In the latest Spotlight called "The Mystery of Disclosure", Courtney tells a story about how his laptop was stolen. He then comes to an interesting conclusion why the theft happened:

[5:57] "I just want you to show how the ETs sort of manipulate us to get us to do the right thing without forcibly trying to control us."

This doesn't make sense, because free will ETs wouldn't do that.

Let's assume they did that and summarize:

The ETs manipulate the situaton in a way such that some strangers violate property (damage the car), and steal property (take the laptop). The ETs then somehow manipulate Courtney to make him go to the right store and buy a laptop that's called "predator".

Let me say it like Candace Owens would say it: This doesn't vibe with me.

What free will people would do:

If the laptop Courtney is using doesn't have the right hardware to do the necessary things, free will people would approach Courtney and, well... tell him. They would make the case why the laptop needs to be replaced and try to convince him without forcing him.

And if Courtney is too stubborn to listen to good advice, well, then free will people would let him make his own mistakes and figure it out on his own. Which is exactly what he claims they are doing already.

There's absolutely no need to manipulate a situation to make a theft happen, and then legitimize the theft afterwards by saying: It was necessary. Bad people do that.

I just don't get Farsight.

If they were remote viewers whom discovered ways to get AI to remote view, and film UFOs - I would feel completely on board. Even if they don't understand why it works. The predictions, yes with actual dates, have actually been effective.

I didn't need a space group to tell me it's a prison. It's obviously a prison.

This narrative with the beach exercises and empty lawn chairs and invisible board members and long back history. And now the mocab "ship visits" and bathroom explanation and "free will golden theft beyond coincidence"

I'm tired with all of it.

And yet another explanation about why they charge money. Yoooo!!! I get it! You have lights to turn on and stomachs to feed, you need cash I get it, yes paywall cash cash, need cash. Ok!!! I ... heard ... it ... the first time. Doesn't explain all the other weird stuff.

Again. I just don't get it. I don't know.

@Tazz:

As you know, I think in possibilities. But I don't write how I think on the forums, because language is so limiting. Most of the time I write as if one possibility is true, and the reason is simple: I'm playing with the possibility. This not only leads to new ideas, the feedback I'm getting also contributes to the forming bigger picture.

The title of this thread is "Farsight doesn't work with free will ETs", but it should be something like this:

If the story Courtney told in the latest Spotlight is true, than it is highly unlikely that Farsight is working with free will ETs.

So, Courtney obviously is the limiting factor when it comes to interpreting the ETs. It's totally possible that what he told us is false. It's possible that the laptop simply was stolen for no big reason, and it has nothing to do with the ETs.

But the way how Courtney interprets it shows us something important: He believes in fate.

➡️ https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/fate-vs-destiny-meaning-use

By definition, fate is those outside forces establishing the preordained path of your life despite what you do. Given its definition, it should come as no surprise "fate" comes from the Latin, fatum, meaning "has been spoken".

Fate is outside of your control. However, you can shape destiny with your choices. Why? Because destiny is your future. Coming from the Latin term destinare, which means "intended" or "firmly established", destiny hasn’t already been determined. Therefore, the changes that you make will affect your destiny in life.

Here's the thing: Courtney's belief in fate is plausible, because he is being manipulated by outside forces. He told us that even when he was a child, the ETs were already there. This means something profound: He doesn't feel like he has power over his own life. In a way, he is a pawn of the ETs.

This doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad thing. If he came here voluntarily, fully aware that he would have to live a life as a pawn of higher forces, there is no problem. The ETs need someone who is willing to do what needs to be done in spite of memory loss. So, using a person who believes in fate is the easiest way to get things done. This way, you prevent unnecessary debate.

But: The belief in fate is what the bad ETs use as well, because bad people don't want to debate either.

At this point, I'm contemplating the probability of free will ETs using the belief in fate as a means to implement their plans. So, we have to look at what the ETs are actually doing. How do they use their power over Courtney? Do they abuse it?

And here comes the motivation of the ETs into the picture. They don't do what they do out of love – they do it because they fear a possible future outcome. Fear is the opposite of love. Most people are willing to do evil things out of fear, resulting in a "the end justifies the means" mindset.

It's a slippery slope, because a fearful mindset can be exploited by evil people.

