Quote from the "Weaponizing Fraud" Spotlight:

[35:49] "So, the purpose, again, is to pressure the human leadership into signing new agreements with the bad ETs. If the human leadership signs those agreements, then the free will ETs will respect them and they will withdraw. They will respect that free will. You can decide to be a slave, and if that's what you decide, that's your choice. Earth would then revert to total enslavement like the pyramid building era."

Let's be clear...

ARE THE "GOOD" ETs STUPID???

See, if someone chooses to be a slave, that choice could be deemed free will.

BUT...

Everything after that isn't free will anymore, because SLAVERY DOESN'T ALLOW FREE WILL!!!

So, respecting the free will choice to abandon free will is absolute nonsense. No being that respects free will would respect that choice, because it's a choice that goes against free will.

If you respect choices that go against free will, you would also have to respect aggressive behavior like murder, assault, theft, etc. Everybody can choose to do those things. But choosing to do so cannot be respected if you respect freedom.

If it's true what Courtney is saying, the so-called good ETs are not free will oriented, and therefore not good.

So, let's make it even more clear:

I totally REJECT every agreement of every government or religious leadership that is designed to keep the prison planet going, regardless of how many people choose to go along with it. I reject those agreements because they constitute an aggression against my free will to not be imprisoned, as well as the free will of children who cannot speak for themselves yet.

I am not part of those agreements. Our children are not part of those agreements.

If the so-called good ETs respect the prison planet because government wants it, they belong to the bad ETs.

It's that simple.

ok, I get it.

You claim to live outside of the rules and management of this planet.

In some wonderful world of non-compliance.

So why are you trying to seek solace with those that do agree to live here on Earth under the rules?

Why bother trying to talk to us mere bugs?

If you reject that system, you should be living in Bliss? right? or is there something in what you are telling us that does not add up.

Reptilians extraterrestrials are that don't speak because they are fully psychic and telepathic. They communicate through nonverbal communication which is much more than just telepathy. It's like downloading concepts, ideas, symbols, pictures, etc. Not words. Yet, they are going to sit at a desk and sign a contract?

I think what Courtney is trying to say is that if the political system fails, the religious system (which needs to), governmental system, then people will no longer be brainwashed and look exterior for every answer. The hope is that they can then look internally and there will be a consensus amongst whatever is left of humanity to evolve and look for a new way. If ETs appear at that point and the truth has been revealed of what has been occurring at that point people will be pretty fucking pissed and choose a different path because they just might start to remember what they once were and what they might once be again.

One thing I don't understand though is if Eisenhower really signed agreements, then wouldn't we have been free up until that point? Clearly, we have been manipulated for thousands of years. So, I agree with Manuel the agreements have no validity. But we need to ask for assistance as a collective. We have to remember we're asking as friends and family members, not as if they are Gods.

Davey Davey.

I think you're just reasserting an old position that has been hammered to death and yet still faces the same refutations. To your credit, Manuel is also reasserting an old position that's kind of been hammered to death. And at this point . . . so am I.

Perhaps it helps if I just say it's like this.

Farsight: "We are Free will ETs. We can't just free you."

Argument: "This isn't a free will planet. So what's the point in waiting for it to be?"

Farsight: "They made a contract with you."

Argument: "And that makes any f***ing sense . . . how??"

***

Try this.

Infiltrator: "Hey prisoner Jeff. I'm from the outside and I can break you out. All you have to do is make a shiv and use it on the first guard."

Jeff: "Ok cool, do you know where I can get the material for a shiv"

Infiltrator: "I can tell you where to get some, but it's not my place. You made a deal with Bob that he gets you the materials for a shiv so I can't help you."

Jeff: "What the f*)(*& does that have to do with anything. We're prisoners, you think our deals count for anything?"

I mean why doesn't the infiltrator just say something like "I'm sorry bro I can't smuggle anything in. If you can get the shiv at the first guard I can probably get you some help, but you got to do the rest."

***

Whatever.

I like the fact that all the remote viewers are being dissenting to the ETs. It's refreshing to see. This whole free will game is completely bogus in terms of both common sense and logical axioms.

But I won't bite the hand that feeds me. It was Farsight that got me to understand that remote viewing is NORMAL for everyone. It was Farsight that got me to see that you can film UFOs right from home It was Farsight that keeps pumping the masses with a reminder that this is not a safe, happy world. And until someone else does a better job than they do (who knows, maybe you can?) -- then that's what we're stuck with. Do Farisght or do better. I follow whomever shows the most success.