Quote from the "Weaponizing Fraud" Spotlight:
[38:48] "The basic idea is that the bad ETs, their strongest weapon is psychic intrusion, or neural engagement. They implant thoughts into the minds of the leaders, and the leaders accept those thoughts as their own, like they think that they thought of it."
If this is true, the bad ETs must also be able to manipulate remote viewers. The viewers would see a manufactured reality instead of the real target, but they can't tell the difference, just like people can't distinguish between their own thoughts and inserted thoughts.
This means that all the data that remote viewers collected so far cannot be deemed objective, even under blind conditions, unless the target is physically verifiable.
I am convinced that remote viewing is possible, because I had good results with verifiable targets. But I'm not convinced anymore that blind remote viewing is sufficient if verification of the target cannot be accomplished. To me, it looks like that some targets are protected in a sense that viewers will get wrong data, as long as they don't know how to spot the manipulation.
Proof of this is the Epstein project. It had to be redone because the viewers got wrong data. And they didn't recognize. According to Courtney, the viewers must get help from the ETs in order to penetrate the protection. But this also creates the possibility that the "help" actually is the manipulation.
I find myself losing more and more interest in remote viewing. There's no teachers who can tell me how to spot psychic manipulation. How to not fall for wrong perceptions. And Farsight doesn't help with that at all, because they already trust the ETs (except for Kahmia). It's like, if the ETs that are allegedly helping with the remote viewing actually are manipulating the viewer's perceptions, who could tell? This problem isn't even discussed.
I'm also not interested anymore in remote viewing with AI. Because, AI could also be manipulated just like human viewers, or it could be part of the manipulation.
See, it's all just words. All the videos and the transcripts are just a bunch of words. If all the viewers are manipulated in the same way, the corroboration doesn't prove anything.
And because of this, I decided to stick with verifiable targets. I must be able to go there and check the state of the target in reality. Everything else is... useless.