So, we have to measure the ETs against their own values. Do they respect free will, which allegedly is their highest value?

And this leads us back to Courtney's story: If it's true, the ETs are willing to justify theft in order to get what they want, which would show us that their fear of humanity is stronger than their own belief in free will.

I recommend to openly talk about this topic in a board meeting.

Ok. Farsight.

Let me give you a list of things you don't need to defend or explain in my eyes. These things have been sufficiently resolved either through just process of analysis or because yes you explained it plenty of times in enough ways, you just don't have to touch that base anymore. In fact if you continue on this list of answers but ignore the other list than I'm going to assume it's deliberately ignoring the hard questions.

*Why you need money.

Yes. We get it. We all need money. We need some kind of resource and although the "money" we usually talk about is actually a legalese trap, I get it, that's the prison we tend to be stuck in, so you need it. Just because you've had some interesting experiences with aliens doesn't mean you're carte blanche protected. People who analyze crop circles (Like Lucy Pringle and Eltjo H. Hasselhoff) have described incredible strange experiences. That doesn't mean they have endless food, protection from all weirdos, or even from the earth prison system. They just see anomalies and interpret them and Farsight is no exception. Yes. You need money. It's not a problem with the paywall and stuff.

*The big ships

People wanted to see "big ships." I get it, you already predicted the "drones," that was an incredible feat. Whomever is whining they didn't get big ships, it's long gone. In fact I don't think there was a lot of mention about it at all in the forum so really I don't even see it being a thing. It's ok, no big ships, we don't care.

*The Heaven's Gate and the picture scandal.

I get that there was a smear campaign. What doesn't get talked about is how there seemed to be a deliberate plot to torture the shit out of Birdie. I saw from her interview, the kinds of threats and comments she was getting. In fact I'm now pretty convinced there was probably a whole psychological thread of interventions to destroy lives and so on. But my main point is you don't have to convince anyone that the smear campaign was evil and the whole stupid picture dispute was garbage.

ok. now onto the stuff that *does* need explaining in my eyes

*Fanatical freewillism *AND* weird interventions. *AND* abstaining because of meaningless contracts.

Each one of those above 3 elements suffices just fine on its own. "We're about free will, but we just can't get to you." / "We intervene in strange ways because we see fulcrum points in the timeline that doens't always show for everyone" / "We don't intervene on these things, because the political situation is too sticky". The problem is you are putting all of these together and they don't make any sense together. If you just say the political situation is complicated and the help is tied into it, but here's how to remote view here's how to film UFOs here's how to get AI to remote view , without all this purile nonsense you would be so completely fine. Every time you push this freewillism box you turn the whole thing into a philosophically indefensible paradox nightmare. The whole thing becomes *nonsensical.*

In my eyes the best course of action is to drop the freewillism repetition. They're trying to fee people out of a prison and liberties are a high societal priority, that's enough. You still leave room for things like arrests, like military cloaking, like not recognizing contracts by a slave society, or like leaving harmful matters be because of the dangers of intervention. Every time you say "fanatical free will" you wreck this concept with a little more of the same nonsensical paradox. It's unfortunate but it is so very unhelpful to take that road.

*Ships *AND* bodies*

You can't put bodies on ships because of all the problems with bodies. They're too messy and stuff. That was a really weird unnecessary explanation. I've heard the following explanations that suffice. they exist in a phase of matter intangible to our own so you can't physically go without some high technology, and/or the prison makes it too damn hard anyways. But if you're going down that road, there's no need to CGI the hell out of it. Because you're best to let the audience settle with the fact that you're probably *never* going on the ships. Just tell the audience it's not happening, forget it. End of story. Just like I tell my child there's not candy today. Not "maybe before you go to bed, maybe a little sugar frosting on that strawberry, maybe let's eat a fruit and pretend it's candy." No. None. Not. Gone. Zero. Un. A-present.

Just remind the audience that , all else being equal , they're in a different phase. So they have ships and bunnies and fedora hats and duck ponds and you name it. It just all happens to be on a different phase that doesn't really engage with our own. So the exchange is almost always informational for now. And like . . . because of that, NO ONE IS SEEING ALIENS. NOT HAPPENING!

