Courtney keeps repeating again and again that Farsight collects remote viewing data under "totally blind conditions".

At the same time, Farsight is getting help from ETs who intervene somehow with the remote viewing process.

This means that the requirement of totally blind conditions is at issue.

In order to assess whether the requirement of totally blind conditions has been fulfilled, we need proof that the ETs who intervene with the remote viewing process are blind to the target as well.

Also, Farsight is using so-called "instrumented" protocols. Courtney explains it like this: The monitor is watching the remote viewing session live from another room and can interact with the viewer directly.

In consideration of the viewer's ability to interact telepathically, how do we know that there's no telepathic connection between the viewer and the monitor while doing the session? Can a remote viewing still considered to be "totally blind" if telepathy is a thing?

As far as I'm concerned, the statement that the data is collected under totally blind conditions still is an unproven claim.

Not really, it's totally blind to the RV'er.
There are black magicians that put an energy blanket around certain events and subjects so no one can remote view it and find out the truth.
Of course being the ETs could project what they want the remote viewers to see, that part might be subject to scrutiny to me if they have an agenda.
The fact that they can cover up their deeds via black magicians is just that, how would we know either way that we are getting the truth and how would we know if the 'good ETs' are just removing the black magician cover and revealing the truth....we don't know.
We should be able to remote view everything, but this is a technology and we are in a technological prison mind trap.
Either way, I believe that hopefully we find out the truth, these 'good ETs' are good and want us to know the truth, or not trusting them explicitly which I am always sceptical of any ETs. Certainly if they can communicate with us and aren't captured by bad ETs, then they could also free humanity, but again, that is us looking for a savior. We are our own saviors. We need to be sovereign and not allow our consent to be given for some secret agenda....not again.

@Nancy:

"Of course being the ETs could project what they want the remote viewers to see"

So, remote viewing blind doesn't change the possibility of getting manipulated and therefore incorrect data.

Keymaker shared this video:

The last chapter of that video starts with the question what blind means and what the actual purpose is (timestamp 1:08:32).

Takeaway: It's not at all a guarantee that the collected data will be correct. But Courtney is trying to sell "totally blind conditions" as the only necessary requirement to get "pristine data". As far as I'm concerned, this is not just wrong, it's also dangerous.