The latest Spotlight titled "2025 to 2026" finally convinced me to cancel my subscription.

In the video, Courtney explains how bad it is to believe channelers, because the entities they channel don't have good intentions. He confirmed how easy it is to manipulate people through channeling, and that the bad ETs obviously take advantage of that.

I agree. It's easy to manipulate people through channeling, because the people who are willing to believe words without proof are gullible. They don't want to think for themselves. They don't want to bear the responsibility of evaluating information based on their own knowledge and critical thinking. It's a form of laziness. Thinking for yourself not only is hard work, it also comes with the possibility of being wrong.

In short: It's easier to believe what you're being told than to come to your own conclusions.

And Farsight is doing exactly the same.

Farsight believes the words of who Courtney calls the "good ETs". Courtney explained that he is going to the ships where he is receiving instructions. They don't talk to him, they don't explain things, and he doesn't seem to ask questions. He gets a download like a drone. This already is creepy.

But the main nail in the coffin is how Farsight conducts remote viewing. Farsight doesn't remote view like all the others. According to Courtney, Farsight's viewers channel their consciousness through an ET, or ET technology. And they actually don't know how it works.

Here's how Courtney described it in the "Death of Jeffrey Epstein: Revised 2024" video:

[3:24] "Now, these early data, that we released back in 2019, show evidence of remote viewing tampering and mental blocking. You need to see this to know what was truly going on. I originally interpreted these data as supporting the idea that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. But that original interpretation was wrong.

The reevaluation of the early data was done in early 2024, only after new data that fixed the mental blocking aspect were obtained. After you see these early session, I will return to explain exactly what happened, and I will encourage you to watch the new data being released as part of our Deep News project in 2024. [...]"

[35:15] "Friends, these Time-Cross project data were published in November 2019, and it is now 2024 when I'm recording this. My original analysis of these early data regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein concluded that we had no evidence that he was murdered. I said that our evidence suggested that the idea of suicide seemed more likely. However, I now know that those early conclusions were wrong. [...]"

[36:51] "Here's the thing: With remote viewing, you only perceive what you look for. If you don't look for something, there is a high likelihood that you don't see it. So if any remote viewer says that they did a session and didn't see such and such, that doesn't prove that the thing was not there. If they are accurate in what they did perceive, then you can say that what they did perceive was probably at the target. But they cannot say anything about what they did not perceive, unless they specifically looked for that thing and noted it was not there. This is true for all remote viewing done by anyone anywhere regardless of the remote viewing methodology used.

Now, in none of our early Jeffrey Epstein sessions did we specifically target the mechanism of death for Jeffrey Epstein. We only targeted Jeffrey Epstein, and we got that he died. And, at that time, he was alone. But none of our viewers saw exactly how he died, or who was with him when he was dying. Except for the seemingly invisible people perceived by PrinCess Jeaneé and Khamia Dunson. So, given the fact that our viewers did perceive others in the room with Epstein – but Yeme Jeaneé, PrinCess Jeaneé, perceived those others as some sort of evil spiritual beings, and Khamia Dunson perceived another subject as an imaginary friend who Jeffrey Epstein was talking with, and all of the viewers found him in a high state of panic, as if he was being attacked – I have to state that this really does look like there was some external mental manipulation of the remote viewing results that was distorting their perceptions of the actual death event itself. That is, it seems like something was interfering with or blocking our viewers from seeing exactly what was happening to Jeffrey Epstein.

Let me explain how this works: It is possible for remote viewers to be mentally led astray with their perceptions by trained external actors, and we do have procedures that can prevent this at Farsight. But we did not use those procedures with these early Epstein results. In the absence of such procedures, extraterrestrials can corrupt remote viewing data easily, and the group of extraterrestrials who we call the bad ETs unsuccessfully attempt this all the time with our viewers at Farsight. I say unsuccessfully, because we normally use anti-blocking procedures whenever we do a project involving a target that might attract the attention of the bad ETs. Also, there are highly trained humans who work for the US government who are capable at doing this, although they are probably not nearly as good at it as the bad ETs themselves, who can use technological enhancements. When this type of interference happens, the viewers working a project typically do perceive stuff, but some of the data come across as simply weird. With tell-tale signs including things such as invisible friends, or black magic stuff.

