Many people have questioned Farsight's remote viewing results over the years, and there's good reason for some skepticism. In the past, a lot of their sessions seemed to pick up distorted or manipulated signals—almost like the information was being intercepted by some kind of overlay or interference field, twisted, and then fed back to the viewers. This wasn't necessarily them lying on purpose; it was more like the system (whatever 'system' means—collective distortions, external influences, or something else) was jamming or bending the pure data. That's why threads pop up calling them 'liars' or saying the info can't be trusted—people felt the dissonance.
But things have shifted. The distortion fields and overlays that used to mess with the signal appear to be cleared or nullified now. Recent projects (like their looks at 2025-2026 events, Venezuela predictions, or ongoing mysteries) seem to come through cleaner, with less interception. The viewers are pulling from a more direct, unfiltered source again.
They're not claiming perfect accuracy—remote viewing never is 100%—but the manipulation angle feels less active. If you've followed them, watch the raw sessions yourself (mute the commentary if needed) and see what resonates. The distrust was earned before, but the channel looks more open now. Thoughts?