Lately, you’ve been posting “solo” sessions where only one remote viewer looks at a target. This goes against the idea of making Farsight’s remote-viewing results scientific. To be meaningful, at least three sessions from three different viewers are needed to measure accuracy. With just one viewer, the results are entertaining, but not reliable.

Who's to say they didn't span it out and more videos to come? If the target has verifiable elements that provides evidence.

I would love to see more community members do things like "remote view the first Farsight publication in October" and you get multiple viewers that way.

We actually had an experiment where I tasked a session with Aziz. Del did the session and she landed all of his focuses.

It tells us that *you can piggy back other sessions*