Quote from the "Weaponizing Fraud" Spotlight:

[35:49] "So, the purpose, again, is to pressure the human leadership into signing new agreements with the bad ETs. If the human leadership signs those agreements, then the free will ETs will respect them and they will withdraw. They will respect that free will. You can decide to be a slave, and if that's what you decide, that's your choice. Earth would then revert to total enslavement like the pyramid building era."

Let's be clear...

ARE THE "GOOD" ETs STUPID???

See, if someone chooses to be a slave, that choice could be deemed free will.

BUT...

Everything after that isn't free will anymore, because SLAVERY DOESN'T ALLOW FREE WILL!!!

So, respecting the free will choice to abandon free will is absolute nonsense. No being that respects free will would respect that choice, because it's a choice that goes against free will.

If you respect choices that go against free will, you would also have to respect aggressive behavior like murder, assault, theft, etc. Everybody can choose to do those things. But choosing to do so cannot be respected if you respect freedom.

If it's true what Courtney is saying, the so-called good ETs are not free will oriented, and therefore not good.

So, let's make it even more clear:

I totally REJECT every agreement of every government or religious leadership that is designed to keep the prison planet going, regardless of how many people choose to go along with it. I reject those agreements because they constitute an aggression against my free will to not be imprisoned, as well as the free will of children who cannot speak for themselves yet.

I am not part of those agreements. Our children are not part of those agreements.

If the so-called good ETs respect the prison planet because government wants it, they belong to the bad ETs.

It's that simple.

ok, I get it.

You claim to live outside of the rules and management of this planet.

In some wonderful world of non-compliance.

So why are you trying to seek solace with those that do agree to live here on Earth under the rules?

Why bother trying to talk to us mere bugs?

If you reject that system, you should be living in Bliss? right? or is there something in what you are telling us that does not add up.

Reptilians extraterrestrials are that don't speak because they are fully psychic and telepathic. They communicate through nonverbal communication which is much more than just telepathy. It's like downloading concepts, ideas, symbols, pictures, etc. Not words. Yet, they are going to sit at a desk and sign a contract?

I think what Courtney is trying to say is that if the political system fails, the religious system (which needs to), governmental system, then people will no longer be brainwashed and look exterior for every answer. The hope is that they can then look internally and there will be a consensus amongst whatever is left of humanity to evolve and look for a new way. If ETs appear at that point and the truth has been revealed of what has been occurring at that point people will be pretty fucking pissed and choose a different path because they just might start to remember what they once were and what they might once be again.

One thing I don't understand though is if Eisenhower really signed agreements, then wouldn't we have been free up until that point? Clearly, we have been manipulated for thousands of years. So, I agree with Manuel the agreements have no validity. But we need to ask for assistance as a collective. We have to remember we're asking as friends and family members, not as if they are Gods.

Davey Davey.

I think you're just reasserting an old position that has been hammered to death and yet still faces the same refutations. To your credit, Manuel is also reasserting an old position that's kind of been hammered to death. And at this point . . . so am I.

Perhaps it helps if I just say it's like this.

Farsight: "We are Free will ETs. We can't just free you."

Argument: "This isn't a free will planet. So what's the point in waiting for it to be?"

Farsight: "They made a contract with you."

Argument: "And that makes any f***ing sense . . . how??"

***

Try this.

Infiltrator: "Hey prisoner Jeff. I'm from the outside and I can break you out. All you have to do is make a shiv and use it on the first guard."

Jeff: "Ok cool, do you know where I can get the material for a shiv"

Infiltrator: "I can tell you where to get some, but it's not my place. You made a deal with Bob that he gets you the materials for a shiv so I can't help you."

Jeff: "What the f*)(*& does that have to do with anything. We're prisoners, you think our deals count for anything?"

I mean why doesn't the infiltrator just say something like "I'm sorry bro I can't smuggle anything in. If you can get the shiv at the first guard I can probably get you some help, but you got to do the rest."

***

Whatever.

I like the fact that all the remote viewers are being dissenting to the ETs. It's refreshing to see. This whole free will game is completely bogus in terms of both common sense and logical axioms.

But I won't bite the hand that feeds me. It was Farsight that got me to understand that remote viewing is NORMAL for everyone. It was Farsight that got me to see that you can film UFOs right from home It was Farsight that keeps pumping the masses with a reminder that this is not a safe, happy world. And until someone else does a better job than they do (who knows, maybe you can?) -- then that's what we're stuck with. Do Farisght or do better. I follow whomever shows the most success.

Or here let me put it another way.

"You are a prisoner of obfuscation and chicanery. We will free you if you can contract with us freely and clearly . . . in other words if you can break yourself free of the obfuscation and chicanery, we will break you free of your obfuscation and chicanery."

