https://skepticalaboutskeptics.org/
Also examine the works of author/researcher: Marcello Truzzi
Time-Stamp: 030TL01m07.T11:34Z
Amongst the most «Falsifiable» of claims are those made by the Pseudo-Skeptics;
Apparently, a lot of them won't even READ, and, behaviour is _very_ predictable;
They are most-certainly ALWAYS «Materialists/Physicalists» with Dogmatic-Biases;
Amongst these Biases are a Tendency towards a BELIEF in the Null-Hypothesis.
Yes, a BELIEF-SYSTEM, such that they make «claims» which sound like the following:
«We already know that's not possible so there's no need for us to look at the evidence.»
Really? Seriously, bro? Scientific-Parapsychologists have published replicable-data on para-normal phenomena for what is now not just mere DECADES but for CENTURIES...
The MOST «Falsifiable» phenomenon that exists amongst populations of Pseudo-Skeptics, Materialists, Physicalists, etc., are that their BEHAVIOUR is like that of those «Lawyers» who ONLY «see» or «present» ONE «side» of the «Evidence-Spectrum» and these are OBSERVABLE Behavioural-Traits as listed by Winston Wu in his Treatise on Debunking the Debunkers in this comparison...
https://www.debunkingskeptics.com/characteristics.php
Marcello Truzzi had also noticed these kinds of «irrational» behaviours and other authors and genuine scientists had also noticed the behaviours of what could only be called «irrational-rationalism» since there are those who do in fact often «parrot» the phrase «It's just not rational» when they come across «claims» (no matter how well backed up by evidence) which do not match their belief...
https://carlosorsi.substack.com/p/the-irrational-rationalists
Yes. Belief. Here is a bit more of a «logic» break-down...
There is no item in the box. i.e.: Value = 0/False. This is the Null-Hypothesis. Belief of Value = Null.
There IS an item in the box. i.e.: Value = True/1+. This is the Positive-Belief.
NEITHER of the Above «Positions» are «Agnostic» nor undecided.
The «Belief» ALREADY EXISTS that «Value = TRUE» OR «Value = FALSE»
TRUE «Agnosticism» would look more like: «Value = Undecided/Non-Defined»
TRUE «Objectivity» would be «Let's check the box BEFORE we decide the actual Value...»
Back to mention of Marcello Truzzi...
https://grokipedia.com/page/Truzzi
Then there are more publications on Remote-Viewing done as Meta-Analyses...
Also look-up what a «Meta-Analysis» is if you don't have that definition down...
I may as well create a set of Tests and Exams and Quizzes.
You will be «graded» on your ability to use «Logic» and identify what «Fallacies» are.
Class now dismissed and your ability to comprehend this affects your ETERNAL-DESTINY...
Time-Stamp: 030TL05m27d/18h38Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)