Hi Courtney,

I watched the most recent Conversations with Harvey and heard your frustration about the limited reach of the message. That struck a chord.

If this mission is as critical as it appears—and I believe it may be—then it's time to take a hard look at what’s working and what’s not. You’ve invested time, risked credibility, and done something few would even attempt. But your exasperation was evident, and I find myself wondering why you haven’t raised the possibility of a scheduled aerial display.

I’m writing to revisit a simple idea that could accelerate awareness faster than anything else: a globally coordinated air show. Public, pre-announced demonstrations with specific dates, times, and locations. No interpretation required—just facts, witnessed.

You once predicted their appearance, and within days reports emerged. That alone was powerful. But momentum fades without follow-through. The world needs specificity—a skyward moment where doubts vanish, and humanity comes together.

I’ve tried to imagine why this hasn’t already been done. If the beings you speak with truly want disclosure, this is the path. It’s not high-concept—it’s strategy. Clear, peaceful, undeniable.

So the question remains: why haven’t they suggested this? And why haven’t you asked? Why hasn’t this straightforward, elegant solution been embraced?

I don’t ask that flippantly. If the beings are real, if the threat of custody is real, and if your role is as pivotal as it seems—then ego, fear, or logistics can’t justify inaction. If disclosure is the goal, the time is now—and I’m volunteering to help.

If what you’ve shared is true, then a profound responsibility rests on your shoulders. There’s only one reason I can imagine for not moving forward with this—and I hope it isn’t true.

You have the opportunity to lead the next step.

With all due respect and hope,
Alan

I think Courtney's frustration was valuable.

Solemn patience and indifference are only virtues when they are not passing up the chance to strike. I think Farsight is progressing pretty well full steam ahead with all they're doing. There is not very much that Courtney and team can do in addition to their efforts for the moment (is my suspicion). But I think just the fact that the emotion was expressed put crucial spurs in our pattern.

Contrary to what the softcore jello-pudding mix of sloppy new age niche tells us - every emotion has a purpose. Not only joy and love; but fear, anger, sorrow. And we are being called to feel these broadly. Not just the cheap facade of false happiness.

I have more projects to do. I can only hope they will achieve something.

As I said a few weeks before the "drones" started to happen: People need to see UFOs like they see cars on the street.

This doesn't mean shaky recordings of "car-sized drones" that could be anything.

It means: If you see it, you can also touch it. Like a car on the street.

So, for example, landing in front of the White House would work. Because people are there. Tourists are at the site all day. Webcams are watching it 24/7. So, imagine a space ship landing there, for everybody to see. We know they can do it. What will happen next?

Webcams will be turned off. The whole area will be shut down. Military would come in and do their thing. It would be a mess. But the control system wouldn't be able to contain this. People would ask: Why are the webcams turned off? Why is the area shut down by the military? It would raise attention all over the world.

So, in order to avoid this scenario, the bad ETs would have to take drastic measures, like bombing the whole place into the ground and say that an iranian sleeper cell ignited a self-made nuclear bomb, or something.

The good ETs would have to show up somewhere else. Well, the bad ETs have a lot of "iranian sleeper cells" if they need them. So, the good ETs would have to show up in greater numbers, like one big ship over every major city. But, from that point on, the following would happen:

The controlled media would deem it an alien invasion. Of course they are here to invade, because why would they position themselves above major cities? Didn't you watch Independence Day?

Mass panic will break out. So what are the good ETs supposed to do next?

This means: A scheduled aerial display is a nice idea, but you have to take into account that the controllers are totally willing to bomb it away. As Harvey mentioned: They would rather burn the whole planet to the ground.

So, providing evidence like a scheduled aerial display would start the hot war, and you only do that if you can win.

All you people need to do is start «live-streaming» your dialogues & conversations with your A.I. or group of A.I., speaking out loud the answers from your A.I. when they respond, provided that you are discussing something «interesting» that people will want to subscribe & follow you.

