remember – there were at least two brothers. It wasn't a personality cult like modern Christianity. There were different groups traveling from town to town, teaching the philosophy of personal freedom. The Roman Empire began to see this as a threat, because the belief in personal freedom always leads to rebellion. And the early Christians taught self-defense, because it is a right. They didn't teach pacifism at all.

Then, a different faction began to infiltrate and coopt the movement. They turned it into a personality cult centered around a strong leader. They "centralized" the movement, so it would be easier to control it and eventually destroy it from within.

If you ask me, the man who started it wasn't at all the man that today is known as Jesus. And the poor guy who died on the cross wasn't Jesus either. And most people forget that many people died on the cross. There was not just one crucifixion – there were many, as it was a common punishment back in the day.

To summarize: Early Christianity was an attempt of free will ETs to implement a philosophy of personal freedom, but the bad guys were able to choke it off. In other words: The good guys lost.

In the following centuries, Christianity has been fully integrated into the control system of the prison planet, like all the other religions. Its main purpose is to prevent rebellion and produce religious reasons for war, whenever the controllers need a war. It has nothing to do with the initial philosophy.

I recommend the "Fake-Ass Christians" presentation by Mark Passio if you want to know more about original Christianity.

All I'm saying is ask Harvey about this. Something is off with the Jesus project, specifically the one about the crucifixion ruse (maybe not the one about his early life.)

Maybe they viewed the wrong person. Maybe there was a block (hint hint). But they clearly didn't view a good ET committed to free will when viewing the ruse.

I'll repeat: the timelines for disclosure look very different depending on whether or not Farsight asks Harvey and the board about whether the crucifixion of Jesus was a ruse.

We're approaching the critical moment soon. Things are starting to boil in the world. I hope they ask him!

"But they clearly didn't view a good ET committed to free will when viewing the ruse."

Correct.

So the question is: What faction does Harvey belong to?

While I'm convinced that there are free will ETs, I'm still not convinced that Harvey belongs to them. There are too many open questions they leave unanswered. One could argue that we need to find the correct answers ourselves in order to make disclosure possible.

So, maybe just asking Harvey is not the right move. Maybe we should gather our own remote viewing data first and confront the so-called "good ETs" based on the results.

But in order to do it right, we also need to take the possibility into account that the famous crucifixion of Jesus never happened and it's just a story that has been invented to create a religion.

I would say it's more Farsight hasn't been asking the questions more than Harvey hasn't been providing the answers. I want to hear them ask Harvey straight up about the crucifixion ruse.

Nothing wrong with gathering your own data either. I did. For that reason, I think they will get an interesting response if they ask him. :)

I think what most people tend to forget is that "good ETs vs bad ETs" doesn't mean that there are only two factions.

So, if the ETs Farsight is in contact with were the ones responsible for the "crucifixion ruse", why make a remote viewing project that's showing us that there's something off? I mean, it makes them look bad, right?

And why remote view young Jesus, showing us that the person who has been born as Jesus belongs to the ETs and came with a mission?

Why show us that other religions, like Islam, have been started in the same way?

Why show us how ETs who belong to the entity they call "the Domain" came to Earth in order to plant the Vedic traditions?

Why show us that the leader of the Domain is sitting on a thrown, having this arrogant vibe, and that he uses "smoke and mirrors" in order to influence populations?

Why show us that, when Courtney spoke to the Domain, there were no voices discussing his words, meaning that there seems to be no free discourse at all?

Why show us Airl, who belongs to the Domain, as part of an operation influencing the population of Earth?

Does this mean that she belongs to the good ETs?

As I said: You need to observe your assumptions. They are painting a picture here, but maybe it's not a picture about them, but the enemy.

I am not sure why Harvey would be chosen to answer questions about Yeshua/Jesus.

He isn't even Jewish.

Surely, given that Yeshua was Jewish and his 'religion' or belief-system was pure Judaism wouldn't it be a better idea to get answers for his tradition somewhat closer to his Learning System?

For many years I was involved in Christianity and studied Yeshua(Jesus) and his teachings.

If you dig really deeply on the Yeshua story then things will make more sense.

However, trying to connect psychically to the 'Jesus' who, according to Farsights Remote-Viewing, was a man with substantial Mental Health issues, will take you far away from anything that the Rabbi Yeshua was trying to teach.

As far as I am concerned, the original Jesus Ruse video by Farsight really hit a chord. I have held it in my mind as it having given closure on a nearly decade long period in my life.

Ok, Courtney didn't ask Harvey about the Jesus project directly in the latest meeting.

I reached out to Harvey and it's not a concern though. Whether this is cleared up immediately or not doesn't affect their plans for disclosure. Dissonant memory fields, fractures in stories...these will be resolved when our memories are aligned.

The main thing for now is to just recognize something is off, to ask questions, and to see the truth for ourselves.

Answers are coming.