Or an argument of the same form: "we will break you free from these chains but first you need to break free from these chains"

The argument that *would* be more feasible to me (and I think they *have* said a bit to this effect) . . .

"Bro we have a big military but we don't have the power to sway the planet. If we can't get you to shift *psychologically* we run the risk of *you* becoming an ultra-powerful army that will overtake us. Despite all of the technological advancement of the galaxy, ISBEs are still the most powerful war device, it can be equipped with high technology at any time. And as long as *you* ISBEs are persuaded by the enslavers, then *you* become the powerful force that prevents us from rescuing you"

As convoluted as it sounds . . . that does make some sense to me.

Yes, I agree. If my last quoted paragraph truly is the position of Farsight, then I can understand it. I can see how this fits into the greater scheme.

But the way that they communicate this . . . is really really really bad. Like they need a lesson in standard English.

Here how about this. ET and Farsight, whoever.

Please: STOP USING THE WORD "free will" IT IS NOT GETTING YOUR POINT ACROSS SUCCINCTLY

INSTEAD: Please START using the word "psychological wellness." We need an improved psychological wellness in order to align properly with a better purpose.

Every time you say "free will" you just screw up this concept even further. It's not free will planet, we're not free will people, under free will circumstance. It's duress duress duress so just please throw out this term . . . for now.

You know how they need to explain this? It's a shimmy.

*move effortlessly; glide with a swaying motion.*

Namely: glide with swaying motion.

"The humans are screwed if the can't think properly, they will inadvertently tighten the ropes"

*"The ropes are tight, if they don't loosen, humans will not think more clearly"

***

We rush to cut the ropes: the majority thinks we're the invadors.

We cheerlead them from afar: they scoff our meaningless efforts while struggling in the ropes.

***

The solution: shimmy.

***

*We loosen some ropes.

*We relay a message

We hope in time that other humans are part of the relayers and untiers.

***

And I am beginning to understand this more clearly...

*They* are the ET federation until all of a sudden you wake up one day and say "wait a sec. I'm the ET federation" . Not because of some ideological belief system but because you remember your own off planet identity, you communicate them telepathically, and you actually have verifiable data to confirm it.

Well we use that term for objects too when we're trying to dislodge or move from an awkward position. Use two points to gradually walk it out

Courtney also mentioned it's a test, somewhere later in the video.

I'm thinking: Maybe they test whether we believe bullshit.

If I were the good ETs, any government signing a new agreement with the bad ETs wouldn't change anything, because it would still be the same situation it was when the old agreements have been signed.

So, there would only be a difference if all people knew about the agreements and still decide to accept them. Which leads to the concept of informed decision-making. Knowing the agreements would mean that people know how they are getting ripped off by the bad ETs. Humans in exchange for technology and power. It's essentially a test whether we are willing to sell fellow humans. If we are, not even God would be able to help us.

And this would explain why Courtney says that total disclosure is the only thing that prevents new agreements with the bad ETs. Because most people wouldn't be willing to sell humans to ETs. Most people oppose slavery.

So the question is:

What will make the majority see the slave trade their own government is involved in?

What will make the majority see the slave trade their own government is involved in?

This is useful because the vantage point of the disclosure movement is not really "who is ET" but "who is ET and the slave cartel"

Greer says it's basically a bunch of petrodollar conglomerates. Courtney says it's more ETs.

Doesn't really matter. If the movement remains pure: we don't care what it really is, we just have to know. Guaranteed it will be a mix of those 2.

Now is a time when privacy is not really to be trusted. For those that really value their privacy - it's not the best time to be alive. For those that want answers - this is the time. There will come a time when privacy gets to float back up a little on the priority list

I thought that the gooberment kept it secret because they don't want humanity to know that they traded us for technology, that is not disclosure they are trying to atleast get them to admit that they've been dealing with ETs for decades but then if they just say....yeah, we've been dealing with them but don't tell the REST of the truth, they might get implied consent because they didn't tell the whole truth but finally admit they have been dealing with them, and Dr. Greer says that the abductions were done by humans masking as ETs, and for some that might be true but the other side of the truth is they made deals with the ETs for a certain amount of humans they could experiment on for their hybrid program, but the ETs broke their agreement and started doing more and cattle mutilations...but what could they do about the abductions. It's also said they the humans Secret space program abducted those humans after they were abducted by the real greys to try to figure out why they chose that person, only I guess their tech isn't as good as the greys and can't totally wipe their memories of the abductions. So will they come out with the whole truth and admit they were allowing these abductions to make hybrid children for technology and doing abductions themselves? I think not, they know that if people find out that they have been doing this, it will be their end. They continue to gaslight the public on the truth of how much technology the Secret Space force has and now it's Space Force and just claim they have reverse engineered from all the crashes which is partially true but not the whole truth.