We think of ET wars as either big space lazers or mental universe manipulation or whatever. But what about careful political controls?
Once you look at the legal system which in practical terms enslaved us, you see this would be very hard for someone to think up unless they had lifetimes to go over it. They could be using ancient playbooks from old scenarios, which would explain why if their plan seemed very dependent on a schedule.
But here's what I think our side has been pondering. Explosive technology has reached a point where no one is really thinks about what gets bigger but what gets better. More refined, decisive. Can you take down a whole cluster of explosives with a web of plumbing explosives? Can you get an explosive not to go big but to go deep?
We know in modern day that defense is underground. The best shield is the one you don't have to build. You just get kilometers of dirt and rock between you and the enemy reach. it's pretty good defence. And our attempting enslavers would already know this well in advance. They don't go high. They go deep. We see ancient quarries all over the world.
So the counter-strategy? What can quickly excavate lots of dirt and rock? What can become a bunker-buster?
So. What if in a time when bunker-busters reach a certain plateau of their proficiency ... and in that moment the world breaks out in chaotic war.
What if the thousand bomb-built lakes in Vietnam was the precursor to a new kind of warfare? What if the goal is not nuclear warfare, but rather a push against nuclear warfare so separate that they do everything to destroy the underground facilities planning them. We all know anyone today wanting to go nuclear had better go underground. So the anti-nuclear strategy to intercept at point of origin, and first strike, is bunker-busting.
So we tear a bunch of holes .... but it's not the usual planned alien intervention. It's just human despair gone haywire.
Somewhere out there in the military there is likely a think tank tasked with answering only one question: how do we keep north America from getting nuked? And that think tank will do *anything* to it's aim. And what is one of its primary tools now? Bunker busting. And whom would inadvertently have an interest in helping them? Farsight's faction. Not because they care about "American primacy and it's geostrategic objectives" as Zbigniew Broginsky put it. But because they know that desire will inadvertently serve their aim for mass disclosure.
The moral of the story: fuel it.
*Fuel the desperation for American primacy, not because we care about American primacy, but because there's is the fulcrum point.
*Fuel the fear of nuclear holocaust. Not because it's the biggest thing out there to be afraid of but because it is still a *very bad thing* and because it's going with the political grain.
*Fuel the push for uncovering nuclear proliferation. Not because we think only "bad" countries or "good" countries do nuclear proliferation (at this stage, all UN "nations" are bad, sorry) but because it's going with the political grain. The politicians and the public tend to agree on the prevention of nuclear proliferation : especially the ones trying to maintain the double standard.
*Fuel the push for eliminating rogue nuclear proliferation. Not because those rogues are necessarily any worse than anyone out there, but because you're going with the political grain.
*Fuel the push for bunker-busters against nuclear proliferation because it's going with the political grain. It's a good strategy as far as first strike threat elimination , but it's not because we think those people are the *real* threat.
*It's because a giant war trying to dig up all the rogue nukes inadvertently becomes a giant war making holes revealing entire cities.
*AND: fuel the Infowars against censorship. Yes including all the dark stuff out there. Not because we want to help bad people get bad digital media, but because the above ground psychological triggers and pervert aims are a casualty of the strategy. Expose everything both literally and digitally. That is the strategy.