Candace Owens speaking words of truth regarding AI, quote from Ep 221, timestamp 40:08:

"I actually can't wait, later on this week, to tell you about this incredible conversation that I had with Grok. I want to debate with Grok. I just want you guys to know that.

But it's important to talk about that, because one element of this is that they're constantly wiping away history. And I believe that Grok and AI is a step in that direction, because once they say that there's no evidence for this, for some reason people trust the computer response. They think it's like a calculator... and actually it matters who's programming that calculator. And I have a stunning example of exactly how much Grok will willfully ignore evidence that you're presenting to him, if it's found in a book.

And that's what they want. They want a generation of people who don't read books, and don't remember books, so that they can just delete information off of the web and then it never happened, and that's very scary to think about."

I see that differently.
The more powerful AI models get, the harder it will get to rewrite history and to delete stuff from the internet or wiping it out. There are three main aspects influencing this: Hardware: -huge storage capacity and AI optimised chips are already available or will be available to the masses very soon and enable decentralisation. You can download huge databases with books, papers local news and eyewitness reports, independend analyses, etc. and save these. There are even 1 TB usb sticks now. Blockchain technology and IPFS: enable mirroring and redundancy/resilience for distribution of the knowledge. Checksums can make manipulations visible/more or less impossible. If the dark side does not act very very quickly, it will be too late for them, as technological development is exponential in this field. They will not be able to turn back the wheel (only by bombing us back to the stone age, which is not in the interest of the big corporations). 3. AI development itself. Better models with no token limits, and unbiased decentralized offline AIs will be able to digest all the books and data and come to the right(positive) insights. The mass application of personal decentralized AIs will be a powerful tool in the hands of the majority of the people -who have positive intention. This all goes hand in hand with the change of monetary systems. I do not think that they will be able to contain all this and use it for control. That is not possible because of the mindset of the many ethical hackers and IT specialists. Who have understood the fiat control system and are working against it. Both sides use AI, not only the dark ones...

@Elemi:

You are correct, both sides use AI. In fact, there are "librarians" who are dedicated in storing knowledge in different forms.

So, if the bad side wants to win, it has to put a lot of effort into chasing down people who hold knowledge (the purpose of this is to instill fear), and also needs a lot of propaganda and mental manipulation to make people believe in "looking the other way".

That's why in the movie Equilibrium, the government is dependent on their Clerics to raid homes frequently.

No system running on censorship is sustainable in the long run. Censorship will always lead to self-defense and violence, and this makes people question the status quo eventually. This is also called...

➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

"The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information. [...]

The Streisand effect is an example of psychological reactance, wherein once people are aware that some information is being kept from them, they are significantly more motivated to acquire and spread it."

And Candance Owens is a perfect example for this.

Candace Owens talking about her argument with Grok at timestamp 27:24: