I feel like I "get" crucial pieces of history well enough that I can look at it from a cultural vantage point rather than just a technical one. A sort of "this is why it happened this way" rather than "event 1, 2, 3 . . . "
I've become notorious for talking about "America." America is not the center of the universe. People talk about Americans as arrogant. But they're not. Sure, some are. But overall, there is something about this land mass on the north american continent that I believe holds a crucial domino, a fulcrum, of many nodes. It's not about who's better or worse. It's just about where the chips have fallen and how we make do with it. But I want to get at this quickly.
First off, we might think polarizingly about the invasion of Turtle Island. Indeed, it was an invasion because you can't call it a peaceful merging of ideals. However: We must accept the fact that there *were* peaceful bonds, and cultural mergings throughout all of it. The natives were for the most part tribal. They understood nations to be moving, rogue, transient, flexible, dynamic, shifting, nomadic . . . whatever other adjective synonyms fit there. The setlors were not staunch roman soldiers. They were random mixes. And while the spaniards, descending from the Visigoths, were prepared to try and command south america into a central monarchy with its henchmen, north america was headed a different direction.
The British wanted to do for north america what the spaniards had done to south america. They probably didn't even realize the two landmasses converge at panama. They probably thought themselves in competition.
Let it also be recognized that Britain was just an arm of a more octopus-like deep state. It has many names, but it has a lot of evidence, linking its tendrils together toward a body that doesn't like to be fully seen. That octopus is alive and well, but it's pretty scared of the exposure it's getting. And also scared of what we'll do to it when we know where it really is. This post is part of that search.
Back to the story. The people of britain were not quite as loyal as the spaniards. They had already gone through tyrannical kings, revolts, and bitter-sweet compromises threaded in their cultural memory. They didn't want centralization. They knew the temptation of tyranny and its flavour. So they formed, like the tribes . . . nations.
There was the nation of Texas, the nation of Albequerque, the nation of New York . . .
These nations realized that to defend themselves against the bigger armies that are out there, they need to form bonds. Alliances. They don't all have to agree with one another on every given thing. They just need some central tenets, things that will motivate them enough to fight for the same general goal. It worked. They formed what was called the Union. And they fought as the Union. And they won . . . sort of.
You see, they had a lot of former soldiers and generals and engineers among their people, they were not stupid to war and they fought hard and skillfully . . . they were not genius when it comes to . . . social science. Courtney's favorite word.
And what happened? The octopus could feel the slicing of its british tendril off the coast, and moved to its higher levels of intelligent control. Social science.
The union at this time had no "immigration." What was immigration? People came, people went. And your job as anybody living on the land was to address people that stand before you whoever they are whenever they come. There was really nothing else. Well the octopus knew the opportunity that was there. What happened? Over the next century . . . a perversion of words . . . many many words we take for granted.
The nations became gradually known more and more as "nation states." And the "nation states" became gradually shortened into "states." The Union, which was the federation, became more and more merged with the "states" until it was the "United States." And the original nations that formed a united federation (the united nations) became more often referred to as a country, a nation, in singular. And the foreign bureaucratic order that had metasticized itself onto the federation with the tag of "District of Columbia" and its obsconding of the "British Administrative Regency" began a new direction in which they would help form the "United Nations" , a foreign order making arbitrary definitions about what it considers a nation under its membership, and spoke as much and as often as possible . . . with an aire of authority.
And the little changes of capitals, and dictionaries, and schematics and even just little "preferred phrases" that wandering charismatic visitors would use. Changes like "citizen of the Union" into "U.S. Citizen" . . . and the meanings of a completely scrambled ideal.
Money . . . presidency . . . contract . . . trust . . . bond . . .
Sooooo many words. Forgive the expression. *FUCKED DRY* by a quiet hand that was just slowly working its way around the continent.
The point of this post is that we're not talking about history that is done and gone and they won and it's too late, you're screwed, beat it, shut up.
The point is that *WE ARE CATCHING THE PROCESS RED HANDED!* They didn't finalize that plan. They are *in* the process. They are *trying* to finish it, and it's not quite done. We see all kinds of loose little threads that with each new media drill and bureaucratic "bill" we start to see the direction they have been trying to move in. And most interestingly: That they despearately realize they are not quite there yet while we're all starting to notice.
That's why this piece of history is important for me to express.
So now . . . they have a few strategies. First of all they have these people.
"None of that matters anymore, the whole world is going to change and it's going to be glorious." Channelers, anybody? Organized religion, anybody?
"It's too late, we're all in hell." A little more rare, but you see those downtrodden faces. This one echoes less in words and more like an emotional frequency. Well . . . guess what war is bloody and tiring. Did we forget that?
Ok, let's cast a little beacon of hope before we close this post.
People are doing 3 major things.
1: identifying the social science scaffold that pins their identity into one thing vs another AND . . . placing their mark in recognition of their own sovereignty and ***clarifying*** their identity before someone can do it for them. What you probably think is a US citizen is not.
2: identifying the social science scaffold of resources that pins their identity with a jargon of resource-affiliated-mush and ***clarifying*** what the true resources are, based on their true identity. What you probably think is called money is not.
3: identifying the social science scaffold of **NATIONS** that pins the false notions that are completely inaccurate, and ***clarifying*** the nations that they choose for themselves. Such as the state citizens. And if you really want, sure, "sovcits." But it does not stop there.
Don't automatically think that this is some subthread completely unrelated to what Farsight is doing. I have been comparing notes to this kind of information and to what Aziz remote viewed with Airl, when she described how the world changes to a preferred trajectory.
I don't think these two things are unrelated. I think what I'm talking about, and what Airl was talking about, are linked. Sure, call it a hunch, I don't care. I think it's a worthwhile hunch.
Well that's enough. Gonna go . . . work as a "care aide"