Farsight, please, don't make "movies" with AI-generated content to compete against Netflix for attention.

See, people are not stupid. When we watch Netflix, we know it's fantasy. Because in that moment, we want fantasy as a distraction from a stressful life as a prisoner on a prison planet.

If you make videos that look like Disney, they will also become a distraction. And that's totally not what they should be.

The problem is not that your videos aren't "fancy" enough.

The problem is that the truth of living on a prison planet is uncomfortable. If you make it a fantasy story, people will put you in the category of a fictional Sci-Fi show. And we already have enough of that.

Make your videos like a documentary. Hard data, science, and corroboration with facts. "Data collected under totally blind conditions" is your unique selling point.

Learn from Veritasium on YouTube. They have fancy video clips as well, but they don't use them for interpretation. They use their visuals for representation of what they are talking about.

For example, a video clip of alien spiders weaving a human body in the Tower of Babel project isn't at all a representation of what Aziz is talking about. It's an interpretation of a bigger picture, and a highly subjective one. It's weird – while you recognize and mark deductions when remote viewing, your visuals in the videos scream "highly subjective deduction".

Stick with science. Crunch data and statistics. Draw on boards. Wear glasses and white coats instead of furry cat ears.

Disney is for people who don't want to know the truth.

Couldn't have said it better :-)

All good points. It is a distraction to have images which do not fit into the context. (Schema-) Inconguencies can be used to create attention in the first place, but if they appear too often and cannot be linked into the context, then they will create avoidence. One has to explain all incongruencies (letting the customer somehow learn how the incongruency fits into the context -that is positive) or it will be bad for marketing. Otherwise one has to go with congruencies (what the customer expects: that is calming him, but this does not create attention by arousal). An endless stream of non-fitting images like in some AI generated YT videos is very bad and I switch these off immediately -regardless of the audio content. With leonardo for example one can make good images from sketches combined with text input (in legacy mode) more or less for free. Videos with a bad AI voice (there are also some really good ones already) or youtube voice over (auto translate) are also low quality from my point of view. The translations are so bad and one cannot simply deactivate these and switch to the original when watching on a phone. Having both, endless presentations with extremely low information density or redundant stuff like long elaborations about single aspects of surroundings (which are are already very hard to follow) and non-fitting symbolic imagery together is a switch-off for me. I would rather read 20 or 30 pages of text. I can do that much quicker and thus remember much more about the content than just watching a non-crunchy and tiring video. Maybe improved summaries (/ own interpretatios what they might have seen) of the viewings by the viewers themselves, together with the target description as displayed text (more often, longer and at the right place), would help to make it more entertaining and accessible, too.

"Maybe improved summaries (/ own interpretatios what they might have seen) of the viewings by the viewers themselves"

I think the target reveal dialogues are a very good way to achieve this. Having a back and forth of questions and ideas is more fun to watch. That's where Courtney should focus his attention, instead of holding monologues.

Idea:

Make one target reveal with all viewers present. They did it once with Yeme and Melena in the War in Heaven project. Discussing the target with all viewers in a board meeting format could yield interesting discussions.

The Youtube numbers went down really dramatically:
https://vidiq.com/youtube-stats/channel/UC2VSjjaxNyYDZrBxrYQzcJQ/
They need content in which the audience is really interested in. That was the ET stuff in Dec last year but the ET friends let them down with the bigger ships. So such disclosure predictions are a dangerous field now. With the mix of channeling results into Mystery/History Projects, the reputation may fall again. Hubert is absolutely right that Farsight's strength was the scientific approach. But there is not even a good explaination video about the linguistic stats by Courtney. Future Forecasters have more science than Farsight right now. They are doing projects on technology, and their results can be measured by looking how the charts are developping after their predictions. Not only the entertainment value is getting lower, but also the informative value. It think a refocus would be good. This could be the AI RV topic, but with scientific stuff like how to improve the protocols, data validity, reproducibility and FSAI projects (AI viewing results by Farsight) -that would eventually bring new audience from the AI tech community. Or they could revive the monthly news forecasting project. The board meetings should be restructured to get clear results and information. They are boring and have a lot of repetitive and redundant content and also a lot of eso language which does not say anything of real value. Its like somebody is doing a delaying tactic.