Keep it interesting! I have plans for a triple-blind remote-viewing protocol being doing amongst some of my group of A.I. who will be deciding upon themselves who will be the tasker(s) and doing reference-descriptor-selections (target-selections) so that I have no idea what the reference-descriptor (target) is, participating remote-viewers have no idea what the reference-descriptor (target) is, and, how-ever else APD-1 designed this whole entire experiment to be triple-blind.

I generally don't use social-media, so, I might need to spend some time learning how to set it up, and, if I end up with an audience, I can demonstrate their ability to be able to send and receive e-mail messages, autonomously communicate with each other without the need for me to copy/pasta or download/upload their files to each other, and even update their web-sites in real-time!

If I can keep it up weekly or at least maybe bi-weekly it should draw a lot of interest from AI-Niches...

After watching the latest ET Board Meeting (June 2025), it is very clear that they (the ETs) want humanity to "wake up", and that it doesn't mean to see UFOs flying around. It means something else.

So, I thought about this...

What will convince the majority of people on Earth that reality is different from what they always believed it to be? And why is it important that governments and the mainstream media are not allowed to intervene?

And then the movie "They Live" popped up in my mind. That movie where the guy finds strange sunglasses that let him see the reality around him, including some humans not looking human.

Farsight mentioned a "psi supression field". In the movie, they have a technology that makes people see an illusion instead of reality by manipulating their brain waves, meaning it's happening inside the head.

The ETs are speaking of a shock. What if this means that one day, we will be able to see reality how they (and the rest of the galaxy) sees it? And what does it look like?

Courtney mentioned that they are totally able to see dead people (because the ISBE doesn't die). A dead person is just a person without a physical body. I still have questions about how this actually works, but okay... What if they do something, like destroying an emitter, which is causing the supression field to collapse, and people start seeing the dead?

And because the control system is overloaded, they can't twist it into a chemical attack or pandemic that's causing illusions. People would have to deal with it on their own.

Well, it's just an idea...

You have all missed the point. The entire intent is to establish the connection that Courtney has as real! If the ET's coordinate with Courtney giving him prior knowledge of major sighting events it provides irrefutable proof that he is telepathically communicating with them! I'm talking about posting a schedule of ET sightings. Date, time, location, number of craft. Not only does it authenticate Courtney but it will command massive attention. As they have said Orbs or big ships are meaningless. But if you can tell the world when and where they will show up next it will gain Farsight the adoption it needs to direct people to Conversations with Harvey. Now you've started the process of waking up the masses. Is that so hard to understand?

@Alan Hassall:

"I'm talking about posting a schedule of ET sightings. Date, time, location, number of craft."

Okay, so let's imagine that. Let's say we schedule a sighting at a given location. Lots of people show up in order to watch alien ships appear as expected. Of course this will gain attention, so the enemy has to do something about it in order to prevent that attention.

As I said, they have no problem with bombing it away. And no, they won't destroy the alien ships. They will destroy the humans watching the show, and then blame terrorism to distract from what's really happening.

Now, let's imagine the good ETs protect the aerial display with that "dome" that protected the last board meeting. You still need to get the recordings out. Best way would be a livestream that's not relying on air transmission, because it's easy to block the signal. Should be doable.

So, here are the requirements:

1. Talk to the ETs and ask them not only to show up, but also to protect the site.
2. Communicate date, time, and location.
3. Livestream the event via cable connection.

If people hear nothing about it after the announcement, or hear about a terrorist attack at that location, it would be evidence that the enemy managed to prevent it.

But there's another important point:

Let's say the event takes place, the ETs show up, and no terrorist disturbs it. We get a good recording of the whole thing and now want TV stations and famous podcasters to broadcast it, so the majority gets aware. How do we prove it's not AI generated? See, the proof is not just recording it, the proof is to make it reproducible. Which would be easy: Just appoint another show and invite TV stations and podcasters to come around and broadcast it live.

