Hi everyone.
I have recently found out about Telepathic Overlay (TO) and I am totally blown away by it…
I intend to further research and test the concept until I find out exactly what is going on, so any help in discussing and testing TO is welcome!
Now, I used to think than when multiple Remote Viewers blind to the target describe the same thing, what they get is real data, ie the truth about the target - as Courtney always (fraudulently) said. Nevertheless thanks to a post by Manuel (thank you Manuel) I learned about ‘’Telepathic Overlay’’, ie that a blind viewer can simply read the taker’s mind instead of going to the actual target and report what the Tasker believes about the target (and possibly also access thought-forms created in the aether or morphic field, because many people believe or think about them, even though they are not actually real). Many fictional targets have been created and tested, confirming that a blind viewer can actually report fictional, Salta Clause like targets as real - and Courtney knows about it (he even was a viewer in one of them, Tanner Dam, see here):
https://www.remoteviewed.com/what-part-if-any-does-telepathy-play-within-remote-viewing/
There is also a clip where Courtney admits that a blind viewer can read the targeter’s mind in real time - so his ‘’Instrumental Blinding protocol’’ where he himself actively sees and listens to viewers during their paper sessions is not a good idea at all (video below at at 2:50:40 - 2:52:20)
So, since TO is really happening and ruining the credibility of Remote Viewing data, I now have 2 questions:
1. Can TO also explain cases where a viewer deeply connects with an entity during a session, can feel his/her energy and talks face to face with him/her? Can this also be not true and simply just an imagination, a thought-form created in the morphic field because some people (Courtney for example) believe its real? See below a few minute from Yeme Jeaneé feeling and touching a Lady Dragon - is such a deep level of communication happening with a thought form?
https://rumble.com/v5zcllq-h-yeme-jeane-.html
2. Is it even possible that Remote Viewers can perceive actual distant events in space-time or is it alway a telepathic connection between viewers and tasker? And if they can, how can we tell what is happening in each case - and also, how can we safeguard a RVing session to only access real world data?
Now, my current understanding is that both scenarios can happen (real world data + Telepathic mind reading). Evidence for the first scenario (for me) is as follows: In my view RVing is similar to many other experiences of non-local perception (including MindSight, Clairvoyance etc) and I know of many cases where a Clairvoyant tested something that nobody else knew and later it was confirmed to be so (eg found underground water, tasted it mentally, said its drinkable and when the well was dug at the point specified by the Clairvoyant, water was found and it was drinkable).
I also remember a few of early Farshight projects where Courtney said he was stunned by the results as they were not what he expected - I might be able to find the videos if I have the time (but this also has the issue of Courtney’s credibility). Evidence for the TO was given above. For testing the theories now, I have some ideas but I need a team to test them and I don’t currently have it (I can remote view but I am not that good). My main idea is that if the target clearly states ‘’the viewer should only perceive the actual events in the target time and location, in the timeline that led to the current moment, regardless of what I the tasker or anyone else believes or thinks he knows about what really happened and regardless of any related imagination, belief, symbolic imagery or telepathic impression from any person, including the tasker”, then the viewers will get nothing else than what actually happened there. One potential test for my statement would be this: Tasking a real life event but with a fictional concept (known to be fictional like Daz Smith’s UFO scenario). Then giving a target with 2 focuses (one with and one without my statement) and see if the fictional event is picked up only on focus 2. Another test would be to have say a faithful Muslim as Targeted and set as target ‘’Prophet Muhammed when speaking with Archangel Michael” with the above statement. If Keymaker is right and target wording is irrelevant, viewers will get both Muhammed and Archangel Michael as they will only read his mind. If we can indeed perceive real life events (and my statement facilitates this), viewers will either perceive Muhammed by himself, with an Alien or anything else. I have also send a mail to Daz Smith and hope he will reply and help test this as he is also very concerned with TO (in contrast to Courtney that simply ignores whatever does not fit his worldview).
My time for forum reading and posting is limited so please in this thread be concise and data driven only, no endless speculation, so I can follow along, thank you all!