So, in the latest Spotlight titled "PSI Education = Freedom on a Prison Planet", we are getting a new notion:

[54:10] "So, let's mention the broader topics: Freedom through perception. How does freedom come about through perception?

Freedom through perception

Now the real purpose of these lessons is not to teach people to remote view only. It's not just that. The real purpose of these lessons is to return perception to the people, because the people got perception ripped from them. And the real purpose of these lessons is to get that perception back to the people. So, when perception is free, friends, then truth is free. [...] And when truth is free, manipulation fails.

So, the ability to see directly across distance, across time, even across dimension – that is the antidote to control systems that depend on ignorance. So, when control systems are depending on you remaining ignorant, the control systems can't work anymore. So, these instructional transcripts are the blueprints of basically liberation. They reestablish that individual's right to know through direct experience, not through permission. Not through hypnotic control, where you look at the podcast, or the TV news, or whatever you're looking at, and wait for the president to tell you what is real or not real."

Okay, this sounds great. But I have a question now:

Farsight follows their own instructions, right? So, if that's the case, then how is it possible that Farsight, when remote viewing the death of Jeffrey Epstein, got it wrong the first time, and only right when a third party (the ETs) assisted in the second attempt?

The first time, you perceived directly, but got wrong results.

The second time, you didn't perceive directly anymore (because the ETs became an intermediary), but got correct results.

Why should I follow your instructions, when this direct perception still can yield wrong results?

Also, Farsight viewers obviously didn't recognize that their perception was wrong while doing their sessions. As far as I'm concerned, this means that the recognition of manipulation is not part of the instructions.

How can we recognize when perception is being manipulated?

The point is we can never know for sure unless we know from within, you know, when you know that you know but don't know how you know....you feel it.
But as far as that is concerned Jeffrey Epstein faked his death, was into cloning and all sorts of projects he could of cloned himself, allowed the clone to be suicided, and is still out there....the original.
That would make sense to me why they still hide his crimes and all he did. He had two islands and was friends with the man who did the movie 'The Island'. He had many homes and the one in New Mexico he did harvest eggs from girls he got involved in that business.
At the end of the day, we'll not know if what we perceive in those remote viewings are the truth. Especially if they are being manipulated by the ETs in the way to allow them to view it as they do have black magicians that can hide events or agendas from remote viewers.
Perhaps remote viewing if he created a clone of himself, and if that was the one in prison. We all know they suicided him and that's a no brainer but to see his body on TV which we never saw before, ever.....and at the time I thought it was odd they'd show that on national TV, but they were desperate for us to believe he was dead....that is why they allowed that. Most of the time we only see people with a sheet over their bodies or body bags....never a photo of a death body which is always blurred out for tv.
So hopefully the truth comes out eventually. I think he's still around, sipping coctails in Greenland. Ever wonder why they want greenland so bad?

@Nancy:

"The point is we can never know for sure unless we know from within"

But telepathy means that another person can manipulate you from within. An example was Harvey putting a face of a reptilian into Courtney's mind in one of the earlier conversations. Courtney said it looked real.

"you feel it"

Courtney didn't feel it. The Farsight viewers didn't feel it when viewing Epstein. There must be a requirement we have to meet in order to be able to feel it. And Farsight isn't talking about that at all. That's odd.

So, imagine the following situation:

The ETs disable the so-called "psi suppression field", resulting in humans having telepathic experiences in a way they're not used to. How will most humans react? Will they...

1. be cool with having other people in their heads, or

2. be scared and think they're losing their minds?

The question is to what extend can remote viewing be manipulated or give clear but incorrect results. I think we don't have a clear cut answer but I suspect that if can be influenced - up to a point. Take the crucifiction of Jesus. Farsight got that he was not crucified (2 times), while other people with telepathic abilities (but not blinded) have seen that he was and described all the details. I suspect they connected to a collective construct-reality of his story, created by the countless faithful over the centuries. Similarly, I suspect that a false reality can also be created mentally by advanced beings for example to mislead RVers. On the other hand, when seeing Yeme interact directly with a reptilian or other ETs while RVing, its hard to see how this cannot be a real interaction. Also, when beings try to hide things from viewers by blocking them, to me this is a clear sign that they are on something real and important, not a false mental image - but we still do not know all the details of how this works...

@Dimitrios Moschos:

How to target Jesus is a very good example of how perception can be influenced.

And why exact definitions matter.

In the minds of most people, the term "Jesus" is connected to an idea. It's a man who came to Earth to die for our sins, and for being willing to do so, was granted with resurrection from the dead. This story is emotionally powerful, because the truth of reincarnation is hidden in it, and people remember reincarnation on a subconscious level.

Here's the thing: Jesus wasn't able to come back from the dead because he's special. Instead, being able to come back from the dead is normal – because ISBEs can't die.

Think about it: The actual Jesus, the "special" being, didn't die on the cross. So there was nothing special happening.

In his place, a "normal" person has been crucified.

But why is the death of a normal person different from the death of a special person? Thousands have been crucified back in the day. Why is Jesus considered to be special?

So, when targeting Jesus, we can't actually target the idea of him being a special person in the sense of what people believe about him.

Now let's look at the term "Christ". It comes from Greek "khristos", which means "the anointed", which stems from the adjective "khriein", which means "to rub, anoint".

The original idea is not that there is only one Christ. The translation into messiah, who is a single person, is just an interpretation by people who want to spin the narrative for their own advantage.

Christ is a title that everybody can earn. It describes a certain type of consciousness – a sovereign being that is living in harmony with natural law.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/76234-understanding-jesus

So, can we remote view Christ as if it's one person? No. Because there were – and are – many Christs.

This means that when remote viewing Jesus in an understanding of him being *the* Christ, connected to the idea that *the* Christ is the person who died for our sins, viewers will get the person who died on the cross for the sin of being sacrificed by his brother (who watched from the distance).

Remote viewing the "actual historical figure of Yeshua Ben Yosef, the person currently and popularly known as Jesus", will lead viewers to the person who was watching from the distance.

So, the problem is not that Farsight or others targeted Jesus in the wrong way – the actual problem is that there is no Jesus Christ in the sense of a messiah, which is what most people believe.

But there are many people who died for our sins, which all goes back to the sin of Cain who betrayed his brother, which in turn stems from the original sin of their father (not God) who preferred Abel and rejected Cain.

@Dimitrios Moschos:

"First, I am from Greece, so no need to clarify Greek words"

You are not the only one who is reading this. This is a forum, not a conversation between two people.

"you suggested that we can remote view Jesus Christ with an understanding that he died in the cross"

Correct.

"Then, in this post, [...] you changed your narrative completely, telling us that this cannot be done as Christ is an idea, not a specific person, many Christs might exist etc."

You misunderstood what I was saying. If you view Jesus with the understanding that there's only one Christ, and that Christ is Jesus, then you will get the guy who died on the cross. Not because it's a cultural or mental construct, but because there actually died a person on the cross. The sacrifice that people attach to Jesus was real. But if you view Christ in the understanding that Christ is a title, you will get a different result.

"you failed to provide a clear worded target that could accomplish that"

The wording is not that important. The consciousness of the tasker determines where the viewer is going. Farsight managed to view the guy who didn't die on the cross, because Courtney, when writing the target, was open to the possibility that Jesus didn't die on the cross. That's why Courtney wrote "regardless of any culturally accepted historical view or interpretation". A tasker who believes in the cultural interpretation would not only write it differently, but would subconsciously target the guy on the cross.

Let me explain it more clearly why this works. It's a theory of mine, so take it with a grain of salt:

Yes, there was more than one Jesus.

Farsight supports the idea that the ETs sent a guy (Jesus) to start a new religion as a countermeasure against established religions. The idea was to implement an understanding of sovereignty within the population. The goal was, of course, to enable people to not fall for the death traps.

They started to implement their plan by touring through the country and performing miracles. The purpose was to attract people to create a movement, a rebellion, against the established authorities. But the other side anticipated this development and introduced their own Jesus. They started their own controlled opposition.

The "Jesus and the Crucifixion" project targets the historical figure of Yeshua Ben Yosef. The "Young Jesus" doesn't mention this name. It seems like Courtney assumes that Yeshua Ben Yosef and the young Jesus are the same person. But is that even true?

As far as I'm concerned, Yeshua Ben Yosef was the guy who had been introduced as controlled opposition. He implemented the plan of "God's son" dying on the cross. But of course he didn't want to sacrifice himself, that's why he used a patsy instead. That patsy looked like him. I have a feeling that the patsy was his brother, who also performed the role of Jesus, but I could be wrong.

"So, why did you suggest that Farsight should do a Resurrection project in your initial post?"

Because the resurrection was a staged event: The patsy was buried, and the fake Jesus – the one who didn't die on the cross – came back. This was all planned by the bad guys to start their own religion. In contrast to the initial plan of the good guys, the religion implemented by the bad guys made Jesus the "Son of God" (which is always the bad guys' religion). They made him a special person that people can worship. The knowledge about reincarnation and the idea that everybody is a sovereign went out the window.

That's why there were so many Christian sects in the first century. It was a war. The bad guys won when emperor Constantine the Great adopted Christianity – which cemented the belief and church of the bad guys.