So, I was pondering this question for quite some time now, because being a "mentalic" should mean to be able to remote view completely on your own, independent of another mind.

Why is this individual independence important? Because, if it works, it eliminates the possibility that the tasker is influencing the remote viewing with his biases and assumptions. For example, we can't be sure whether Farsight sees the truth or just what Courtney believes to be the truth – at least when it comes to non-verifiable targets.

So, this approach aims at minimizing – and ideally getting rid of – the biases that affect the viewing negatively.

But how can we achieve this? The viewer must be blind to the target, right?

Well, what if that's not true? We have to ask: What is the psychological effect of being blind to the target?

In short: Getting data while being blind to the target alters the intention of the viewer. When viewing blind, the viewer has to be open to the possibility of getting data he doesn't approve of. In a sense, not knowing the target absolves the viewer from the responsibility of choosing truth over bias willfully.

But the viewers already proved that they can choose truth over bias by willfully adhering to the protocol. For example, the natural ability of pattern recognition leads to so-called "deductions", and the viewer is able to put deductions aside so they don't contaminate the session data. This is a free will choice.

So, how could a remote viewing without a tasker look like? How do we set the intention?

Step 1 – Everything is Connected

The first step we already know is the recognition that you are an ISBE that is connected with everything independent of time and space. Nothing is out of your reach, because separation is just an illusion of the physical world.

Step 2 – Dissolving Time

Time in itself is a concept of separation, and therefore an illusion. This doesn't mean that time doesn't exist, it means that time isn't an insurmountable barrier for your mind. You are not only connected to everything in the present, but also in the past and future.

Step 3 – The Power of Immortality

You are an ISBE, an immortal spiritual being. Think about that. Think of your spiritual life as a journey. Does this journey ever end when you are immortal? Not really, right? And this means something important: There is a future version of you that knows stuff you don't know now. It doesn't matter where in the future this version of you is. Your future version can be one day in the future or 100 million years. Do you see what this means?

Step 4 – Connect with Yourself

Let's say, for example, you want to know whether the death traps on Earth will be disassembled one day. You don't know when this happens, and you don't know how it happens. But there must be a future version of you that knows the truth about it, because from the point of view of your future self, it happened in the past. Now intend to connect to that future version of yourself. Just ask for the answer.

Important: Your future self is not obliged to give you the correct answer. There could be a reason why your future self wouldn't want to tell you, or would even lie to you. But here's the thing: Because it's you in the future, you can be certain that whatever you will get, it won't be to your detriment.

For example, of you're asking something on the basis of an assumption that's not true, your future self would know that your assumption is false. But how could your future self tell you without causing harm?

Step 5 – Be humble

Acknowledge that your future self is wiser than you. This is the point where you get to having the right intention. You must be open for the possibility of being wrong. You must be open to not getting the answer you want, or any answer at all.

Regarding the protocol, I suggest that you and your future self agree upon a symbolic language. For example, I had the idea that my future self will respond with an image of a full glass of water whenever the correct answer would be in conflict with what I think I know today. The water represents my wrong assumptions. Getting this image means: Empty the glass first.

If I get an image of a partially filled glass, the amount shows me how much of my present knowledge is wrong. And if I get an image of an empty glass, it means I'm ready to receive the correct answer.

However, if I get a different image, like an empty hand, it means I am not able to understand the correct answer yet.

What do you think about this concept?

Who's willing to test it, and compare the results with classic remote viewing?

I suggest that you just follow the Farsight remote-viewing process and exercises exactly first.

Then after that, with a lot of experience, go and develop what works for you best.

That's how most of the remote-viewers do things.

Front loading is nothing terrible to experiment with. Children have psychic experiences with front loading all the time. I've seen it.

I guess we're talking about two things. (a) having psychic experiences (mentalics) that you know to be true subjectively. (You have evidence for yourself via first hand experience) VS psychic experiences that you can defend objectively. (It's hard for even outsiders to disprove). If we focus only on appeasing the staunch pseudo skeptical we will fall prey to their ridiculous games. So it's worth trying a little of both.

The 5 points are encouraging. I would think of them as a mindset for many applications

Lot's of people can do it.

But it isn't really "formal" remote-viewing that has repeatable outcomes and is therefore harder to verify.

@David Lyon:

"If you have a hypothesis, then you need to take responsibility and work through it yourself."

I do.

"Your claim is that Remote-Viewing is hypothetical."

That's not my claim.

"But it isn't really 'formal' remote-viewing that has repeatable outcomes and is therefore harder to verify."

So your claim is that only "formal" remote viewing has repeatable outcomes. That's the point of me asking people to test my hypothesis: To investigate whether the outcomes of doing it differently would be repeatable.