Right now, the Vault cannot be considered objective because, while the data was being collected under blind conditions from the viewers perspective, it wasn't collected without interference by other beings.

Courtney described it as follows: The viewers perception is channeled through the mind of a member of the good ETs, maybe even through technology, such that the person or technology can help to penetrate protected targets (like Epstein) and get a clearer picture of what really happened. Farsight's viewers are given a piggyback ride, so to speak.

While this sounds like a good thing at first, the very fact that the viewers are going through another mind raises the question of whether that "assistance" enables the other side to manipulate the viewer's perceptions.

In order to make the Vault a trustworthy source of information, it must fulfill the following requirements:

1. Tag for channeled targets, so everybody can see whether the remote viewing was conducted under the assistance of external minds or technology.

2. Tag for protected targets, so everybody can see whether viewers will face blocks or backlash when viewing without assistance.

3. Viewings of the same target with and without assistance, so we can get a sense for how the target protection works.

4. Make the vault a public project and allow non-Farsight viewers to add their results as well.

5. Add the token size of the transcript to each file. This is necessary information, because cross-examining transcripts can lead to problems regarding the token limit of AI. The token size of the transcripts seems to be around 25k. With a token limit of 128k (ChatGPT 4o), you cannot compare more than 5 files at a time, and you shouldn't even do that, because there's other things in the context window as well. Being mindful of the token size is important to avoid AI hallucination.