In the recent Spotlight titled "PSI Education = Freedom on a Prison Planet", Courtney mentions how he thinks about 3I/Atlas.
I think what he is saying there is correct. If it is an alien spaceship, why does it fly in an unusual way? It looks like it wants to be seen, but at the same time, it's really hard to get pictures of it. NASA is in government shutdown, and we're still waiting for other space agencies to publish what they have.
Also, remote viewers around the globe saw many different things when looking at 3I/Atlas. And this makes me think: What if its purpose not only is to create speculation, but also to create false remote viewing data?
Group A sees X, group B sees Y, and Farsight would see Z. It doesn't matter what's true, all that matters is that different people see different things. Verification would become even more important.
What if verification is impossible BECAUSE it's a psyop?
And this led me to an interesting thought: Maybe Farsight isn't interested in remote viewing 3I/Atlas because their ET partners told them to not do it. Or at least didn't told them to do it. Because if they did, they would add to the overall confusion.
It almost feels like a statement: "We (the Farsight ETs) are not part of this psyop."
And here's another interesting thought: If they don't remote view a target that's not verifiable because it's a psyop, this could mean that all the others targets they already viewed will become verifiable in the future.
Examples:
- How the Pyramids or Kailasa Temple were built will be verified by reproducing the technology.
- Tower of Babel event will be verified because ETs have records of it.
- Lacerta will be verified because at some point in the future, we will talk to her.