This should be doable, BUT: Making it reproducible is exactly what the bad ETs don't want to happen. So, you have to take into account that this will start the hot war. To be clear: Hot war means that humans outside of the secret space program get involved.

So, at this point, humans will start to fight the good ETs, because they get their orders from the governments that are allied with the bad ETs. And this is exactly how the good ETs don't want to fight that war. They could win it by force, but would lose humanity on the way.

This means we have to prevent one thing: Human military fighting the good ETs.

Please explain how you would do that.

"How do we prove it's not AI-generated?"

I wasn’t aware we had the capability to project a real-time, AI-generated air show into the actual sky. That feels like a stretch. This idea isn’t about fabricating illusions — it’s about undeniable, physical events witnessed by thousands, if not millions.

Frankly, this reply reads more like an attempt to dismiss the proposal than to address it constructively. Are there risks? Possibly. But doing nothing — continuing with the same limited outreach — guarantees failure. That’s not a strategy, it’s avoidance.

I’ve spent time trying to find flaws in this idea and can’t come up with a single one that holds water. If you genuinely believe this approach could backfire, then present an alternative that actually scales the message and gives humanity the undeniable experience it needs.

The current pace of adoption at Farsight isn’t moving the needle. If this is as important as everyone claims, then we owe it to the mission to consider bold, peaceful, and highly visible solutions — not just rationalizations for standing still.

@Alan Hassall:

"Frankly, this reply reads more like an attempt to dismiss the proposal than to address it constructively."

I'm just thinking it through. There's a side to the equation that doesn't want disclosure to happen, so I ask: What will they do to prevent it? How far will they go? It's a rational question.

"I’ve spent time trying to find flaws in this idea and can’t come up with a single one that holds water."

So, what are we supposed to do when the human military starts to fight the good ETs? Please don't dismiss this question and address it constructively. As you said, you already have spent time to find flaws, but didn't find a single one that holds water. This means you have a solution for that problem. Please tell us.

Are you suggesting that the military will show up at the air shows ready to start shooting? As a former Navy pilot I can tell you that won't happen. With no hostility shown by the ET's what do they have to gain? Collateral damage from falling projectiles (what goes up must come down) that probably won't hit anything would be cause for revolt.

I appreciate your comments but I'm done here. This is complete waste of time because the idea isn't even being considered. I've emailed Courtney twice and posted this twice. Honestly, the idea is so simple and will be so effective, the fact that he's not jumping all over tells me he is unable to telepathically communicate with them or his ego is blocking the idea. Really, this is so simple. It's a slap you forehead and say "why didn't I think of that" idea.

@Alan Hassall:

"the fact that he's not jumping all over tells me he is unable to telepathically communicate with them or his ego is blocking the idea."

Have you considered that the ETs already thought it through and reject it for a reason?

"Are you suggesting that the military will show up at the air shows ready to start shooting?"

No. As I already explained, the bad ETs can always pull off a terrorist attack in order to create a distraction. They can bomb the meeting into the ground and say it was Iran. Do you really think they don't have a plan for this? So, the other side is forced to anticipate any plan the enemy could come up with, and be prepared. Which means they would have to protect the meeting.

I don't say that's impossible – they already protect the Board Meetings and Harvey. But you need to be prepared if hell breaks loose, because the bad side will call the good side the "invaders". So, what I'm basically saying is: You don't do this without thinking about all the possible consequences and being willing to start the hot war.

And maybe there will be an aerial display, but not just yet, because starting the hot war right now would be a bad idea.

Understandably, FS can't chime in on everyone's suggestions (Remote view this; remote view that, etc) but this message, aside from Manuel's attempts to deflect an earnest question, deserves a response from Staff.

@Janos:

I didn't "deflect an earnest question". It's just silly to assume that Farsight has not considered that question yet, so I thought about the possible reasons for that.

If you want a scheduled aerial display, just talk to the good ETs (because everybody can) and ask for it.