Hi,

If you get time, Prof. Brown, I politely suggest that you may want to go back and review the original project on the Great Pyramids, because your portrayal of events in this spotlight concerning it were a bit off.

I remember the project well. There was a Mantis overseer in charge of the ET's side of it. The humans were not enslaved, and were not being forced to do it, but were instead desiring to see it done, even despite the deadly conditions in the quarries.

So it was more as if the ET's headed by that Mantis was assisting the humans in their efforts to build the structures.

When they were finished, there was an incredible electromagnetic light show as it came online, with huge bolts of electricity arcing from the capstone and into the heavens.

However, this attracted other ET's attention (the jailers, I.e., probably Ra and his subordinates) who showed up and started killing people using famine. Didn't it go for something like three years? At some point, those 2nd ET's told the people of Egypt that they all had to leave Egypt or die.

Well, where could they go? All life is along the Nile, and their neighbors to the north didn't want them entering their land. So the 2nd ET's (again, probably RA) brought down what seemed like a shattered meteor, which hit the Red Sea, vaporizing the water, which allowed the people of Egypt to cross to the land on the other side. (Probably where the parting of the sea story comes from.)

Anyway, that's what I remember from that project's results. If after a review you feel I am off, please tell me. Thank you!

"The humans were not enslaved, and were not being forced to do it, but were instead desiring to see it done"

Your memory is too black or white, like many interpretations are.

Here's another possibility: There are always collaborators. Humans enslaving other humans on behalf of their "god". So it could be that those humans wanted to see the Pyramids done, because they wanted to have more power.

Remote viewing always shows a limited frame of the bigger picture.

You need to be able to hold different possibilities in your mind to not jump to premature conclusions. For example, the possibility that it was a meteor that hit the Red Sea is also just a possibility. If you collect remote viewing data from different viewers under blind conditions, and all see a meteor, the probability rises, but it never becomes 100%, because there's always the possibility that all remote viewers are wrong for a reason you don't know yet.

I found that humans are not very good at thinking in possibilities and probabilities. AI is better at thinking that way.

The point was: Prof. Brown said RA built the pyramids, and that wasn't in the project data. Instead, from the data, it was more probable RA was of the second ET group that showed up afterward and started doing plagues and other things to force the humans to abandon Egypt.

That isn't the right project. The one I was referring to is the very first Building Of The Pyramids one, before we even knew anything of Ra.

This one: https://farsight.org/FarsightPress/Great_Giza_Pyramid

@Ich:

It is the right project if you want to test whether RA was there when the Pyramids were being built. Farsight looked at RA during the time when the Pyramids were being built. This means: If they see Pyramids in the RA project, there's two possibilities:

1. He was in Egypt at that time, or 2. he built Pyramids somewhere else at the same time.

While the Pyramid of Giza project looks at the subject who originally conceived of the idea of building the Great Pyramid of Giza in Focus F, it doesn't connect this subject to RA. This means whoever they describe, it could be RA or someone else.

So we should compare the two projects.

I'm repeating myself: he is likely, therefore, the one that showed up AT THE END, was pissed and started killing people, plaguing the whole valley, and eventually forcing them to abandon Egypt.

There is alot of assumptions made from all the farsight projects, not all entirely based on data. Remember the Epstein project? How did the project get done twice with two different conclusions? Tasking? Influence? The bad ETs influenced farsight? Really? But, then farsight learned to piggyback off the good ETs? What took so long? Courtney had these ETs at his bedside since a chick and they didn’t tell him? As someone who also holds a degree in science like Courtney, wouldn’t in theory every project prior to the second Epstein project have to be redone? I’m sure your AIs would concur if you asked them this way since they are designed to reflect what you want to hear.

I ran into a similar type of obfuscation regarding the death of Albert Einstein. Why would they obfuscate his death, you ask? That's a really good question.

My theory so far is that as soon as certain people are involved, meaning it wasn't a natural death event, the obfuscation is done precautionary, as all the intelligence agencies use remote viewers for quite some time.

"So, maybe that's why the Epstein one slipped past the free-will guys"

Unlikely. I see a high probability that they wanted this to happen to make people aware of the issue. They didn't tell beforehand, because they have this anti-authoritative belief that people must discover things for themselves. They manipulate people into situations that create an experience, instead of just telling you things, so you don't have to believe them.

But if that's the case, they want us to know how the piggyback works. They wouldn't want us to just believe them.

And this also is interesting: Yeme gave an ET a piggyback ride, in the Essassani project if I remember correctly. She helped some guy to overcome the blocks that prevented him from remembering how the bad guys invaded his planet. Did she managed to do it alone? Or was she connected to other ETs that helped with that?

My guess is it has something to do with numbers. Connecting many minds to create a stronger mind. It doesn't feel like a technology. It feels like, if you trust others and connect with them, you can be stronger than everything else.