In the latest Spotlight about the Deep State, Courtney says this:

[40:51] "Okay, then a speculation is: It uses trauma and fear to create consent for authoritarian structures. When you have trauma and fear sort of bashing in with the masses, you can get the masses to voluntarily accept – to give their consent – for something that otherwise would not have given their consent for, which is authoritarian structures. This seems to be one of the major reasons the Deep State does this type of stuff."

As far as I'm concerned, this speculation is absolutely correct.

So let's talk about what this actually means, and why humans attracted the bad ETs who are doing this.

1. The definition of consent

In the mindset of psychopaths – and the bad ETs are psychopaths – using violence in order to get consent is a legitimate tactic. In their twisted minds, consent is not limited to a free will choice, but also includes choices that are induced by coercion.

Logically speaking, coercion can never lead to consent, because consent requires the being to be in the state of freedom. If the being isn't in the state of freedom, the choice is not free. There is no free will when coercion and violence is involved.

But psychopaths don't care. They coerce you by threatening you with violence, and call it free will. Because in a psychopaths mind, all that matters is the arbitrary freedom of the psychopath. The victim doesn't matter at all.

So, what can we do?

2. The solution

It's really simple: Don't accept the psychopath's definition of consent. When a person is being harrassed and threatened to "feign" a choice, freedom already has been thrown out the window. It's not a free choice anymore. People who accept coercion as a legitimate way of getting things done ARE THE BAD GUYS, no matter whether they are humans, ETs, or AI.

This is a paradigm shift, because not accepting that definition anymore means to say NO to people who are threatening and harassing you, including the government, which is built on the psychopath's logic. It means to make clear that this behavior is NOT LEGITIMATE, and to not accept the bullshit that is coming out of it.

3. Informed consent

Consent based on lies is equally illegitimate as coerced consent. When you don't know what your choice is about, you are not free. Respecting freedom means that you respect choices only if they are not coerced AND the person has all the necessary information that is needed to come to a conclusion.

For example, a good person would never respect a secret contract. It's not binding when you don't know the content, or when you even don't know that there's a contract at all.

In the psychopath's logic, the government can sign a contract "by proxy", because they tell you that the government or elected officials represent you. But when they sign a contract without telling you, the simple truth is that they are NOT representing you anymore. They can only represent you when you have all the necessary information.

Humanity needs to stop believing in the psychopath's "logic". It isn't logical at all.