. . . you need to stop phrasing as "going on the ships." It's very cringe. Like don't say they're visiting you at the beach or they're sitting in your board meeting. Just tell people that remote viewing has lead you to have informational exchanges that have allowed you to make predictions and even develop technologies to better see UFOs.

Look you have people watching your interviews that have never seen a Farsight video, and they're following your claims of literal board meetings and so on, and they go on your channel and they see empty chairs and desks with just the staff. You are setting up an insane bust for yourself.

Think about it like this. All verbs in the Earth human lexicon are based on bodies *existing on our phase of matter* doing things like sitting and going and walking and eating. What you're describing isn't part of our lexicon. There is no one sitting at your board meeting. There is an informational exchange happening and you can monitor it. You go to the beach: There's no one sitting with you. There is an informational exchange happening and you are monitoring it. Nobody is going on a ship. There's an informational exchange happening and you are monitoring it.

"Just tell the audience it's not happening, forget it. End of story."

But the goal must be to have physical interaction with the ETs, so it can't be the end of the story. And this leads to the question: When will there be physical interaction? But from the viewpoint of the ETs, physical interaction first and foremost means hot war with the enemy, shooting at each other and all the nasty stuff. I totally get that they don't want to commit themselves to a specific date.

So, the purpose of the CGI stuff is not to replace physical interaction, it seems more like getting more attention as long as physical interaction is not possible yet.

Man, the more I think about it, the more I understand what a messy situation this is. Picture this: Their military is on stand by, ready to cut loose any moment. Every day they go to the social scientists and ask: "Now?" And the social scientists respond: "Nope, they aren't ready yet. We would win the war, but lose humanity."

I'm wondering: How does the CGI stuff help advancing the plan? And I come to only one conclusion: The purpose is to make people think about things they wouldn't think about on their own.

Maybe it's even an experiment for restoring memory, like, you forgot your past life, but when confronted with accurate imagery, you suddenly remember stuff. 🤔

As Tazz said, the main problem is how it's communicated. Here's an example from the Harvey Board Meeting:

[03:49] Courtney: "I'm gonna tell you now we're gonna be taking our human audience on the ships with us, so that you can actually see inside what's going on. So we're using AI art combined with MoCap to actually make that. So we don't tell you what's on the ships, we're gonna show you what's on the ships."

Using AI art and MoCap is a way of telling us what's on the ships. It's just CGI instead of words.

Even the so call "Good ET's" talk about "What Courtney likes to call them the bad guys", i agree with Tazz in the notion as soon as you put it in black and white terms it's over you break it, it automatically creates a separation from everybody else, "my version of the story is correct and no one elses" probably whrite But it only creates separation from every other community in a time we need more communion from every one, just like saying "these remote viewers are the best their is in the world", i also agree with this, even knowing many had help from the ET's in their sessions in order to bypass some filters from "the bad ET's", and also, i still didn't came across to any other remote viewer like Farsight has ( and that's my opinion) and i understand you're selling your fish but people are not stupid and automatically creates rejection from the audience.... Humbleness i believe you guys talked about this in the last board meeting.
FFG (Into the Rabbit Hole) crew have been doing some of the Farsight Projects to see what they get in their data for comparison reasons and probably more i believe, i even exchanged a few sentences with one that was directing the target reveal session for everyone, i said - " uau amazing, it's great that you guys are focusing in some of the Farsight data sessions and claims, we need more of this, it's great to see that you guys are also starting to be aware of Farsight narrative through everyone's data, it would be great to everyone coming together Farsight FFG and so on.." - his response " Appreciate that, exploring different angles and meeting somewhere in the middle❤️" .. and this is it! of course there is a lot more going on to all of this but we need to give room to everyone to be in a space where they feel it's ok " ok we are all humans in this planet apparently fighting the same shit let's do something about it "
So for me i agree more with Aziz statement when it comes to bad and good et's narrative that way we leave room for in our free will to decide and pick a side!

In the end - any of us that remote view or have remote viewed know its very real

There are easier and harder timelines.

Courtney is right to mention coercion.

The Universe has a structure, and without getting into details there is always higher Management until there isn't. And we are not there yet.

So 'Higher level Managers' say X and Y needs to be done, it's just an opinion. But probably best to follow it if you like that chain of command.

The good thing is he isn't getting zapped for making a comment. And it's obvious that he is part of some sort of group dynamic that is working on improving things for a large number of people.