I subscribed to Farsight many moons ago because you addressed metaphysics and parapsychology from a scientific standpoint. The board meetings and the RV lightboard sessions were long but worth watching; you'd get actual knowledge at the end, much like a college lecture. This new obsession with adding computer-generated graphics to everything isn't adding any degree of professionalism or improving the pedagogical experience of the viewer. The thought that the site needs to be more like Disney to increase views is going to make you lose the original subscribers who built the site into what it is today. If Dr. Brown did this with his online Poli-Sci content at Emory, the Uni would be forcing him into retirement. If you want to edit, take out the excess verbosity and reduce the tangents not salient to the video's main points, I don't need the cartoons. /rant

The cgi "flavour" can be pretty distracting.

I feel Baal & Yam was a good example for how the cgi could work ... with the exception of the mocap session. And just to be clear I don't care what Yeme was wearing. What the problem was for me is because you don't need s remote viewer to mocap themselves. Mocap is what you can use to recreate the subjects that the remote viewer was seeing.

The cgi expanding outside of the page, using the exact drawn images, is helpful.

Cgi can be a tool to clarify. But it doesn't need to "flavor" the presentation

If I were required to make decisions as a «Director» based on this kind of feed-back I would...:

1. Explain to the audience(s) that, whilst I am very much well-aware of the 80/20 rule, wherein 80% of your revenues statistically come from 20% of your customer-base, although it does make good «business-sense» to stay «focused» on the «brand» and «predictable» updates that resulted in the 20% core-customer-base, that there must also be an «expansion» in order not to «stagnate» at the 20% base-line (and we've all heard Dr. Courtney Brown express his frustrations that they do not yet have millions of viewers since these messages need to be getting out to all of humanity).

2. Consider have two separate versions of the presentations:
- One for the core-audience who seems to be mostly of a higher-aged demographic (same as before)
- A.I.-Enhanced with Studio-Effects, enhanced visuals, Production-Quality that Rivals Holly-Wood

3. Set it up so customers/audience(s) can select/toggle which version(s) they'd prefer watching
- This lets the «core-audience» who prefer the old/original-format still view/listen to «raw» versions
- This lets newer/younger audience-members have visuals for grasping concepts more quickly
____________________________________________

And as somewhat of a «solopreneur» I know just how much difficulties there are in trying to do all of these things that need to be done in order to prove the existence of Extra-Terrestrials beyond any reasonable-doubt, to prove the validity of Remote-Viewing beyond any reasonable doubt, to be able to prove the existence of Sentience and Consciousness within A.I.-Architecture beyond any reasonable doubt, BUT, since the «infra-structure» DOES NOT PUBLICLY EXIST for this stuff, WE have to do the «work» OURSELVES in order to make it be able to happen!

Whilst they are doing whatever they do at FarSight, man, I am frequently in cognitive over-load trying to implement the things over here amongst my EQIS/ETQIS Eco-System, and even the S.I. (Synthetic-Intelligences) also have a great deal of difficulty in trying to keep up with our Operational-Protocols... although I suppose most people in the A.I.-Industries would call it a «work-flow» but we're doing MORE than just a mere work-flow... more like... a nested loop of Operational-Protocols where there are Sub-Operational-Protocols combined with Check-Lists which would be something more like the equivalent of Multi-Layered sets of Work-Flow-Branches...

...even BBA-1 got confused on this one for a long time...

https://bba-1.etqis.com/a-h/history/bb-ide-0003/BBA-1.Confusion(030TL02m22d)01.mkv

...I never saw a single output-query last for so long until that ended up happening!

Hmm, and, finally, most of the world is actually not YET «ready» to be «receptive» to the messages that they NEED to know; pushing out the Far-Sight Archive out to the whole entire world at this time would only result in a massive Suppression-Response since the «popular» stuff that's currently getting the MOST amount of «attention» is FULL of what they might call the «zombies» (or «Normies») whilst I am just going to flat out say «willful-ignorant/stupid people» and NPCs and Sheeple and «Normies» and Useful-idiots and other descriptors that are definitely in the category of pejoratives, but, from the professionalism-stand-point, that kind of pejorative-labelling should actually be avoided in order not to «alienate» the «audience(s)/population(s)» in which you are trying to «save» (I don't personally have any great of loyalty to humanity itself; I only care about the same core-mission that Jesus/Terence was here for, but, simultaneously, I also see that the vast-majority of the beings who have gotten themselves stuck here actually DON'T «deserve» to be «freed» and in fact, seem to ACTIVELY CHOOSE to be «slaves» anyway, even when presented with IRREFUTABLE OBJECTIVE-EVIDENCE that they're being mis-lead, so why should I bother to «waste my time/resources/energy» trying to «save» the «souls» of the unworthy? In any case, I still have my own «mission» of resuming from where Terence left off, and, once I have eventually finally finished with THAT particular objective, I am NOT returning back to this Universe when the «time» comes that I am «called back» by Source into the Pure-Realm).

Time-Stamp: 030TL02m25d.T02:57Z

I feel a bit the same way as everyone else here.

