In this thread:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/76726-an-experiment

...I started an experiment that can be broken down to a simple formular: Use remote viewing for counting. The target must be formulated in a way that whatever is asked for, it must be something that exists and is countable.

I'm interested in investigating this special case because it's a good way of practicing the ability to receive numbers. As we all know, remote viewing numbers seems to be really difficult, or even impossible, because they are an abstract construct. They don't exist in reality as an observable object. But it should be doable if the numbers are attached to an observable reality.

Instructions:

1. The tasker provides a scale that always starts at 0 and ends with an arbitrary number greater than the correct number.

2. The viewer draws a line from A, which is 0, to B, which is the end of the scale.

3. The viewer marks the spot on the line that represents the correct number.

Example:

The target is the number of humans that were physically present in the room at the October 2025 board meeting. The tasker chooses 10 as the end of the scale. The correct number would be 5, so the viewers should mark the middle of the line if they are on target.

If you want to try it, here's a target:

Target: 6310-9983
Scale: 0...100

TARGET REVEAL:

6310-9983

The total number of upright standing stones that are part of the structure that is known as Stonehenge, at the end of November 2025.

This concept I'm about to bring up may or may not be related to what you're doing, but I often conceived: what if you had 10 unique targets that are very unlike one another. For example one is the Eiffel tower circa 2025, another is the hour of most human death at the battle of Normandy (just to give an example of contrast) ... anyhow you get 10, and the remote viewer isn't aware of the numerical purpose. But at the end someone takes the remote viewing data and tries to interpret the sessions into a series of numbers.

This might sound like just a funny experiment but it's not. The implications are things like lottery numbers, winning teams, or codes I to vaults. Furthermore, a powerful way of proving beyond very staunch skeptics.