I'm convinced now that Farsight is in contact with beings who I wouldn't call good.

Quote from the first Synthesis Spotlight:

[45:53] "It is the signature of an unresolved equation in consciousness itself. The universe – the whole universe it seems – still cannot decide who should own awareness: the master, or the sovereign soul. You know where we're heading with this: We believe the sovereign soul should be the one that owns consciousness."

WTF?!

If Farsight – and the so-called good ETs – really believe this, they don't believe in true freedom.

Because true freedom would mean to not want to own the consciousness of others!

I mean, isn't this exactly how the prison planet started in the first place? Those people are bad, so let's wipe their memory in order to "correct" their consciousness.

So, this whole struggle is a fight about who owns consciousness. This, as far as I'm concerned...

MAKES BOTH SIDES BAD!!!

It's not at all about the universe trying to decide who owns consciousness. Everybody already owns it!

A master – which is an ISBE that wants to own other ISBEs – doesn't lose consciousness. Because only with consciousness comes responsibility. Denying someone else to own consciousness means to deny that that person is responsible for its own actions.

You shouldn't even treat children like that. Even children are responsible for their actions, it's just that parents protect their children as long as they aren't able to understand the consequences of their actions. But they shouldn't protect children by owning their consciousness. They should protect them by helping them to get conscious in the first place!

If so many ISBEs out there really believe in this fight about who owns consciousness, it's no wonder that the galaxy experiences one holocaust after another.

Is there actually one person out there who knows that true freedom means to not own others?

You don't seem to have any base understanding of consciousness and how it works.

Typically, you start your post as a question.

But it is really a lecture on something that you don't want to really understand because you are locked into only believing what you currently believe, and can't step out of that narrow belief system.

Consider a Planet.

Can it be considered a consciousness on it's own?

are the Individuals on the planet completely their own consciousness or are they part of the collective consciousness?

So what if the 'Good ET's" are one group that have a different idea on what freedom is than the "Bad ET's"?

Post after Post you complain that reality does not follow your personal definition of a particular word.

You are at it again.

To answer your question, if you are using "Bad ET word definitions" then of course, the "Good ETs" no matter what they do are going to seem bad.

So it's easy to understand that your comment is a lecture, not a question at all.

@David Lyon:

I didn't start this with a question. I started it with a logical conclusion: If Farsight believe this, then they don't believe in true freedom.

And yes, this is a lecture.

So, you want me to step out of the belief that it's wrong to own other people?

Nope, ain't happening.

"are the Individuals on the planet completely their own consciousness or are they part of the collective consciousness?"

They are individuals creating a collective consciousness based on either violence or freedom. At the moment, the collective consciousness created is based on violence.

"So what if the 'Good ET's" are one group that have a different idea on what freedom is than the "Bad ET's"?"

Of course. It's just that you are bad by definition if you want to own others.

Do you want to be the master of others?

@David Lyon:

"this Planet owns your consciousness"

So, the planet is either an ISBE, or it is a collective of ISBEs. This means that you believe in ISBEs owning other ISBEs. Which is called slavery. It doesn't matter whether a collective or one being owns another. It's slavery in both cases.

If the collective consciousness of a planet deems slavery to be a right, the logical result of this belief is called PRISON PLANET.

Which is exactly what we have today.

Please consider ->

@David Lyon:

I'm not forcing definitions on others, I'm just applying them.

Definition of slavery: Slavery is the ownership of a person as property, especially in regards to their labour.

You said: "the Planet owns your consciousness and your freedoms are limited to whatever the Planet says that you are allowed to do."

This means that you think the planet owns me as property.

"Whilst many people on Earth are definitely Slaves, there are many that are not."

But in your logic, the planet owns everybody on Earth, right? This means everybody on Earth is forced to do what the planet wants. How can you say that many are not slaves? They must obey the planet, right?

"Please consider"

The lady in that video is talking about Yaldabaoth, the so-called demiurge, as described in the Gnostic texts. In these texts, the demiurge is claimed to be the "creator of the world", whereas the term world is interpreted as "physical realm". In this belief system, the malevolent demiurge created all physicality, which makes all physical creation essentially a bad thing.

The truth is that the gnostic scriptures aren't the truth. It's just an interpretation, heavily influenced by eastern religions who also deem physicality to be a bad thing you have to escape. The problem with those interpretations is that they confuse the world (in the sense of universe) with a single planet.

Yaldabaoth was the creator of Earth as a prison planet. Think of a reptilian predator discovering a primitive planet and manipulating it to his liking. He created his own "hunting ground" where he can harvest souls. He believes that he owns Earth and its population.

I'm telling you with my "lecture" that it's not okay to own others.

You don't agree with my lecture, which means that you agree with the demiurge. Are you one of his house slaves? I mean, you even call yourself "Lyon" – Yaldabaoth usually is depicted as a lion-faced serpent.

@David Lyon:

So I was right: You have a problem with how I define freedom. You want freedom to include aggression.

