In the Farsight 3.0 Spotlight titled "Transforming Earthlings", Courtney says this:
[18:29] "If you watch any type of animation on TV and stuff, it's fantasy. It may be great to watch and may have powerful messages, but it's just fantasy. When you watch Farsight stuff that has animation in it, you're watching the real thing."
This is a clear lie, and the animations in the 3I/Atlas video prove it:
1. The animation showed that Aziz' consciousness was put in a grey hybrid body. This was NOT part of the remote viewing data.
2. The animation showed that this "50 percent Aziz" flew in a spaceship and landed on 3I/Atlas. This was NOT part of the remote viewing data.
3. The animation showed that the ships who attacked 3I/Atlas came from Earth. This was NOT part of the remote viewing data.
4. The animation showed that Earth is called a "Controlled Evolution Zone". This was NOT part of the remote viewing data.
5. The animation showed that 50 percent Aziz escaped the attack. This was NOT part of the remote viewing data.
To me, it looks like Farsight is now utilizing techniques of subliminal messaging in order to promote a certain narrative that is not backed by raw remote viewing data.
And even if it were backed by the data, Farsight is still ignoring the fact that there's no verification. Farsight admits to be connected to either one or more ETs, or to some sort of technology, in order to "enhance" remote viewing perceptions. We have no verification that this connection doesn't adulterate the data. We also can't replicate what Farsight is doing.
So, the claim at the beginning that Farsight is not channeling also is a lie. They are connected to some entity or technology. How do we know that this entity or technology isn't channeling images that aren't true? If we viewed the same targets and got different results, who would be right?
In short: It's NOT the real thing.
If people believe Farsight because of fancy animations instead of scientific evidence, why wouldn't the bad guys use Farsight as another psy-op in order to manipulate Earthlings?
As a paying customer, I demand the following:
1. Farsight should be remote viewing like everybody else, without being connected to an ET entity or technology. That's the only way to get pure data.
2. Farsight should embrace the scientific principle of verification. Data that hasn't been verified must be seen as speculative until proven correct. Remote viewing alone can't prove that the data is correct.