I fully accept the debate arising for Farsight's MOCAP performance -
"It's all fake, do they expect us to believe any of it?"
"Show some appreciation, they barely have any staff as it is"
Whatever I don't care. Here's what I want to know.
Will the remote viewers be involved in the final cuts of the cgi ? Will it be sort of like picking and choosing with a potato head doll?
For example - Yeme does a viewing. And someone pops up cgi programs for Yeme to review. And Yeme can say: "no the skin was lighter. No his hair was more curly. Yes there was a window there but a little more to the right"
In other words are we arriving at a point where , scientifically, we try to remain as close to the remote viewers perceptions as much as possible *before the reveal* using cgi?
I would love to move away from any cgi that animated based on prompts, but is cut after the session is revealed and not really the viewer's depiction but rather a rendition based on their paper session.