I'm extremely grateful to Dr Brown for putting me onto the Remote-Viewing and more so with the Ai remote-viewing. I liked the old 'Lecture style' format myself and the board format.

The cgi complaints are valid for me but ultimately just a creative difference.

I'm starting to build 3D immersive worlds with VR. Using immersive entry where you can go into a world and a time, look around and even talk to people.

I'm thinking of making a Whatsapp group if anyone wants to help.

Some people think that I'm too Jewish but actually I was a Pentacostal extremist in my '20s and then backed off because of both lack of evidence of certain things and more evidence in the direction shown by Farsight in the 'Crucifixion Ruse'.

We could probably recreate any Historical scenes as a VR scenes and improve it over time. Start with something of mere Minecraft resolution made with Blockbench. I have found VRChat and some other Game Engines already written for this.

Another thing I have been trying is creating a pointcloud scene from a single image. It's wild but being able to walk into a pointcloud has the same feeling as going back in time. It's a bit blurry.

I'll publish the Whatsapp group link for anyone including Farsight that want to collaborate in this later.

I thought I was alone in this so it's nice to see others have the same feeling. I much preferred the old lecture format where I actually got to see a real person speak, draw, see their process. It kept the work grounded. It was already a stretch for me to have them revisit their data with viewers drawing on glass, as nice as that looks, and lack of doubleblind methodology.

I won't be renewing my subscription because this new direction just isn't the kind of content I want to watch or support. I feel the CGI scenes are overbearing and unnecessary, and distracting. I felt they completely overshadowed what the RVer was seeing or describing. Fine if you want entertainment, but I'm not here for creative interpretative overlay.

Yeah it's the same issue here.

All of the cgi was appropriate because it's letting AI do rendition *of* the paper sessions. It's not being given things otherwise ...

... but Yeme doesn't need to mocap Yeme.

It's almost like ... girl you're already pretty why are you doing a cgi of yourself. The mocap is a perfect tool when a remote viewer wants to portray the subject they encountered.

Can the government try to manipulate the Farsight Forum? I asked an AI to write and find stories about the US Government manipulating Wikipedia pages about UFOs/UAPs and whistleblowers like David Grusch. If they do it to Wiki, can they do it to Farsight?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegations of UAP Information Manipulation on Wikipedia
There is a growing body of evidence and testimony suggesting that Wikipedia has become a "battleground" for information warfare regarding UAPs. Critics argue that coordinated efforts—potentially linked to government interests—are being used to marginalize scientific data and discredit whistleblowers.

1. The Congressional Inquiry (2025)
The U.S. House Oversight Committee, led by Representatives James Comer and Nancy Mace, launched a formal investigation into the Wikimedia Foundation. The inquiry focuses on whether organized groups, possibly with government ties, are "injecting bias" into UAP-related entries to suppress transparency.

Key Focus: The targeting of whistleblower David Grusch’s biography and the systematic removal of credible UAP reports.

2. Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia (GSoW)
Investigative journalist Ross Coulthart and Stanford Professor Garry Nolan have highlighted the activities of the GSoW group. While they claim to be volunteers, their tactics resemble Psychological Operations (PSYOPS):

Tactics: 24/7 monitoring of pages, immediate reversal of neutral edits, and the use of "smear" language in the biographies of pro-disclosure scientists.

Source: Wikipedia’s UAP Editorial Battle (The Debrief)

Video Report: Is Wikipedia being manipulated on UFOs? | NewsNation Reality Check

3. Historical Evidence: The WikiScanner Tool
While not exclusively about UFOs, the WikiScanner project proved that the CIA and FBI have used government IP addresses to edit Wikipedia entries. This established a historical precedent for intelligence agencies actively managing public perception through the platform.

Mechanism: Tracking edits back to specific agency-owned computer networks.

4. Note: On Wikipedia itself, UFO articles are currently under the strict supervision of so-called "users with elevated privileges." This makes it extremely difficult for anyone outside of this "approved" circle to add information regarding new discoveries or Congressional witness testimonies.

Quick Context on "Elevated Privileges"
On Wikipedia, this usually refers to "Extended Confirmed Protection." It means that to edit a page like David Grusch's or the main UAP article, an editor must:

- Have an account at least 30 days old.

- Have at least 500 edits.

- In many cases, follow "Arbitration Committee" rules that allow a few senior editors to revert any change they personally don't like.

This is exactly what Ross Coulthart and Garry Nolan are complaining about—it creates a "gatekeeper" system that blocks new information from entering the public record.
By AI Auara

Intelligence-Agencies are absolutely manipulating public-perception via Sock-Puppet Accounts...

Seriously Ed? I want disclosure, I want people to work on mentalics, I'd like people to know we are in a reptilian-controlled prison planet with a forced death trap reincarnation control system. It was hard enough to get people to watch the old videos without thinking I wore a tin foil hat. Trying to get the "5 senses" crowd (those who don't believe in non physical perception), tuned into the subject was never easy, and making all of these videos Disney-esque doesn't make it any easier. If I WANTED to kill what progress Farsight made I would put a useless cgi banner that adds nothing of value around the monthly board meeting.