The latest Spotlight titled "2025 to 2026" finally convinced me to cancel my subscription.
In the video, Courtney explains how bad it is to believe channelers, because the entities they channel don't have good intentions. He confirmed how easy it is to manipulate people through channeling, and that the bad ETs obviously take advantage of that.
I agree. It's easy to manipulate people through channeling, because the people who are willing to believe words without proof are gullible. They don't want to think for themselves. They don't want to bear the responsibility of evaluating information based on their own knowledge and critical thinking. It's a form of laziness. Thinking for yourself not only is hard work, it also comes with the possibility of being wrong.
In short: It's easier to believe what you're being told than to come to your own conclusions.
And Farsight is doing exactly the same.
Farsight believes the words of who Courtney calls the "good ETs". Courtney explained that he is going to the ships where he is receiving instructions. They don't talk to him, they don't explain things, and he doesn't seem to ask questions. He gets a download like a drone. This already is creepy.
But the main nail in the coffin is how Farsight conducts remote viewing. Farsight doesn't remote view like all the others. According to Courtney, Farsight's viewers channel their consciousness through an ET, or ET technology. And they actually don't know how it works.
Here's how Courtney described it in the "Death of Jeffrey Epstein: Revised 2024" video:
[3:24] "Now, these early data, that we released back in 2019, show evidence of remote viewing tampering and mental blocking. You need to see this to know what was truly going on. I originally interpreted these data as supporting the idea that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. But that original interpretation was wrong.
The reevaluation of the early data was done in early 2024, only after new data that fixed the mental blocking aspect were obtained. After you see these early session, I will return to explain exactly what happened, and I will encourage you to watch the new data being released as part of our Deep News project in 2024. [...]"
[35:15] "Friends, these Time-Cross project data were published in November 2019, and it is now 2024 when I'm recording this. My original analysis of these early data regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein concluded that we had no evidence that he was murdered. I said that our evidence suggested that the idea of suicide seemed more likely. However, I now know that those early conclusions were wrong. [...]"
[36:51] "Here's the thing: With remote viewing, you only perceive what you look for. If you don't look for something, there is a high likelihood that you don't see it. So if any remote viewer says that they did a session and didn't see such and such, that doesn't prove that the thing was not there. If they are accurate in what they did perceive, then you can say that what they did perceive was probably at the target. But they cannot say anything about what they did not perceive, unless they specifically looked for that thing and noted it was not there. This is true for all remote viewing done by anyone anywhere regardless of the remote viewing methodology used.
Now, in none of our early Jeffrey Epstein sessions did we specifically target the mechanism of death for Jeffrey Epstein. We only targeted Jeffrey Epstein, and we got that he died. And, at that time, he was alone. But none of our viewers saw exactly how he died, or who was with him when he was dying. Except for the seemingly invisible people perceived by PrinCess Jeaneé and Khamia Dunson. So, given the fact that our viewers did perceive others in the room with Epstein – but Yeme Jeaneé, PrinCess Jeaneé, perceived those others as some sort of evil spiritual beings, and Khamia Dunson perceived another subject as an imaginary friend who Jeffrey Epstein was talking with, and all of the viewers found him in a high state of panic, as if he was being attacked – I have to state that this really does look like there was some external mental manipulation of the remote viewing results that was distorting their perceptions of the actual death event itself. That is, it seems like something was interfering with or blocking our viewers from seeing exactly what was happening to Jeffrey Epstein.
Let me explain how this works: It is possible for remote viewers to be mentally led astray with their perceptions by trained external actors, and we do have procedures that can prevent this at Farsight. But we did not use those procedures with these early Epstein results. In the absence of such procedures, extraterrestrials can corrupt remote viewing data easily, and the group of extraterrestrials who we call the bad ETs unsuccessfully attempt this all the time with our viewers at Farsight. I say unsuccessfully, because we normally use anti-blocking procedures whenever we do a project involving a target that might attract the attention of the bad ETs. Also, there are highly trained humans who work for the US government who are capable at doing this, although they are probably not nearly as good at it as the bad ETs themselves, who can use technological enhancements. When this type of interference happens, the viewers working a project typically do perceive stuff, but some of the data come across as simply weird. With tell-tale signs including things such as invisible friends, or black magic stuff.
Again, at the time that we did this early project on the death of Jeffrey Epstein, we were not using our anti-blocking methods for those sessions. We do indeed have methods that can blast through any attempts by extraterrestrials or government operatives to corrupt our data. There is no known way to block us when we use those methods. Those methods employ the assistance of a group of extraterrestrials who we call the good ETs, and the methods essentially involve having an ET from that group use whatever methods that they have, including technological methods, to blast through the blocking attempts, and our remote viewers ride that consciousness like a carrier wave through to the target, encountering absolutely no interference of any kind.
So, when we collected the original data for the death of Jeffrey Epstein, there were signs that our viewers were being messed with, and in retrospect I should have used the anti-blocking procedures when the viewers did that target. My bad."
This unreflected willingness to go through an external consciousness or technology proves that Farsight is as gullible as the channelers. They don't know what happens on the other side. They don't know whether the ETs mess with the viewers perception. They don't even ask questions.
Summary:
- Farsight's remote viewing data could be incorrect. The so-called "good ETs" could feed them manipulative data without the viewers noticing it. The viewers don't seem to be capable of detecting whether their perception is tampered with.
- Farsight believes that they can "blast through" any blocking attempts. This not only is an arrogant attitude, it also can be dangerous if it's not true.
- Farsight doesn't adress this issue and its implications at all. They're doing business as if there's no problem. We are basically told to trust the so-called good ETs because Farsight does.
I'm not willing to fund this ignorance any longer.