Many people have questioned Farsight's remote viewing results over the years, and there's good reason for some skepticism. In the past, a lot of their sessions seemed to pick up distorted or manipulated signals—almost like the information was being intercepted by some kind of overlay or interference field, twisted, and then fed back to the viewers. This wasn't necessarily them lying on purpose; it was more like the system (whatever 'system' means—collective distortions, external influences, or something else) was jamming or bending the pure data. That's why threads pop up calling them 'liars' or saying the info can't be trusted—people felt the dissonance.
But things have shifted. The distortion fields and overlays that used to mess with the signal appear to be cleared or nullified now. Recent projects (like their looks at 2025-2026 events, Venezuela predictions, or ongoing mysteries) seem to come through cleaner, with less interception. The viewers are pulling from a more direct, unfiltered source again.
They're not claiming perfect accuracy—remote viewing never is 100%—but the manipulation angle feels less active. If you've followed them, watch the raw sessions yourself (mute the commentary if needed) and see what resonates. The distrust was earned before, but the channel looks more open now. Thoughts?

Well, remote-viewing is, according to Courtney, something that all the ISBE's around the galaxy can do.

So it makes sense that there is some sort of Technology that can impair or disable it.

Much like Radar blockers for Cars and Military situations.

I don't dismiss the idea that Farsight could have suffered from these ET interferences for years and that some new anti-jamming tech was roled in.

Who knows what it involves. Perhaps even having some of the remote-viewing streamed in from off-planet or out-of-our-dimension to improve the accuracy.

I'm not a great critic of Farsights remote-viewing. I'm quite casual and don't scrutinise every word. I prefer just going along with the stories and choosing ones that resonate and moving on from those that don't.

@ivan newton:

I accused Farsight of lying, because with the 3i/Atlas project, they started to present information that was not part of the remote viewing session as if it was part of the session.

The possibility that the viewers' perception is tampered with by the ETs is a different problem. In that case, Farsight is not lying, but just believing that the ETs are honest.

To be clear: It's totally possible that the ETs do help them getting a clearer picture. But it's still an authoritarian approach, because that way, Farsight becomes the authority and "normal" people refrain from remote viewing themselves, as they don't get the same help. This makes humans dependent on the ETs when it comes to remote viewing. Does this feel good to you?

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/77341-the-morality-of-remote-viewing

It neither feels bad or good to me. As someone who works with a lot university faculty and students, it’s like being able to study yourself vs studying with a tutor. it’s not clear that all humans don’t have access to an alien tutor it’s just that some don’t know how to communicate clearly and receive what the tutor is saying.

I’ve had students who have asked tutors for help, thinking engineering here or music, where the student doesn’t have the basic ability to even understand or hear what the professor or student is saying. That doesn’t mean the tutor doesn’t want to help them. And RV communication would be that but on steroids, meaning it demands more studying initially from the student to appropriately access the wisdom the teacher has. I remember in grad school at Berkeley leaning various things about religion and philosophy but at the time i didn’t have enough of a foundation to make sense of it. But now like 20
years later, it makes more sense.

Anyway.i see what you’re saying manuel and it should be noted. Also, just offering the paradigm that makes sense to me. it’s not a perfect analogy by any stretch but it’s far from disempowering of further investigation or deception. my two cents

@Grant Eckhart:

My concern is that the tutor becomes a "guru" that people follow because they don't want to think for themselves. So many people on this planet are so gullible, because the education system is based on authority, not knowledge of truth.

You can summarize it like this: A good tutor teaches people how to think, not what to think.

It's not clear yet whether the so-called good ETs are good tutors.

Good distinction Manuel. This is also a part of why gnosticism especially in the sethian and somewhat in valentines tradition leaves me thinking it’s not as great as many think it is. One must seek the secret knowledge from someone thereby often becoming dependent on them rather than cultivating it from within.