Manuel wrote:

> I do remote view. But I can't test certain things because of the lack of a tasker setting
> respective targets. So I decided to become the tasker in order to test it. Unfortunately,
> there's not much participation. Nobody participated in the counting exercise so far.

People can do it, but you have to be prepared to pay going rates for having topics
remote-viewed.

Typically the price for remote-viewing is around $USD500 for a session.

All the Farsight Remote-Viewers are paid, as are those on Future Forecasting Group.

This is because remote-viewing is mentally and physically draining to enter that particular mental state and do the session.

If you make a reasonable offer for the work that is being done in line with Community 'normals' then I am sure that you would have better luck.

I also don't mind doing remote-viewing for less on the forum to keep the momentum growing.

If you want me to do it for less than others: https://buymeacoffee.com/DavidLyon.Producer

Keep in mind some years ago, I actually requested that Farsight remote-view StoneHenge, and guess what, Courtney actually did have his team do it. They even published the video.

Also, counting is like Kindergarten standard in Reality Consciousness but harder in remote-viewing. If you want, I can assign you some counting Targets so you can remote-view them.

I really think you would be using your time better if you tried some of the Farsight Practice targets.

@David Lyon:

"Typically the price for remote-viewing is around $USD500 for a session."

The goal is to unlock remote viewing as a normal capability of perception. Everyone can do it. This means we should get away from the elitist mindset. Remote viewing is not for making money.

I published targets for people to exercise, and for me to learn how to set targets.

"I really think you would be using your time better if you tried some of the Farsight Practice targets."

You keep insinuating that I don't practice remote viewing. Why?

Manuel wrote:

> You keep insinuating that I don't practice remote viewing. Why?

The title of your post is "Farsight is lying"

That isn't very respectful

> The goal is to unlock remote viewing as a normal capability of perception. Everyone can do it. This
> means we should get away from the elitist mindset.

Publish your remote-viewing results.

> Remote viewing is not for making money.

That isn't respectful to the Farsight Team that do.

Also, Courtney himself said that it was ok. He once said that people would be out there doing paid remote-viewings for people, as I do: https://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/wolli-creek/alternative-therapies/remote-viewing-investigations/1339387394

You never miss an opportunity to chip away at the Farsight momentum, from what I have observed.

David, Well if people are paying $500 for a remote viewing session, they are crazy or just have a lot of money to throw away. Sure, I could see someone trying to find a missing person, or solve a crime that was personal to them, or maybe even pay that much to find a pet. But for just everyday tasking, I doubt very many would pay that.

As far as Manuel saying Farsight is lying, yes it may be a bit harsh. I probably wouldn't have used those words. But he is not wrong. When things are added to a session over and over in different sessions at least that I can point out in the last five months, then I suppose it is a form of lying. It is leading people to believe things that were not in the session.

I can't even tell you how many times I have seen things and bit my tongue. But then it just started getting to be too much, so I started voicing my concerns. Now I feel people are being deceived if they have no intention on fixing it once it is pointed out. And I have not been holding back in my recent posts because I have hoped they would do what is right for the authenticity of the science.

As for Remote Viewing being 100% telepathy, I think there could be some of that, but I have seen too many double blind sessions to believe that is the case. And then there are cases that have purposely been front loaded like a missing person case Daz's group solved for the police. They admitted they would not have found the girl on their own had it not been for his remote viewing. Is it possible he tapped into the mind of the killer with telepathy, sure I suppose it is. I did not see the details of that session, so I can't say for sure.

@David Lyon:

"Manuel wrote: > You keep insinuating that I don't practice remote viewing. Why?

The title of your post is 'Farsight is lying'

That isn't very respectful"

So... you actually don't have an argument, but call me something in order to be disrespectful in return.

Yes, me calling Farsight liars is disrespectful. Because respect needs to be earned with adherence to truth. I have pointed out so much inconsistencies on these forums and per email, but Farsight chooses ignorance. This behavior proves that they adhere to a narrative, instead of wanting to know the truth like genuine scientists.

500 won't get you much. If you look at professional grade remote viewers (ones with documented success via missing people, crimes, etc.) Your most likely paying 500 for project manager alone minimally, then you need minimum 2 remote viewers and sometimes an analyst unless the project manager does that. Corporations, law enforcement, etc. they pay between 2-5k for actual project. One little session by one remote viewer will tell you very little. Remote viewing is expensive unless you know someone. If you're getting a project done for 500 then most likely it's not that good. Look to organizations like Lori Williams or Lyn Buchanan's website and you can be directed to this. But if you're looking for esoteric non verifiable information, very few can do this, and we still don't no how accurate it is because it's non verifiable and it's really not taken credible in the remote viewing industry. You don't see IRVA and other organization recommending farsight.

sorry im not getting it! of course the task is created by the tasker in his mind, the question is are the rvers seeing based with bias or there is room for the actual purpose of the target to see the truth?! Courtney also stated that in the video, that many times he had bias towards a target and he actually got a different result that he believe in the first place.. something that also occur many times with Dick and Daz when creating targets!
I believe there is also a video where Daz talks about that process of him imagining something and make the viewers perceive what he invented although that image that he created apparently is part of his memory, something about a painting!
About the Remote viewers seeing Harvey at the beach, that's not how it happened, they also claim to see who Courtney described has Harvey but they also saw and interact with several other beings that were in the beach and Courtney never ask for them to see as far as i remember! the same goes for the board meetings when everyone is piking in the energy of the beings and how they are..
The narrative of Farsight is so far out that creates disruption in our belief system and because of that we loose our ground in what is true and what is not that we start to try and find bits and pieces that can validate our fears, it's also of course about the truth.. i don't believe Courtney is manipulating narratives through the targets, i do believe targets can have his bias of course like all of us that create targets but he is well aware of that and the experience he has, remindes me of Human News when the remote viewers were getting validation from their future predictions, i remember people asking why the data for that month shows so much military activity, this was when russia and ukraine was going on in the beginnings, and Courtney stated something like he did create targets that didn't focus on the war but still the remote viewers were getting results about it so much so that Courtney believed that Farsight data was somehow influencing a bit of russia or ukraine strategic plans in the battlefield.. and many more other verifiables.
We always knew that there's need to be cautious about the targets because of bias and front loading that's why we've always discuss the importance of other remote viewers doing projects on the same questions to verify Farsight claims which is something that many people have been doing and seeing, in this case Future Forecasting Group with some projects that Farsight also claims, for example, their targets about mars where Dick and Daz also got data like Farsight did, also Down the Rabbit Hole where Daz has been targeting some of Farsight claims and the viewers have been getting identical results, Dave Powell from Owl003 did some remote viewing session about Farsight and FFG and also the board meetings where Dave and the remote viewers of Farsight were seeing the same beings.. also Dave from Uncontrolled remote viewing when trying to dismantle the narrative about the grid and the reincarnational trap about also got greys beings and other data like Farsight... Brett Stuart from Remote viewing institute also did a session about the prison system where he got the same results like Farsight which led him to take time to recover from that session. I mean im not here to defend Farsight but if we are going to assume stuff about them we have also to assume about the other groups.. that is why is important for people to start validating the data for themselves which then leads to at least 2 consequences ... the credibility of Farsight is validated because there is a huge amount of remote viewers that had the same data or none of the groups are credible because they all got the same data than Farsight.

"what is the full truth ? .. anyones guess .. if we cannot grill Harvey over a set of 20 to 50 live interviews .. then how can we ever get to the bottom of it ourselves ? .. now Harvey could have done 50 live interviews in 2025 .. and man !! if he had .. and he was legit and was able to answer our questions as an ET could "

yeah we've been talking about that for quite some time now, i don't think it would make 10 times more the amount of subscribers because people will find another to doubt, for example Harvey answering us and we thinking that "he is probably deceiving us, this is probably another psyop agenda" and so on, which can be also true but you never know!

@David Lyon:

"Farsight never claim to be 'The Source of Truth'"

Courtney claims it all the time.

@Keymaker:

"Courtney now claims he does not know about the Tanner Dam project"

My guess is he just forgot. Memory is subjective. You tend to forget what doesn't fit your worldview. In Courtneys worldview, there is no remote viewing of non-existing targets. At least that's my impression of him. He only keeps what fits his opinion. He even admits it in his reply to your comment: He ignores the "nutty things".

Wow, keymaker successful troll of Courtney. And I thought it couldn't be done.

Well I am genuinely interested in a well designed "Farsight: For and against" document, so far I have not seen.

I'll try to read everything here if I get around to it.

Well, I am glad Keymaker posted those links here on the forum because it reminded me to go back to the Yeme session comments to see if others felt like I did regarding the avatar and cartoon session with the Mo-cap suit. And it sounds like a lot of people agree it is not what they want to see. But then I saw it was Dimitrius who challenged Courtney with the link to his Dick Alguire session. I found the whole article very enlightening. And it has made me question "ALL" of the sessions I have viewed on the Farsight platform over the last year and half, and further back on following them on Youtube. I was going to try to watch more of the sessions before I unenroll this week, but now I think; Why bother.

Why are post's being deleted?

Looks like Keymaker's posts were deleted. He said he thought they might do that.

Can Courtney not remembering that project in specific since it was made in 2008, like 18 years ago?!
Not to defend him but if you have proof of that there wouldn't be any necessity to him to neglect it in the first place unkess he doesn't remembers!
Also once again i don't believe Courtney deleted his comments and from what im getting it was Keymaker that did..
i've been here some time now and for what i understand you cannot have an account, liking the comments and not being able to engage! He cannot be kicked out of the platform and liking comments!

"Artur, Keymaker would not have deleted all his comments on every post here, and under the Remote Viewing sessions." He would if he wanted to prove his point! not the first time i see people doing that here!

For that reason i ask you Courtney to verify us this, if you did in some way shape or form prohibit Keymaker engagement or even deleted his comments!?

Censorship is never the answer. Unless, one of the subscribers is threatening another member or the farsight team. Otherwise, we are no different than what we are trying to all prevent here with the current state of affairs. I have long applauded farsight when I have felt they have done excellent project (which they have), and I have criticized them when they have done shitty projects (which IMO they have). But we are all here to discuss things. Many predictions Courtney has predicted at this time haven't occurred, we shouldn't be censored for that, it's a fact we can go back a year or two ago and look at the spotlights, intelligence briefings, etc.

At the end of the day we should all be here for disclosure. That was what I thought the point of farsight going from farsight to farsight prime. But if we will censor each other, the message will stall and subscribers will drop like flies. Let's be better than that.

Courtney should be more resilient than to let a frustrated subscriber get under his skin.