This makes you either an animal that is not capable of understanding what aggression is, or a bad guy who wants to be violent.

See, you don't need aggression for survival.

Aggression is every attempt to enforce one’s will upon another outside of defense. Even animals kill other animals in order to survive, which makes it a form of defense (because animals – as well as most humans – don't know that ISBEs can't die). Killing out of defense is not violence.

But if you know that you don't need to kill others in order to survive, you killing others is a violation of freedom. Because it's not happening out of defense anymore. It's not necessary.

Do you believe that you need to kill others in order to survive?

I can share how I heard that quote, when listening to it live. That’s not to say I heard it correctly, but just my interpretation:

45:53] "It is the signature of an unresolved equation in consciousness itself. The universe – the whole universe it seems – still cannot decide who should own awareness: the master, or the sovereign soul. You know where we're heading with this: We believe the sovereign soul should be the one that owns consciousness."

I heard Courtney saying that there is a battle between more authoritarian/totalitarian forces and the more free will forces going on right now. And that even in the galaxy they haven’t figured out how to balance this competing value system in a way that doesn’t provoke conflict or war. And that farsight is on the free will or sovereign soul side, meaning that they want everyone ISBE to be a sovereign self and have free choice. Meaning that each ISBE owns itself (sovereign/free will) not that the “good ET’s” that Courtney is partnering with wants to own the ISBE’s themselves.

Anyway, that’s how I heard it. Peace be with you

Let's start with freedom...freedom is described by being sovereign and owning yourself which comes with being responsible for yourself and your actions. One cannot blame another for things they do or say, like Christians blame the devil when they do bad things or harm another. Being free means if you do harm another which is a violation of another's freedom or sovereignty then that is breaking the 'rule' of freedom.
On this prison planet, we have 'rules' but are secretly considered property, owned by beings that invaded and captured souls in which we are given 'liberty' (regulated freedom) and not allowed to leave. That is a violation of our sovereignty and ownership of any ISBE isn't right or good to me.
When an ISBE gives away it's sovereignty as in Leaders, rulers or guards, Kings, etc....they are no longer sovereign or free. If you consider yourself a sovereign, then you own yourself, no one can own you or rule over you. But you are also responsible if your actions violate another ISBE's freedom. You can't be part of a collective if you are sovereign, yes, we're all connected as in energy, but how we interact with others is to honor another's sovereignty and not give them rules and lead them. Sovereigns do not rule over others, or follow leaders. Do they need rules or regulations in order to interact with others? Nah, I think if you are a sovereign, you know that in order to be a sovereign, you won't rule over others, nor would you do anything that violates or harms another. You respect their space, their sovereignty and so it's a no brainer.
I didn't watch the last Farsight video yet. Not sure if I want to because the one before that was just not jiving with me. No one should 'own' another's awareness or consciousness. But two sovereigns can agree on a project or mission to work together as long as that doesn't give away their power to another that harms someone or a group.
By harm I mean taking away someone's ability to live their lives as they see fit, to be on a planet as long as you aren't harming someone or regulating another's ability to move or be free.
If one is violating the sovereignty of another, then the one who's being violated can surely defend itself as we have the power to do.
But being sovereign means you know that harming another's sovereignty is a violation and should never consider owning or trying to lead or say they are serving but actually leading and taking another's power away....a violation.
Is should always be by consent....
In this prison planet they say we consented...but what we have here is 'implied consent'. That is consent by manipulation and lies. To me that is not consent and a violation of our sovereignty. We don't need leaders or servants, we as sovereign should be able to decide rules over our own lives and not be tricked or trapped by covenants or decrees of ownership of our energy, our emotions or our lives.
So in otherwords....we aren't being treated as sovereigns, but ruled and used, abused and manipulated.
As for the good or bad ETs....
The bad ETs think they are the good guys....let that sink in, they see us as food, as energy, much like we see cattle or food here on this planet. This system is set up that way and we aren't on the top of the food chain. It's a simulation and the thing is it's a trap for our minds, and being ISBEs we do have the power to free ourselves. WE don't need good ETs or bad ETs but we've been conditioned to believe we don't have power over our own souls.
Am I looking for good ETs to save us? No.....do I know that we've been trapped here and memory wiped so many times and conditioned and programmed to believe we need rules and regulations and a leader to follow? That we need to be rescued? That is what this is...no diffrerent than religion, which has us believing in a savior, it's the savior program.
So if you believe you are sovereign, then no one can rule over you, imprison you, keep you here when you want to leave.
If we allowed technology to be implanted into our bodies, who do you think owns us then?
It's plato's cave....we don't believe we can free ourselves. We think we need a savior.
Yes, this place is a prison planet....
What I plan is a jail break...who needs to be rescued? What can own you if you take your power back and use it as a sovereign being...we have that power.
Good ETs, Bad ETs...that is the construct of duality....the game of 'good vs evil' construct this matrix game.
We are powerful beings and that's the last thing they want us to know.
Who cares what Farsight says....I'd still like to know if Courtney agreed to have a hybrid child, if he did then why? If not, then we got a problem, and everything that they have done with remote viewings and other projects could be compromised and these ETs are the greys that take over worlds by creating hybrids then introducing them to the parents and then they invade. Look into the grey agenda.
It's the carrot they dangle then pull away.
Harvey says: If disclosure didn't happen in February or March of this year, then they'd leave and wouldn't be back because then the gooberment is going to clamp down on the internet and censor anything to do with UFOs etc. I know they try to erase history and are trying to reset civilization like has been done before. Their goal is Agenda 2030 and to have A.I. governing cities, 15 minute cities with this A.I. To have A.I.allies....that is the purpose of this project with Farsight as he sees this agenda going on, and the transhumanism agenda.
Every since Farsight remote viewed CONvid, I've had my questions.
I wondered who paid for that viewing.....there never was a virus, you can't catch a virus, people need to realize that we've been bamboozled to the extent that we are lied to most all the time. They've been spraying chemicals in the air for decades, I noticed it but was called a conspiracy theorist, and they gaslight us constantly, programming us to be afraid and to 'trust' them they will free us.
If you are sovereign, being free is on you. You got to free yourself. Want to be sovereign, gotta start acting like it.
How about a jailbreak, not a rescue....no saviors, no good or bad, don't play the game of 'good vs evil'.

