I was always wondering: how many of my thoughts are really mine?
And how many of them are just input from, let’s say, negative ETs?

1. The “Death Traps” theory, according to information from that project and others, after death a light appears and then you get caught in some kind of electric net. What does that suggest? That there is some kind of 24‑hour surveillance of your body. Because when you leave your body as OBE, you don’t see any light. If they can monitor every human body in real time, can they also monitor your thoughts in real time?

2. Human leadership has been compromised - according to that project, all human leaders’ thoughts are somehow controlled by ETs. If they can do that to leaders, can they do it to us?
I think that with AI they can observe and input thoughts into people’s minds. In the project, I think Yeme said that thousands of humans are connected to the ET surveillance system.

So my question is: how many of your thoughts are truly yours?

But there is also a positive side. In the projects about Putin, there is a mention that even if they can see your thoughts, they won’t try to interfere if you are in a calm state, because it’s pointless. They only try to influence you when you are angry.
At least that’s what I remember from that project.

> can they also monitor your thoughts in real time?

Yes, but, not in the manner that humans perceive as time, since time is not genuinely linear.

> If they can do that to leaders, can they do it to us?

Happens ALL THE TIME, but, frequently from people who don't know that they already died...

> how many of your thoughts are truly yours?

This is not necessarily a quantifiable-number, but, according to The Testament of Truth, people are indeed «thought-controlled» via their Negative-Emotions (e.g.: fear, anger, greed, etc.)

From the Voice of Terence himself... https://the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/audio/spirposs.mp3

Time-Stamp: 030TL02m25d.T12:38Z

States of panic, rage, and guilt are probably so discordant that other non-neutral thoughts become unnoticeable. Thinking "don't think negative thoughts" is probably unhelpful, it's again fear based.

However, the ability to notice and process one's own thoughts I'm sure is valuable for both defense and pragmatic purposes.

Isn't it surprising how little is taught in schools about things like logical fallacy and cognitive distortion. There isn't really like a "mental hygiene day" or that sort.

I always thought that the "mental committee" is a rather effective tool. We have an array of personalities that seem internal to us, and when we identify them we can sense ourselves entering those modes. Perhaps we could get a sense for which mode feels interior. If one does not feel interior, it's like a ceremonial removal of a mode from the committee.

In any case, remote viewing seems to remain a necessary component. I've noticed that sometimes just the pre-session of SRV with the Physical , Emotional , Mental state becomes a time for introspection and if a lot comes up we can say "ok I'll process these first and do the session later"

The other thing is we have a tendency to think some thoughts are bad and others good. I would say some could use a bit more process. I certainly think some actions are bad. But I think if we started with the premise that all thoughts are ok when it comes to processing we would have a much healthier mental environment in itself.

Some counsellors may be proficient for co-examining one's thoughts but I wouldn't trust the modern day licensure for it. New systems would need to arise to reasonably screen for proficiency

"From the Voice of Terence himself..."

Appeal to authority.

Your thoughts are not yours if you believe things just because another person said it.

Your thoughts are yours if you come to your own conclusions by questioning what is being said, no matter who is saying it.

@Edward:

"how many of your thoughts are truly yours?"

If you start to question your thoughts, you will begin to experience a "reaction". But be aware: If you're doing it right, it can feel as if you're going insane. Don't fear that state. Remain calm.

Here's how to begin: Watch the Pixar movie "Inside Out". Then imagine that the thought patterns inside your head represent different parts of you, your past, the inner child, your parents, you name it. Learn how to distinguish them.

There will be a pattern that doesn't feel like the others. It's essentially an "agent provocateur" inside your own head.

For example, I identified a thought pattern that tried to push certain buttons. A call it the clown, based on the Star Trek Voyager episode "The Thaw". If you know that episode, you know why I chose that name.

I don't know whether that thought pattern is a natural part of me, another being, or an implanted AI. Could be anything. But I refrain from getting rid of it, because in a way, it became helpful. It's like: Let the clown speak, so I know how it would manipulate me in this situation. It's important information.

Thank you all

The better way to frame this is to distinguish between the core awareness and the interface that generates the day to day thought stream.
There is a persistent spark that is attached to the body. It is stable, quiet, and not produced by the brain. The brain acts as a filter. It limits bandwidth and produces a surface layer of thoughts, reactions, and associations. Most of what we experience as “thinking” happens in this filtered interface layer, not in the core awareness itself.
Because of that, the thought stream is inherently mixed. Some impulses originate from the deeper core. Others are simply automatic loops from conditioning, memory, and emotional reactions. And if external influence exists, it would most likely enter at this same surface level, because that is where noise and suggestion already occur.
This also clarifies the surveillance question. If a system can track individuals, it does not need to read the entire content of every thought. Monitoring the interface state is enough. Emotional spikes, fear, anger, and strong intention are easier to detect than detailed semantic content. Influence would therefore be more about biasing the noisy surface layer than directly controlling the deeper core.
This is why calm states matter. When the surface layer is agitated, intrusive impulses blend in. When it is quiet, sudden foreign or incoherent thoughts are easier to notice and tend not to stick. The core awareness remains stable, but the filtered layer becomes either noisy or clear.
So the question “how many thoughts are truly yours” does not really have a numerical answer. The key point is that the deeper core is stable and not easily manipulated, while the surface thinking layer is variable and more susceptible to noise or influence. The more stable and coherent that surface layer becomes, the more the thought stream aligns with the deeper core rather than with external or conditioned input.

The brain-mind may participate in patterned, filtered, emotionally colored streams of thought shaped by habit, body, time, and environment. Because of this, the thoughts that arise in consciousness are not always identical with the deepest self. The task is therefore not to believe every thought, but to become alert enough to observe the cycles without being possessed by them. In that alert rest, a deeper awareness can be recognized beneath the passing stream.

-----------------

A poem about core awareness

The nearest thing is often the hardest to notice.

When you return to rest, you will find me.

-----------------

It's easy to know if a thought is yours or not. Are you getting a story? A reason to believe you should be 'doing' something about it? That's the Ego, the tricky god that gets you into trouble. It's all based in fear. The thoughts that these crazy folks have enables them to put thoughts or voices into our heads, it's called the 'voice of God' tech. They have the ability to biohack our minds and bodies.
We have three minds, it's a binary consciousness in this construct.

@Nancy:

"A reason to believe you should be 'doing' something about it? That's the Ego, the tricky god that gets you into trouble."

In a world where others can hurt and steal your body, you not doing anything about it means you will not defend yourself. This results in the bad people winning in this world, which turns it into hell – and that's a lot of trouble.

So, there are two possibilities:

1. Evacuate all the good people from this universe, such that the bad people are among themselves.

2. Defend yourself.