I know our perception of time as being linear is not a reality. I feel this may actually be one of the largest things humans need to acclimate to when the prison walls come down. Personally, I found it helpful to start with how different cultures perceive time before trying to understand upper dimensions of existence. An old article I like on the subject: https://www.businessinsider.com/how-different-cultures-understand-time-2014-5?r=US&IR=T
After you're done with that, try to wrap your head around this:
.What do you mean by linear? Are you aware that linear doesn't mean straight?
Regarding the video:
Imagine a 2D being in front of you. Draw a figure on paper if you can't imagine it. Then draw a line from left to right. That line is representing the timeline of the 2D being.
Now branch the timeline. You, as a 3D being, should be able to do that, right? How would you do it?
It's interesting that nobody aswered my question.
Here's my point: You, as a 3D being, would see the 2D being not like you see a drawing on paper. You would see the entire life of that being as a 3D model. Let me explain:
For the sake of simplicity, imagine that the being is a circle. But as that circle is moving through time, and time for that being would be the 3rd dimension, you as a 3D being would see the whole spacetime representation of the 2D being. Imagine it's moving from A to B in a straight line. You would see a straight tube. That tube is the entire life of that being.
This means that if there is a branch in its timeline, the being would look like a tube intersecting with a second tube. Think of it like a branch on a tree. The being is the entire tree, and the branches are different timelines. You, as a 3D being, would see all the branches at once, because the 2D time is a space dimension for you. This means that a 2D being would look to you like a network of branches, similar to a tree.
You can apply the same logic to higher dimensions. Our time would be the 4th dimension, so you, as a 3D being, would look to a 4D being like a 4D tree. The being would see your entire life at once. Just like the entire life of the 2D being would be a 3D model to you, your entire life – including all the timelines – would be a 4D model to a 4D being.
This is the basic logic of string theory.
But here's the thing: If this was true, the life of a 2D being would be predetermined, as its 3D body would have a distinct form, and the life of a 3D being would be predetermined, as its 4D body would have a distinct form, and so on. But predetermination obviously contradicts free will.
And that's why string theory is a false concept. At least to a certain degree.
The solution to the problem of predetermination is to acknowledge that time is not a space dimension. The whole idea of spacetime doesn't make sense. Instead, time is the change in space dimensions, which is the change within the projection. Time exists because change exists.
The result of this paradigm shift is that only the past can be a space dimension, because the past is determined. Think of it as a record of change, stored in space. For example, imagine the 2D being again. Let's say it looks like a tree to you. But that tree is only the past of that being. It's the decisions it made so far. The future is not included. Because of this, you would see that tree growing.
This means, regardless of the space dimension you perceive, growth is always occuring, and that growth is what we call time.
And you can't tell how a being would grow. You can only extrapolate.
That's why we can't predict the future with remote viewing. Timelines can grow in nearly infinite directions. We just can't know with 100% certainty in which directon a timeline will grow.
See also: ➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/77010-the-paradox-of-non-local-perception
That's why social science is at the top. Social science is the science of decisions. This means it not only tells us how to extrapolate the growth of timelines, it also tells us how to manipulate the decisions of ISBEs in order to control the growth of timelines.