@Grant Eckhart:

"And that even in the galaxy they haven’t figured out how to balance this competing value system in a way that doesn’t provoke conflict or war."

Yes, because balancing a situation in which one side believes in aggression is not possible. It's the aggressor who is violating the balance, and the other side can't do anything about it but defend themselves.

"And that farsight is on the free will or sovereign soul side, meaning that they want everyone ISBE to be a sovereign self and have free choice."

Sovereignty is not the same as having free choice. See, it's all about the definitions. The words stand for concepts and therefore carry meaning. The bad ET strategy is to teach you wrong definitions, so you get the concepts wrong and therefore cannot understand how true freedom works.

Sovereignty is the conviction of standing above rulership. I already explained that. Rulership is authority over others. Standing above rulership means that you accept to be on eye level. That you don't have authority over the other person. A king or any other authoritarian ruler doesn't stand above rulership, because they implement rulership. An authoritarian ruler is enslaving others, because he acts as if the others are his property. A sovereign being wouldn't do that.

The rulers taught you that authoritarian rulers are sovereigns. They reversed the original meaning to confuse you.

It's the same with freedom. The rulers want to be free to rule over you. But this isn't true freedom. It's the freedom to own people. But in nature, the freedom to own others doesn't exist. If it was a natural freedom, enslaving other beings wouldn't require violence. But it does. And because of this, owning others also enslaves the slave owner. They can't move freely anymore, because they always have to keep an eye on the slaves. They have to act if the slaves want to break free. They start to fear the revenge of the slaves. And if the slaves accept the slavery, the slavers start to despise them for being that weak.

Owning other beings is not freedom. It's impossible.

True sovereignty means to not enslave others. True freedom means to not enslave others.

Maybe the ETs Farsight is in contact with understand that. But Courtney obviously doesn't understand it. And this makes me question the ETs as well, because... why haven't they told him?

@Nancy:

"It's plato's cave....we don't believe we can free ourselves. We think we need a savior."

It's a bit more complicated, because it's totally possible to walk into a trap without you being at fault. Imagine you go for a walk in the woods and step into a hidden bear trap. There should be no bear trap there, but bad people don't care. So, what do you do? Of course you would try to free yourself, but it could be impossible. I wouldn't mind a savior in that situation.

See, there's a law of attraction. And no, it doesn't work like how they are telling you how it works.

Do you know the saying "God helps those who help themselves"? If you are in that state of consciousness – not giving up – than you will attract the help you need. And because of this, the ETs Farsight is in contact with could be the ones who will help us... if we help ourselves first. It's a valid possibility.

"How about a jailbreak, not a rescue..."

A jailbreak means to stop paying the government, so they can't use our own money against us. Just think it through: The bad ETs who are running the planet as a prison need prison guards. The prison guards are the police and military who are blindly following orders. Now imagine the prison guards not getting paid anymore – instead, the people pay their own police and military, but with the purpose of protecting property without following orders from above.

Unfortunately, most people still believe in following orders and paying the prison guards, so the jailbreak ain't happening.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/70935-morality-disclosure

I think we agree here. Precise definitions of what sovereign mean and free choice mean are important. I wonder if “balancing the equation” language that courtney used is what is setting this off since it has been used to support things like eugenics and even the final solution. I heard it more charitably as a poor phrase to use and that what he means is that we all want everyone to have the freedom not to be controlled or lorded over by another sovereign or determined future (principle of alternative possibilities - pap). Perhaps his comment was intentional and inline with more sinister motives. I just still don’t hear it that way.

But in general, I listen to everyone, but my extention of trust is limited. I try to understand what people are saying and even “strong-man” their arguments, but hold much loosely.