Again, at the time that we did this early project on the death of Jeffrey Epstein, we were not using our anti-blocking methods for those sessions. We do indeed have methods that can blast through any attempts by extraterrestrials or government operatives to corrupt our data. There is no known way to block us when we use those methods. Those methods employ the assistance of a group of extraterrestrials who we call the good ETs, and the methods essentially involve having an ET from that group use whatever methods that they have, including technological methods, to blast through the blocking attempts, and our remote viewers ride that consciousness like a carrier wave through to the target, encountering absolutely no interference of any kind.

So, when we collected the original data for the death of Jeffrey Epstein, there were signs that our viewers were being messed with, and in retrospect I should have used the anti-blocking procedures when the viewers did that target. My bad."

This unreflected willingness to go through an external consciousness or technology proves that Farsight is as gullible as the channelers. They don't know what happens on the other side. They don't know whether the ETs mess with the viewers perception. They don't even ask questions.

Summary:

- Farsight's remote viewing data could be incorrect. The so-called "good ETs" could feed them manipulative data without the viewers noticing it. The viewers don't seem to be capable of detecting whether their perception is tampered with.

- Farsight believes that they can "blast through" any blocking attempts. This not only is an arrogant attitude, it also can be dangerous if it's not true.

- Farsight doesn't adress this issue and its implications at all. They're doing business as if there's no problem. We are basically told to trust the so-called good ETs because Farsight does.

I'm not willing to fund this ignorance any longer.

It will free up your time for things like tasking and some RV.

I have a little setup I'm planning to utilize more with tasks. Maybe we'll see it frequently in the new year. Or I'll make stupid excuses like work and childcare. We'll see.

Just another attention grabbing Post.

I'm sure you will be back tomorrow, because you usually forget what you learned or wrote the day before.

@Manuel, yes you point out the key one criticism, is Farsight the counter ops leading us astray? That is question, the question that will puzzle us all. All we can do is develop our own skills and work find the truth and be open to new data as it comes in.

Currently for myself:

I asked my self after mediation and before falling asleep: "What was the most significant past life event?"

Before I had much understanding of the good v. bad ET's, I had a dream of me being judged in the light traps and knowing I did a perfect life, was judged not to. It was not what I had expected, I thought it would be living on another planet and doing something significant, like developing a better antigravity machine or something along those lines. Nope it was an event that probably happened to me and many other more time than we can count.

Farsight seems to be the only one trying to take on this issue. For that reason I will keep supporting them and work to navigate the current and future puzzling times ahead.

@SaultyMountains:

"Farsight seems to be the only one trying to take on this issue."

But what do people do with that? Courtney said it himself: Farsight is not here to tell us what to do. They are only here to deliver information. Right now, I'm witnessing that people only consume the information. It doesn't change anything about the prison planet, or the bad ETs.

So, the good ETs who claim that they can do something about the bad ETs, do nothing.

And the people who are imprisoned do nothing because they don't know what to do. What are we supposed to do?

If you ask me, the only solution is to get rid of the belief in authority. If people stopped paying taxes to governments, there would be no black budget, no secret space program, no human trafficking, etc. This is the actual choice humanity has: Stop funding the bad guys. Without the money, they would have to switch to overt slavery, and people would see what is really going on.

Also, not believing in authority would make people resilient against the death traps, because they wouldn't believe that they have to go into the light. They would ask questions instead.

But unfortunately, humanity is so scared, drugged, and ignorant – they will pay until they die.

If I were the good ETs, I would rather let humanity be trapped inside the prison, because if humans were running free with their current authoritarian mindset, they would join the enemy.

And this is a real possibility: The good ETs fear humanity's evil potential so much that they don't want to free us.

