The IS-BE seems less like an object anchored in space-time and more like a cloud of data points, where each point is aware of its other associated points so that if any of it should separate, the cloud will know it's completion or incompletion.

We cannot really "turn evil" but we can be fractured or made whole. And deep down we will feel the fracture. Whether we can act on self repair nobly is another story. And an "evil empire" is one who's ideals persist only by fragmented IS-BEs, not whole.

We are each a unique "cloud"

This is my impression based on the various remote viewing sessions that have peered into IS-BEs on their own accord.

"We cannot really 'turn evil' but we can be fractured or made whole."

This is essentially true, but needs a little bit more clarification:

Evil and Good aren't states an ISBE can be in. It's not that the ISBE "turns evil" and then has a red circle around it like the enemies in RPG video games. It doesn't work like that.

Evil and Good only exist as decisions. They are singular events, not states of existence. Evil means that the decision results in unnecessary harm for another being. Good means that the decision does not result in unnecessary harm for another being.

This leads to the question: When is harm necessary?

To understand this, we need to know that an ISBE is the legitimate owner of itself and its "cloud". There's the singularity at the core, and things gathered around that singularity, which are called "property". Memory is one form of property. The physical body is another form of property.

The ISBE can be reduced to its core – the singularity – without losing itself. But losing property comes with negative effects.

Evil just means to steal property. Like wiping memories, or killing a body.

Harm becomes necessary when an ISBE has to use force to defend itself against the theft if its property.

Becoming whole means to get your property back.