I'm using basic speech to text so it's probably not going to come out as clear.

the far site 3. 0 presentation is good so far just a few little pieces that I wanted to share first off with yemi's Avatar and the mo cap Technology.

I suspect that the main purpose for mocap was so that when you do Recreations of characters , they are subjects as viewed by the remote viewers. you would be able to actually produce their interactions clearly because with artificial intelligence it makes too many guesses basically puts a lot of AOL, leave the scene that the viewer was describing.

with yemi using Mo cap I think it's great but there's one irony you basically have a beautiful woman creating an avatar of a beautiful woman, of herself, and then using the Avatar instead of the Flesh and Blood person. you can welcome the remote viewer to choose whatever they want for wear, I don't think it matters so provocative or not it's up to them. however they can choose whatever they want to wear in Flesh and Blood just as much as they can choose whatever they want to put on with their Avatar so it does feel a little bit silly to see.

the real purpose of the mocap when it comes to recreating the imagery that the remote viewers want to portray, I do see how this will probably reintegrate with Unreal Engine and other programs eventually.

---

Aziza's presentation with ball and yam was particularly impressive especially because the embellishment was put in the right region of the video when the video is introduced. I think embellishment is welcome because we're really just giving an entertaining introduction to the idea but during the video things were a lot more disciplined all of the graphic input was basically to add Clarity to what the remote viewer was seeing and to also illustrate where Aziz was making connections rather than adding an entertaining distraction confused what is the remote viewing data versus what is a fun embellishment .

so I think the bal and yam video is an excellent overall example of how the mystery projects would get produced I don't think yemi's mocap is really necessary I think that was the only strange part to me I think yemi does a great job presenting in real face and body however I think there's also a temptation to just experiment with mocap for now , you bought all this equipment you're thinking well we have to use it then, but as time goes on your viewers will want to demonstrate specifically how they saw certain figures interacting in their viewing sessions and so they will want to use mocap to portray how those figures looked, not portraying themselves in their own avatar but the subjects that they were perceiving.

---

Lastly I just want to stress on the necessity for the remote viewer to have an editorial control on their presentation before the entire video gets sewn together , so basically for example if yemy does a viewing and someone does the technical follow-up yemi has a full control over that technical follow-up to give last final touch input and potentially remove things that may be less accurate to what she was perceiving.

With intysam same thing the Graphics seem to match what her drawings were so it remained very accurate however it's just important that she would have been able to look at the Final Cut of her section before it gets joined together

I would also add a reactionary format the way you've been doing with the interviews. it is best if you could do it board meeting style for example in the ball and yam video If Aziz were able to sit down with yummy and intisome and then show the reveal because the remote viewers reaction to the reveal says a lot about what they were actually perceiving and whether it seems to really match. it's for them to give last-minute input before the entire setup starts to draw conclusions . a reminder that the technology really is showing fruition , farsight has been getting a lot of criticism saying why bother with the technology but I'm getting to see why this is important and let's face it eye candy will be necessary to break out of the box

indeed. my opinion also.. although i don't believe we really need the mocap stuff, specially when this last project was so distracting . It's true that i also said back then that it was cool to have the remote viewer to virtually being put in the middle of these visuals sessions to help the audience engage more in depth with the events, the problem is i guess. once again the quality of this mocap.. not there.. i don't understand why Courtney and Aziz don't use MetaHuman on Unreal Engine and Blender for the body to create their Mocap's version ->

In Japan, they have a lot of technology that really could be useful here.

It seems that Farsight are touching on some of it.

I generally agree that scene recreation in something like unreal engine would be the best way to use limited resources going forward. That would give the total immersive experience.

Users would be able to load up a scene/time/event and travel there and watch for themselves.

Also there is vrchat, which might not be best for character recreation, but might be ideal for viewer recreation. ie they are the crazy avatar that drifts into past/present/future scenes and look crazy, play their own crazy soundtrack and the whole thing is just fun. like:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cgeXxcyxObU

As for the Acting, my opinion is that if static, historical or future scenes are being remote-viewed, it might be best to use trained actors. They could be face-swapped in post-production to be the Czar, Vladimir Putin, Trump, whoever. We have a Museum exhibit here where users can hold conversations with Historical characters (using Ai) and do an interview about their life or particular events.

But enhance the experience not by shooting single camera, but in full 3D, with four cameras. Use point clouds and then let the (paying) Viewer/Customer, choose where they want to be in the room.

In Japan, I have access to many affordable Film sets. They cost perhaps 1/2 of what they cost in Australia and that is probably 1/4th of what they cost in the United States.

They also have loads of Actors, (who are basically skilled unemployed people) that are looking for gigs.

I would estimate, that a typical scene of some Historical event with actual Actors could be shot within one working day.

Post-Production on top of that might add another week, but would result, hopefully in a 3D explorable scene that could potentially be reused.

So it wouldn't be a 'Movie' that would be recreated, it would literally be a new immersive 'Dimension' and the model of course would be 'Pay to Play'.

At home, the User could use a PC, Game-machine, VR Glasses, iphone, their home Cinema room, whatever.

In summary I think that it's the final cinematic touches, such as experience in set design, costumes, acting and filming that are possibly what is being asked for.

Yes, it is possible to face-swap, cloth-swap an actor to anything but it takes time.

There is also a thing in FilmMaking called 'suspension of disbelief', it's used for animation. There is a point where the Human mind is unable to differentiate between an animation and an inFlesh character. That is why Cartoons work.

The point wouldn't be to make the scene characters cartoons but the viewer themself. It's done in games.

Here is an example: