I'm going to use new agey lingo I think Farsight doesn't really subscribe to. But I'll give it specifics and then attach whatever words and phrases you want.

It seems to me that a storm arrives when starseeds are born. It may seem trivial but I like to know the measurable patterns of what's really happening.

Ok so Starseeds here is defined as humans incarnating on Earth just like us, but they retain more memories because they weren't processed through the death traps. Now this could be for good or evil. Not all starseeds work toward our liberation.

Well Courtney explains several times that Brother John is *exactly* what happens. It's not a creative abridgment, it's like a template: "that's how starseeds are."

Well brother John was born in an unusual storm. They made a point of it in the movie.

Was Courtney born in an unusual storm?

Was Aziz born in an unusual storm?

Help me learn if you can. I just find it interesting to know.

Thanks for the definition. I wasn’t sure what that was. Any different than a flame seed?

Also, I missed the brother John reference. Who’s that?

Brother John is an old movie that Courtney and Yeme referenced. Courtney has said (or been told) that everything in the movie is the truth about how the whole thing works. I figure just google for a description of the movie.

"...Starseeds here is defined as humans incarnating on Earth just like us, but they retain more memories because they weren't processed through the death traps."

Which begs the following questions:

1. If it's true they weren't processed, why is that in the first place? Is there a loophole?

2. If it's true they weren't processed, why don't they remember everything?

3. Courtney told that story how upset Aziz was with him because he "forgot everything". Does this mean Courtney has been processed by the amnesia machine?

4. Aziz seems to also have forgot "everything" when he was born. Does this mean Aziz has been processed by the amnesia machine?

5. If Courtney and Aziz have been processed, does this mean there is no loophole?

6. If there is no loophole, why do so-called starseeds remember more than others?

And my favorite question:

7. Is the amnesia machine the only plausible explanation for the memory loss?

We know that the vast majority of us born here on Earth lose (by whatever process) most or all of our past memories when we are born into our physical bodies. Especially those who have been reincarnated here repeatedly.

Then there are those quixotic ETs who volunteer for an "Earth mission" and who, on their first tour here, will hopefully retain some memory of what they were supposed to do here,

@Jackie:

You are implying that, when going through the amnesia machine the first time, it's less effective and therefore resulting in losing less memory. That's a valid possibility that opens up the possibility that all ISBEs who come here go through the amnesia machine (meaning there's no loophole, except for your own resilience).

Interestingly, there seems to be nobody – as far as we know – who remembers everything.

On the other hand: If someone did remember everything, how could that person prove this to us? We can't verify the claims. We can remote view them, but that's not proof.

@Tazz:

I thought about the storm. My intuition tells me it's a metaphor to visualize that the starseed is a force that needs to be contained. Like a fight between the ISBE and the amnesia system that happens because actually, nobody goes undetected.

Right now, the Matrix movies come to my mind, where the real world (the machine world) is shrouded in stormy clouds. In the movies, it's a metaphor for the supression of humanity as well as nature not being in balance. A nice detail is that the machines can't cross the storm (because they are also prisoners). This means that beings who can cross the storm are beings who are stronger than the prison.

The Matrix movies do a great job depicting the symbolism.

They could require a high powered electromagnetic field to get the IS-BE to "beam" to the human host. But albeit, sounds out there by shear lack of retained evidence.