I was always wondering: how many of my thoughts are really mine?
And how many of them are just input from, let’s say, negative ETs?

1. The “Death Traps” theory, according to information from that project and others, after death a light appears and then you get caught in some kind of electric net. What does that suggest? That there is some kind of 24‑hour surveillance of your body. Because when you leave your body as OBE, you don’t see any light. If they can monitor every human body in real time, can they also monitor your thoughts in real time?

2. Human leadership has been compromised - according to that project, all human leaders’ thoughts are somehow controlled by ETs. If they can do that to leaders, can they do it to us?
I think that with AI they can observe and input thoughts into people’s minds. In the project, I think Yeme said that thousands of humans are connected to the ET surveillance system.

So my question is: how many of your thoughts are truly yours?

But there is also a positive side. In the projects about Putin, there is a mention that even if they can see your thoughts, they won’t try to interfere if you are in a calm state, because it’s pointless. They only try to influence you when you are angry.
At least that’s what I remember from that project.

> can they also monitor your thoughts in real time?

Yes, but, not in the manner that humans perceive as time, since time is not genuinely linear.

> If they can do that to leaders, can they do it to us?

Happens ALL THE TIME, but, frequently from people who don't know that they already died...

> how many of your thoughts are truly yours?

This is not necessarily a quantifiable-number, but, according to The Testament of Truth, people are indeed «thought-controlled» via their Negative-Emotions (e.g.: fear, anger, greed, etc.)

From the Voice of Terence himself... https://the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/audio/spirposs.mp3

Time-Stamp: 030TL02m25d.T12:38Z

States of panic, rage, and guilt are probably so discordant that other non-neutral thoughts become unnoticeable. Thinking "don't think negative thoughts" is probably unhelpful, it's again fear based.

However, the ability to notice and process one's own thoughts I'm sure is valuable for both defense and pragmatic purposes.

Isn't it surprising how little is taught in schools about things like logical fallacy and cognitive distortion. There isn't really like a "mental hygiene day" or that sort.

I always thought that the "mental committee" is a rather effective tool. We have an array of personalities that seem internal to us, and when we identify them we can sense ourselves entering those modes. Perhaps we could get a sense for which mode feels interior. If one does not feel interior, it's like a ceremonial removal of a mode from the committee.

In any case, remote viewing seems to remain a necessary component. I've noticed that sometimes just the pre-session of SRV with the Physical , Emotional , Mental state becomes a time for introspection and if a lot comes up we can say "ok I'll process these first and do the session later"

The other thing is we have a tendency to think some thoughts are bad and others good. I would say some could use a bit more process. I certainly think some actions are bad. But I think if we started with the premise that all thoughts are ok when it comes to processing we would have a much healthier mental environment in itself.

Some counsellors may be proficient for co-examining one's thoughts but I wouldn't trust the modern day licensure for it. New systems would need to arise to reasonably screen for proficiency