In the Farsight Spotlight titled "Anatomy of a Revolution", Courtney says this:

[4:32] "I'm not talking about personal memory or anything like that, I'm talking about civilization memory."

I needed to pause there, because an interesting question popped up in my mind:

Why do we need civilization memory when we have remote viewing? 🤔

I decided to make a Q&A session, which is me asking questions into the void and writing down the first answers that come back to me. It's a bit like remote viewing – I'm receiving ideas and just write down what feels right, without thinking about whether I agree or not. I don't know who answers me. Is it channeling? Maybe. Is it me remembering forgotten knowledge? Could be.

So, this is where the question led me:

Question: Why do we need civilization memory when we have remote viewing?

Answer: Because remote viewing doesn't solve the problem. For remote viewing to work, you have to be able to ask the right questions. You have to have knowledge about how remote viewing works, and what problems come with it (like telepathic interference, for instance). The amnesia mechanism of the death traps lets you forget the right questions. That's why this body of knowledge needs to be stored outside of the ISBE.

Question: Does "outside of the ISBE" mean "in the field"?

Answer: Yes and no. Here's an analogy: Imagine a person who only knows how to read and write. This person can store knowledge on physical devices, like paper, stone, and computers. But if the person forgets how to read, the physical devices become useless. Writing is an institution. You have to learn it again and again. It's the same with the knowledge of how to access the field. (Note: Correct is fields, plural, because my understanding of "the field" is limited).

Question: But then disassembling the death traps should be the actual solution, right?

Answer: No. If your civilization is built on recreation of the body, regardless of whether it's through biological birth or technological repair, the body always has to be informed in order to make it suitable for your current state of consciousness.

Question: This doesn't make sense. If my ISBE consciousness doesn't forget because it's not going through the death traps, it would inform the body on its own, right?

Answer: No. Informing the body means something different. I means to make it capable of translating the information. Imagine a dog. The dog has a dog brain. The ISBE can inhabit the body of the dog, but it's limited to what the dog brain is capable of. Higher faculties, like language or telepathy, would be filtered out.

Question: If I understand it correctly, civilization memory can be boiled down to the question of how to build a physical brain, right?

Answer: Yes.

Question: So, is it possible for an advanced ISBE to manifest a brain out of thin air?

Answer: Yes and no. According to the laws of the universe you are in, all creation is a chain reaction. If you want to manifest a complex brain, you have to start with an atom. (Note: Atom is wrong, but it makes the concept comprehensible.) You have to start at the beginning and follow the chain reaction. You call this process evolution. If you want to skip steps in this process, you still need the knowledge of how to do so. Think of the replicator in Star Trek. It's possible to replicate a brain, but you still need a complex brain to build the first replicator.

Question: Does this mean the ISBE can't manifest matter through will power?

Answer: Correct. The ISBE can only manipulate the fields, which precede matter. If you put the pattern of a complex brain into the field, it doesn't mean that matter will magically manifest. Think of it like digging a ditch for water. The ditch doesn't move water if there's no water in the first place.

Question: I get the sense that evolution is the easiest way of making things work.

Answer: In the physical, yes.

Question: Why is there a physical world at all? It seems to make things more complicated than they should be.

Answer: That's exactly the point.