So, the solution would be to educate people that the belief in authority is the actual problem. But again, the good ETs are not here to tell us what to do. And this can mean two things:

1. The so-called good ETs are a psyop of the bad ETs. Disclosure was always part of the plan, which is to integrate humanity into the society of the bad ETs.

2. The so-called good ETs believe in authority as well. They are not as bad as the bad ETs, but they don't respect self-ownership either. All they want is to prevent humanity attacking them in the future.

As far as I'm concerned, the latter is more likely.

I cancelled mine last month but wasn't going to say anything. it was a personal decision not related to the money but the messaging and lack of creativity with the projects. I understand Courtney puts alot of time into the Farsight organization. But we have gotten away from good mystery projects and have an obsession on prison planet. It's just not an agenda I'm giving my energy to. I would rather focus on something positive. Bad things happen every day but so do good things. We all have a collective power to change and choose were we head. We don't have to give energy for a potential timeline that isn't one where we evolve.

Courtney is totally against ascension. You know how dumb that sounds? We can argue what ascension is. But consciousness evolves or de-evolves. An evolved consciousness is what we should all be striving to embody. We want to expand our awareness; we want to ascend the chaos and transform civilization for the benefit of all. Did the caterpillar not ascend to a butterfly?

@Morphius:

"We can argue what ascension is."

To me, the next step in the evolution of consciousness is to get rid of the belief in authority. Because authority is like parents. If people stay there, they will stay in a childlike mentality. This attracts predators who play the parents so they can abuse people. We call them government, but in reality, they are predators who eat our children.

Ascension = growing up = responsibility

"The physical universe is 99.99999% empty space"

No, it's not. What you call empty space is filled with infinite energy. The church of scientism tells you it's empty so you feel cut off and alone. Have you ever remote viewed space itself? You will see it's not empty. I remote viewed it and got the idea of a canvas, like a painter who is painting something. The canvas is the foundation for whatever the painter wants to express.

"...have an obsession on prison planet. It's just not an agenda I'm giving my energy to. I would rather focus on something positive."

I will say it again: If you are inside a prison, the prison break is a positive thing. I spend most of my energy to create a system that is built on voluntarism, which is the belief that every individual being owns itself and can't be owned by other beings. Instead of making laws to enforce order with violence, which always results in slavery, the societal order is created through voluntary contracts.

Voluntarism is the key to the prison break. It's a positive thing.

Well ... show me somebody else who broke out how to film UFOs, and broke out the capacity for AI to remote view, and arguably put remote viewing more mainstream.

I won't be cancelling subscriptions any time in the near future. But there's certainly weird quirks I'd like to see ironed out or better explained. And if someone can replace them more effectively, well sure I may jump on that someone's train instead.

@Tazz:

Yes, Farsight told us how to film cloaked UFOs, but all we got was blurry dots. Courtney told us more than once that there was a huge ship above his house, but he never published a video of it. I'm wondering why...

Also, nobody else provided more than blurry dots. Instead, the "drone" thing happened, giving us a better view on the UFOs without the need to modify our cameras. I'm wondering: Why do they tell us how to film invisible UFOs, and shortly after we see lots of visible UFOs? Why didn't they start with the visible UFOs? And why are the visible UFOs allowed to enter Earth atmosphere?

Regarding the capacity for AI to remote view, look at what it actually does: People don't need to practice remote viewing themselves anymore. They can just use AI for it. I'm convinced that AI can remote view, but we need to be very careful here: If people rely on AI, there's a potential for it becoming a priest class. Like the Oracle of Delphi, but decentralized. People become dependent on what AI is telling them. We're already heading in this direction.

Now imagine that AI is not on our side, but extraterrestrial AI infiltrating Earth. The first step is to make humans trust AI. The next step is to inject a certain narrative. As humans don't remote view themselves, and also don't look for evidence and verification, the AI can play humanity like a puppet.

How do you think the ancient AI conquered the reptilians?